Absolutely. It amazes me how many people think that if you aren't calling for this film makers head on a platter, then you are defending him. Nothing can be further from the truth.
Don't you believe that because I support universal human rights, freedom and justice and oppose injustice and oppression (including that suffered by Palestinians), that I must support Palestinian war crimes? Nothing could be further from the truth.
For the record I only support non-violent resistance to oppression and injustice only. IMO these forms of resistance are far more likely to lead to peace than violence and war crimes.
What a load of BS Goober. Don't you ever tire of attributing to me opinions I don't have? I support the right of Rushdie to write crappy books which insult Islam and profit from the resulting notoriety. His book regarding Mohammad should have been denounced and then ignored.
For the record, this is my opinion of Iran
eao:
...Iran is an oppressive religious state with an abysmal human rights record. I oppose Iran's discrimination based on religion, gender and sexual orientation. They have the death penalty. So I also don't support Canada having close relations with Iran. I also find holocaust denial objectionable, but diversionary...
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/c...-diplomatic-relations-iran-2.html#post1645573
Holocaust denial is a good example of how we in the west impose limits on freedom of speech. While some people may find holocaust denial as offensive as some Muslims found this movie, as far as I know, holocaust denial has never led to any riots or deaths (unlike this movie which was deliberately designed to be as offensive as possible and trigger riots and protests) although it has caused professors to loose tenure and laws limiting free speech associated with the holocaust have led to prison sentences.
Since the Innocence of Muslims film's primary purpose was to generate hate and insult an entire religion... its not that different in nature from holocaust denial and therefore should be treated the same way.
IMO, Legitimate research into Mohammad's life and the Nazi death camps should be protected, while hate propaganda against Muslims, Jews or any other identifiable group should be discouraged. (legal, but denounced and the author discredited) Those of you who believe that Holocaust Denial should remain illegal, yet support this film despite its obvious hate inspired nature are hypocrites.
Back on subject:
IMO, this film triggered the riots, but the 14 people who died in the attack (4 American diplomats, 10 Libyan police officers and security personnel) referenced in the OP were the result of heavily armed militants who took advantage of the riots... That attack was going to happen anyway, regardless of the movie.
IMO, reports of this attack which only mention the diplomat deaths, ignore the sacrifices of Libyan security and police officials and did not report the Libyan protests against these attacks (This attack does not represent Libya or Muslims)... are not just incomplete, inaccurate and misleading... some reports are anti-Muslim, anti-Libyan hate propaganda... and not that different in intent than the offending movie.