Conservative White Males Climate Skeptics
- Thread starter grainfedpraiboy
- Start date
the Daily Mail "journalist", David Rose, has absolutely no credibility, none whatsoever... the worst of the worst tabloid misinformers!
again, that article speaks to a single year sea-ice extent change... year-to-year change. Let me focus you again on the 2 declining trend images I put forward in the post you're replying to; apparently, you choose to simply ignore these long-term declining trend images:
notwithstanding, again, any single year change in sea-ice extent is termed 'First-Year Ice'... it only becomes "Multi-Year Ice" (as in building multiple layers of ice), if a subsequent year's melting phase... doesn't melt it! Which is why I (also) emphasized the decreasing volume trend.
by the by, peppering a post with on-line comments, any post... adds... uhhh..... what value?
no - you can't slag the greenhouse effect as it's responsible for keeping the earth warm enough for basic human survival. Tell me, what would happen to the earth/mankind if your described "bollocks greenhouse effect" didn't exist?
natural? What natural influences... natural forcing factors, natural physical mechanisms? Your "coming out of the Little Ice Age (LIA) warming" premise is based on accepting that the causes behind the LIA energy imbalance cooling have since changed state to now cause a positive radiative forcing... and the related relatively recent global warming. Oh wait, is there where you now state the LIA cooling was... also natural in cause? :lol:
Natural CO2? From where... originating, from where? if you've, as you say, "done the research", can you provide references to that end... most pointedly references that speak to the atmospheric carbon isotope variants of CO2 and the respective C13/C12 & C14/C12 isotope ratio equivalents to support your claim that increased/accelerated CO2 today is reflective of your claim that the, "CO2 is natural in origin"?
I take that to mean that conservative white males are the only ones that are concerned about the economy. You know, the money thingy that keeps the anti everything freeloaders welfare cheques coming.
Ya so?
And again, since you ignored the last time I asked this... Ya so?
I'm not white, I'm not a conservative, and I have an issue with something that will drastically change my life and how I live and work.
Which are valid parts of my identity.
So, can you answer my question, or not?
This thread should be titled White on the dole Socialist drywallers working under the table off Kijiji ads.
you shouldn't have taken the study finding to suggest "ALL" persons... fit, or don't fit, within the group categorizations. That, most definitely, is not the study finding.
Nice job at avoiding the question.
How about you answer the question if you want to be taken seriously.
you mean your... "Ya so" question? Is that your, "to be taken seriously" question?
In response to a rant against blackleaf....
Rare undersea volcanic vents show oceans' increasing acidity likely to hurt biodiversity, endanger ecosystem stability, say Stanford researchers
Some rare undersea volcanic vents that emit carbon dioxide – which makes the water around them more acidic – have given Stanford researchers a look at how marine ecosystems may be affected as global warming intensifies. Carbon dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas causing global warming, and as it accumulates in the atmosphere, it also moves into the ocean and increases its acidity.
Oceans' increasing acidity likely to hurt biodiversity, Stanford researchers say
I've asked this before with no response...."who is monitoring the 1,000,000+ geothermal vents?"
Rare undersea volcanic vents show oceans' increasing acidity likely to hurt biodiversity, endanger ecosystem stability, say Stanford researchers
Some rare undersea volcanic vents that emit carbon dioxide – which makes the water around them more acidic – have given Stanford researchers a look at how marine ecosystems may be affected as global warming intensifies. Carbon dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas causing global warming, and as it accumulates in the atmosphere, it also moves into the ocean and increases its acidity.
Oceans' increasing acidity likely to hurt biodiversity, Stanford researchers say
I've asked this before with no response...."who is monitoring the 1,000,000+ geothermal vents?"
you don't have to accept the study findings; that's your perogative. Since you claim to be neither white or conservative, your apparent difficulty with the study is that your, as you said, "identity parts", do not fit completely within the study's major finding's full demographic assignment. If you want to take everything quite literally... you're also, I believe, not American. I did provide a link to the study's abstract... let me quote you from the abstract and bold-highlight a couple of words for you; words that should alleviate your concern over not being included within the study's categorized group finding:
Quoting studies as an attempt to appear educated is very very sad.
The study says you're white Bear. Get over it. Being white ain't so bad.
The study says you're white Bear. Get over it. Being white ain't so bad.
your question has been answered; if you don't accept it, that is certainly your perogative