Refering to yourself in the third person is something like the royal "We".......Something only a conceited , egotistical person, full of herself would do.....Have a great day
NATO nations set to reap spoils of Libya war
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Refering to yourself in the third person is something like the royal "We".......Something only a conceited , egotistical person, full of herself would do.....Have a great day
What's keeping you. ??
Gadhafi forces given 4 days to surrender
Ultimatum for regime loyalists to give up arms by Saturday
Gadhafi forces given 4 days to surrender - World - CBC News
.....so any bets as to which way this is going to go?? Scenario ???
Badly. They will not surrender, Canada and other European nations will end up having to send in land forces.
Many more will die, western forces and Libyans.
And you'll blame the US.
Anyone disagree with that assessment?
I think Daffy's nuts - in a Hitler/Napoleon sort of way. As long as he's alive, anyone who thinks he has a chance in Daffy's good books will defend him. I'd wager if Daffy's done, so are they....
"Several claims....made about NATO's involvement (have) little basis in reality," including:
(1) Preventing a Benghazi massacre. It "was NATO propaganda."
In fact, mass killing only began when NATO arrived and hasn't stopped.
(2) Replacing Gaddafi to protect civilians and install a more democratic regime.
NATO plans occupation and puppet leaders taking orders from Washington, as well as plundering Libya for profit.
(3) "(N)o foreign troops on the ground" will be used.
"This NATO pledge was mendacious....British (and other Western) ground troops were extensively deployed in Libya," arriving before conflict began last winter.
(4) "Britain was not taking sides in a foreign civil war."
In fact, Washington, Britain, and other NATO countries partnered to oust Gaddafi. Insurgents, supported by air power, were recruited to do it. Western interests "most emphatically decided the fate of the Libyan people. (They) brought anarchy in the place of order....(They can't) disown the consequences."
Rebel Assassins Terrorizing Libyans | War Is A Crime .org
(1) Preventing a Benghazi massacre. It "was NATO propaganda."
In fact, mass killing only began when NATO arrived and hasn't stopped.
(2) Replacing Gaddafi to protect civilians and install a more democratic regime.
NATO plans occupation and puppet leaders taking orders from Washington, as well as plundering Libya for profit.
(3) "(N)o foreign troops on the ground" will be used.
"This NATO pledge was mendacious....British (and other Western) ground troops were extensively deployed in Libya," arriving before conflict began last winter.
(4) "Britain was not taking sides in a foreign civil war."
In fact, Washington, Britain, and other NATO countries partnered to oust Gaddafi. Insurgents, supported by air power, were recruited to do it. Western interests "most emphatically decided the fate of the Libyan people. (They) brought anarchy in the place of order....(They can't) disown the consequences."
Rebel Assassins Terrorizing Libyans | War Is A Crime .org
AbtFet;1469942 [URL="http://warisacrime.org/content/rebel-assassins-terrorizing-libyans" said:
Love your sources! Article above written by Stephen Lendman:
Stephen Lendman - 'Lies, Damn lies & bin Laden's death' (2-May-11)(CONSPIRITOLOGY series) - YouTube
Stephen Lendman on Zionism and the Threat that it Poses - YouTube
Quotes extensively from Michel Chossudovsky:
Michel Chossudovsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yep. Any other opinions from the local nuthouse????
Isn't that like US foreign war policy??? that has become the standard for these "interventions" which are selectively done ,
There have been dangerous leaders in many areas that have been ignored , where the populations suffered beyond anything acceptable and continue to suffer. But their region has nothing the US -er-NATO wants .
Have a feeling that Ghadaffi is as good as dead. He too has much information about His/ US relationship that the US will not want made public ......in a trial
Target assassinations are now a real option and becoming another element of US "foreign policy"
They made sure SH was lynched in the ugliest of ways. America rejoiced.
they; murdered OBL in cold blood . Americans rejoiced.
Now that they can't locate Ghadaffi........ they will spin it some way to make him a target for their assassins. Not sure how long it will be before he is 'wanted dead or alive".
Those that support such savagery and inhumanity are as barbaric as those they target to kill. Civilization demands that all people be treated in a civil , court of law . Seems the lawless exist on all sides now. and that is a very bad prognosis for the future.
What a stupid question!
You see Bear, when Muslims kill Muslims it's an internal thing. When Non-Muslims kill Muslims to stop them from killing other muslims it's a war crime.
I certainly hope so!!!!
Ahhhhh, Hussein was tried, found guilty of mass murder of citizens of all ages and genders, sentenced and hanged by the proper authorities........
Bin Laden conducted a military operation against the USA and was killed in a military operation.........that is not murder. It IS justice. Not only Americans rejoiced, most decent citizens of the west rejoiced.
I wish their assasins every success.....we owe Gaghafi at least 270 deaths.
LOL!!!!
To quote the great George Orwell:
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Trials of mas murderers and meglomaniacal lunatics are simply offered opportunity to grandstand for the accused, and inspiration to more mass murder for their followers.
A quick bullet behind the ear on a public street is so much more efficient....and just.
BTW, weren't you jusy complaining that Saddam HAD a trial??
MAKE UP YOUR MIND....
Bin Laden conducted a military operation against the USA and was killed in a military operation.........that is not murder. It IS justice[i/]
That is not even remotely reasonable. or factual..........& what is scary is that kind of thinking is found in despot areas that have not evolved into some semblance of civilization. In fact they don't THINK or assess or question. They just accept the gov't explanations without question or analysis.
that entire 9-11 "explanation" is suspect. Too many unexplained aspects that prevent one from accepting it at face value to begin with.
but then it is so much easier to take what you are told , accept it without question as to question is far too threatening. The real truth could turn out to be very ugly and some just can't face that.
That is not even remotely reasonable. or factual..........& what is scary is that kind of thinking is found in despot areas that have not evolved into some semblance of civilization. In fact they don't THINK or assess or question. They just accept the gov't explanations without question or analysis.
that entire 9-11 "explanation" is suspect. Too many unexplained aspects that prevent one from accepting it at face value to begin with.
but then it is so much easier to take what you are told , accept it without question as to question is far too threatening. The real truth could turn out to be very ugly and some just can't face that.
OMG a TRUTHER!!!! LOL
Come on Down Honey! I've already blown so many truthers out of the water one more will be like....toooo easy!
So tell me now, what made the WTC towers collapse???
Why did the infamous Building Seven fall down?
Start pitching 'em......
Maybe we should send in a ****load of sleeper cells to do terrorist attacks against the al Qaeda govt in Libya. Just to **** with their heads.
to your valid questions:
personally I do not know. I was not privy to the forensics and evidence .