It's time to bring the death penalty back!
- Thread starter Simpleton
- Start date
I agree that these sick offenders should be put in with the main population in prison. Turn a blind eye and let their peers take care of the sickos.
We shouldn't be wasting money protecting them.
If they were inadvertantly placed in with the General Pop and came to harm that would be one thing, but to deliberately place them there to ensure harm is a little bit chicken sh*t. One thing that might work is to put them in a room with the father of the victim (at the father's descretion) would be a more proper way to do it. Letting prisoners do it doesn't quite square with the old adage "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
And put in a decent and mature way. I like this post....common sense & decency.
No reason to argue, debate, or otherwise, because my mind is not going to be swayed, or changed on this subject know need to.
Like I said unless you have been, or knows of someone who has been a victim of a pedophile, you really have no leg to stand on, and go by the status quo, or what makes you a nice guy. I have no need to play nice guy when it comes to low lifes like a pedophile, nor do I want to house them,,, they are not fixable.
Special protection??????????????????? You mean allowed to be massacred while beng outnumbered by a bunch of other felons??????????? Yeah, right.
Yep, that's one of the characteristics of a convicted criminal- no interest at being any place on the "nobility" scale except to be second worst.
The Off-Topic Left-Right Political Side-Tracking has been removed.
Please stick to the Thread Topic to avoid your posts being removed.
Thank You.
Please stick to the Thread Topic to avoid your posts being removed.
Thank You.
Well none of us are without sin.
I did not come here to debate the issue, I have felt this way for years, so in no way will change my opinion. And respect those with same. No time for bleeding hearts. Yes bring back the death penalty for all who dare to harm a child in any way.
I did not come here to debate the issue, I have felt this way for years, so in no way will change my opinion. And respect those with same. No time for bleeding hearts. Yes bring back the death penalty for all who dare to harm a child in any way.
so.... you have no problem with killing someone you think is guilty, even if it is proven after the fact the that person was innocent.
DNA....yes....but every step in the chain of evidence up to and including
maliciousness and incompetence and corruption in that chain of evidence?
No...'cuz even with DNA is the human element with all of its pettiness and
stupidity to influence the outcome of any events to fit a preconceived
perception regardless of the evidence.
Last edited:
Just one question Ron. Where there is enough D.N.A. found why couldn't it be split into three separate portions to be processed by three separate teams, each team unknown to the other two teams? It's probably not that simple, I know but if not why not?
Great Idea....but one guy (perhaps with an agenda) collects that original DNA that would be divided into three parts to be examined by those three teams....
Maybe the DNA collected isn't the DNA submitted...but that of the most likely
suspect with the original DNA taken from a victim to sit in a box in an evidence
locker for the next couple of decades...but the DNA submitted is a perfect match
for the most likely subject regardless of the original evidence to the 99.99999%.
Go figure.
Once the human element is involved, anything is possible.
It has done nothing of the sort. DNA evidence can be planted at the scene of the crime, just like any other evidence.
That is simple. ‘Harm’ is what the society considers to be harmful (by society of course, the majority). Same way, ‘child’ is what society considers to be a child (in Ontario, that is anybody less than 19 years old).
E.g. a child who shows gay tendencies, if his parents encourage him to find his own sexuality, it could quite conceivably be considered as harming the child, and presumably deserving of death penalty.
Fortunately, we have the constitution and the Charter to keep out such nonsense. The term ‘harm’ and ‘child’ are very subjective and mean what one wants them to mean.