NATO nations set to reap spoils of Libya war
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
So why the apology here.
That's exactly what i did.
Yes. But when you're confronted by dissension, you get to bullying.
No you don't.
That's up to you.
I told you what I am looking for. Believe as you wish. We have already had a set to re: cherrypicking (re: observe) thus I am guilty of assuming a repeat based on prior performance.
Apology sent.
Apology sent.
Where were these nations when the Lockerbie Pan Am bombing took place and Libya later accepted the responsibility for that tragedy. Many others too. Now there must be some big spoils involved to warrant a Summit type meeting in Paris. How about OIL? And I don't mean the Palm Oil either.
They probably think one of them is Gaddafi. He is the master of illusion, after all.
Animation: Where's Gadhafi? - YouTube
Last edited:
Libya: Another country for NATO to take root in
Libya: NATO Acquires Military Outpost In Third Continent
who woulda thunk it??:roll:
that seems to be the formula for the :"west'
Invade , regime change , promise the invaded population "freedom" slaughter a lot of men, women, children all the while gaining control of land for more military bases......so that the shadow of the invader always hangs over the people as a reminder. to whom they should be beholding to for "freeing " them Do lots of "selective " photo ops for the media so the folks back home will continue to support the war machine.
so bottom line: WHO BENEFITS??? ( those in fantasyland will say "everyone" and consider themselves "saviors" and "do gooders" for the world.
**sigh
Libya: NATO Acquires Military Outpost In Third Continent
who woulda thunk it??:roll:
that seems to be the formula for the :"west'
Invade , regime change , promise the invaded population "freedom" slaughter a lot of men, women, children all the while gaining control of land for more military bases......so that the shadow of the invader always hangs over the people as a reminder. to whom they should be beholding to for "freeing " them Do lots of "selective " photo ops for the media so the folks back home will continue to support the war machine.
so bottom line: WHO BENEFITS??? ( those in fantasyland will say "everyone" and consider themselves "saviors" and "do gooders" for the world.
**sigh
That backs up the article written by the professor I posted.
Why is NATO in Yugoslavia? by Sean Gervasi
It's an older article about Yugoslavia but obviously applies here as well..
However, the sending of NATO troops into the Balkans is the result of enormous pressure for the general extension of NATO eastwards.
If the Yugoslav enterprise is the first concrete step in the expansion of NATO, others are planned for the near future. Some Western powers want to bring the Visegrad countries (2) into NATO as full members by the end of the century. There was resistance to the pressures for such extension among certain Western countries for some time. However, the recalcitrants have now been bludgeoned into accepting the alleged necessity of extending NATO.
The question is: why are the Western powers pressing for the expansion of NATO? Why is NATO being renewed and extended when the "Soviet threat" has disappeared? There is clearly much more to it than we have so far been told. The enforcement of a precarious peace in Bosnia is only the immediate reason for sending NATO forces into the Balkans.
recommended reading...
thanks for the read. and agree, that we the collective population has very little knowledge as to all that is going on
an aside.....but there appears to be more "secrecy" now when it comes to information flow. On the grounds of "national security " of couse. (sarcasm alert)
Many horrfic atrocities have been and continue to take place under the label of "national security " or the implication that when a nation is at war different rules come into play .......some of which tread over our rights.
.
an aside.....but there appears to be more "secrecy" now when it comes to information flow. On the grounds of "national security " of couse. (sarcasm alert)
Many horrfic atrocities have been and continue to take place under the label of "national security " or the implication that when a nation is at war different rules come into play .......some of which tread over our rights.
.
Sean Gervasi, according to Wiki....
"He was appointed the Hunter/Zakin screenwriting chair at UCLA and taught there in spring 2009."
He is a professor........of writing fiction.
It is almost too funny...
Sean Gervasi, according to Wiki....
"He was appointed the Hunter/Zakin screenwriting chair at UCLA and taught there in spring 2009."
He is a professor........of writing fiction.
It is almost too funny...
Nice catch Colpy. Abby actually got this article from a website called Emperors-Clothes. The owner of the the webpage goes into great details of his views. He is actually a supporter of Milosevic and the Serbs and thinks they got a raw deal. He also claims that the photos of emaciated Muslims in Bosnian Concentration Camps were fake.
This is from that guys website...
" I was very much impressed with Slobodan Milosevic. Here was this President of a small country, standing up to U.S. envoy Richard Holbrook and his huge NATO forces. Every day Holbrook publicly threatened to bomb Yugoslavia - which of course was by definition terrorism - and Milosevic handled it brilliantly. He would start to give in, then hold firm, then retreat, then advance. It was like watching David stand up to Goliath. And then it dawned on me: he was buying time, using every chance to get his message out to wake up the world."
Editorial Board of Emperor's Clothes
Sean Gervasi, according to Wiki....
"He was appointed the Hunter/Zakin screenwriting chair at UCLA and taught there in spring 2009."
He is a professor........of writing fiction.
It is almost too funny...
Unfortunately nothing in the article is fiction.
OJ - - murder of ex wife. Innocent or guilty
Bump - Bump and Bump again - Oh yes - Why are Powell & Rice so innocent reference the war in Iraq.