The Canada Free Press... because without America, there is no free world...
Hardly sounds Canadian. and that's the first clue that the website is a load of BS. I saw the pictures of the alleged ISM members holding weapons and read the article which is long on allegations, but short on proof.
Assuming the people in the photos are members of the ISM, they are posing for a picture with a rifle. That isn't the same as using it. I doubt the ISM would approve of the bad judgement of these individuals who failed to consider the optics of these photos.
Tell you what IM, show me a picture of the members of the ISM actually firing a weapon in a fire fight with the IDF or anyone else, and I'd accept your point. But I read that article and it uses a number of deceptive techniques. Or how about an incident where the IDF claims members of the ISM fought a battle with the IDF along side the militants.
The rifles in the article with claims that ISM used violence, implies that they used rifles to commit acts of violence. But read the article carefully and you'll see that they never actually make that claim that the ISM members used rifles for violence. The image creates that association not the words.
The article claims that some ISM members resorted to violence but is deliberately vague, which is suspicious.
The article also references the incident where the IDF arrested a member of the Islamic Jihad in a "house" rented by the ISM.... The ISM version of that incident is that it was raining when a wet person came into their "office" soaking wet and they gave them a towel to dry off. The person happened to be a member of the Islamic Jihad who was out after curfew and was being chased through the streets by the IDF... not because he attacked someone, but because he was out after curfew.... The IDF burst into the ISM office and arrested the "terrorist" for being out after curfew. If the IDF had grounds to believe the ISM had done anything wrong, I'm sure they would have been arrested too. This article twists that nothing incident into sounding sinister... which proves this source is deliberately manipulative.
I don't know for certain what kind of "violence" the CFP references, but likely its also as deceptive as the rest of the article.
EAO....if you support the enemies of western civilization, if you co-operate eagerly with violent lunatics, if you allow yourself to be used as a shield, a propaganda tool, and if you enter a military zone fully intending to disrupt military operations YOU ARE an enemy.....it matters little whether or not your weapon is an Kalishnikov or the media.
If she was too ****ing stupid to get out of the way of a military bulldozer in the middle of a war zone, then her death was not murder, it was suicide.
That is the reality.
That man in Tienanmen Square who stopped a column of tanks by using himself as a human shield... Was he also ****ing stupid or brave?
The enemies of western civilian are people who start unprovoked wars which slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians at taxpayer expense for the benefit of big oil companies. I don't recommend cooperating with those violent lunatics either, let alone re-electing them.
I don't support violence, but I certainly support people knowing what our violent lunatics are doing in the name defending Western civilization but in reality using our service men and women as poorly paid mercenaries fighting for big oil and religious zealots who believe God gave them land in Palestine.
BTW, I support freedom of religion up to the point where one persons religious beliefs infringe on the rights and freedoms of others.
I also support capitalism, up to the point where corporate greed violates the rights and freedoms of others.
