What if there is enough DNA sample only for one test, and not for three tests?
S.J. Is it your reading or your eyesight that is deficient? In my question to Ron, I asked emphatically "where there is enough D.N.A."
What if there is enough DNA sample only for one test, and not for three tests?
so.... you have no problem with killing someone you think is guilty, even if it is proven after the fact the that person was innocent.
or some people do not deserve the gift of life, and a kiddly diddler is the only one I can think of that fits that category.
As I see it when one commits a crime one forfits any "rights" that others enjoy, particularily when the crime is eliminating someone elses right to life.That is where we disagree. Everybody deserves the right to life (it is not a ‘gift’, it is not yours or anybody else’s to give). I don’t think anybody ahs the right to take a human life (except perhaps in self defense).
That is where we disagree. Everybody deserves the right to life (it is not a ‘gift’, it is not yours or anybody else’s to give). I don’t think anybody ahs the right to take a human life (except perhaps in self defense).
I do agree with the following: The Florida law holds that a crime victim may “stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary.” To defend homes and vehicles, an owner can wield lethal force with a freedom not granted to the police.
I can see where lawyers and judges would have some fun with the definition of "reasonably."
Always good to hear the opinion of a real man..As I see it when one commits a crime one forfits any "rights" that others enjoy, particularily when the crime is eliminating someone elses right to life.
And this is where the death penalty comes in. It is the self defense of law abiding citizens to protect themselves from those with no respect for others.
If our prisons were run more along the Mexican model I might agree that life with no parole is a better solution than the death penalty.
I do agree with the following: The Florida law holds that a crime victim may “stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary.” To defend homes and vehicles, an owner can wield lethal force with a freedom not granted to the police.
After how long of a cooling off period?And that is EXACTLY the way it should be....acquiescence in the face of aggression is simply stupid........or at least the decision to surrender or resist should be left to the individual.....not the state.
After how long of a cooling off period?
Check into whether families of victims really feel better a few years after an execution or not.
They will ALL say the same thing...."it never brought back my beloved so and so".
At first.Not all! This statement is wrong in so many ways.
Would bring great pleasure to many to see and hear some pos take his/her last breath that brought harm to their child.
The criminal justice system's emphasis on executions and the inevitible media coverage often create an impression that the much sought after resolution will come with the prisoner's execution, but the death penalty keeps the case alive for years, forcing the family to endure numerous appeals and parole board meetings. When the execution date arrives, if viewing the execution does not bring about the healing or closure expected, the family members may become even more skeptical about the healing process. Watching violence does not likely bring about healing. "We're talking about revenge, and it's not clear to me that revenge changes one's long term ability to deal with loss," stated one psychiatrist.[SIZE=-2][14][/SIZE] "Every culture has a different way of mourning, but witnessing executions isn't one of them."[SIZE=-2][15][/SIZE]Not all! This statement is wrong in so many ways.
Would bring great pleasure to many to see and hear some pos take his/her last breath that brought harm to their child.
Yeah right. The gunslingers solution. Sort of hard to prove that a guy you detest steps one foot on your property and you blast his brains out. Pretty stupid if you ask me...And that is EXACTLY the way it should be....acquiescence in the face of aggression is simply stupid........or at least the decision to surrender or resist should be left to the individual.....not the state.
After how long of a cooling off period?
Check into whether families of victims really feel better a few years after an execution or not.
They will ALL say the same thing...."it never brought back my beloved so and so".
I do agree with the following: The Florida law holds that a crime victim may “stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary.” To defend homes and vehicles, an owner can wield lethal force with a freedom not granted to the police.
Some are vengeful. Some are forgiving. Some don't respond at all and go into deep depression. Not everyone is the same.Not all! This statement is wrong in so many ways.
Would bring great pleasure to many to see and hear some pos take his/her last breath that brought harm to their child.
One murder, two murders. Whats the difference?I wasn't talking about execution. I do not support the re-introduction of the Death Penalty........except perhaps for multiple murderers.....