Read "cannibalizing trolls".He directly comments on a topic about 20% of the time.
The remainder is spent on stirring up ****.
We all know why you get sensitive when you speak of me.
Read "cannibalizing trolls".He directly comments on a topic about 20% of the time.
The remainder is spent on stirring up ****.
He directly comments on a topic about 20% of the time.
The remainder is spent on stirring up ****.
Oh oh, you two are exposing your butthurt and dishonesty again.
Bear... the real world awaits... enjoy your CC Board day and presumed self-importance as your self-acknowledged, "CannibalTrollMan'! :lol:
Bear... the real world awaits... enjoy your CC Board day and presumed self-importance as your self-acknowledged, "CannibalTrollMan'! :lol:
We all understand why you have me on ignore, for the same reason waldo won't address my quetion.You can understand why I have him on ignore now.
That's because he asks question, I help you insert your foot in your mouth.I've had more productive conversations with petros.
I'll take the warmers seriously when they end their own dependence on carbon.
I've noticed that if you want to make a Jehovah witness happy when they knock on your door, you just ask them a few questionss....We all understand why you have me on ignore, for the same reason waldo won't address my quetion.
That's because he asks question, I help you insert your foot in your mouth.
We all understand why you have me on ignore, for the same reason waldo won't address my quetion.
.
if you want to say something, have the "Retired Soldier" guts to say it directly and make your pointed accusation.
you don't need your described "global warmists" to tell you anything about anything...
it's called the greenhouse effect
the earth is in a long-term natural cooling cycle... however, that cycle doesn't turn/switch on the decadal level you suggest. Of course, that natural cycle is being influenced by the warming of the relatively recent period. Pro Tip: whenever you see reference to periods around 1997, note that as the favoured cherry-pick starting point by deniers... a point that correlates with one of the warmest ENSO events of recent history.
care to provide a reference from which you've drawn this interpretation. Thanks in advance.
The natural warming of the Earth's climate as a result of the end of the little Ice Age has led to more CO2 in the atmosphere. A warming atmosphere leads to more natural CO2. It's NOT the case that more CO2 is causing the atmosphere to warm up. It's just you Global Warmists who have got it all a*rse about ***, as usual. If you don't believe me, do your own research.
Oh, don't confuse them with facts. Dere witto heads mite explode.So if it's the same thing that's been going on for hundreds of thousands of years, 'natural warming', where is the long increase in temperature that has always, that is until now, preceded the rise in CO2? It's in the ice cores for all the previous warmings except for this one. You should do some more research. Clearly something has changed, I wonder what that could be? If only there was a way of determining where the carbon dioxide came from. Oh, there is. You could do a bit of math and calculate the carbon dioxide produced from our very well tracked fossil fuel inventories. Or you could examine the isotopes of carbon in the atmosphere. It's from burning fossil fuels.