Well - slightly derrogatory reference but yes. Essentially that is the benefit. And also provide resources for the children of the men who don't come back from that war even if the war is won.
2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Weird tangent, but Sociopathic behaviour & Serial Killers are not a new phenomenon either….& yet they seem to crop up regularly also. Care to speculate as to their potential benefit (or not causing it harm) is to the human population as a whole, or how it fits in the ‘not causing it harm’ trait regarding Darwinian Evolutionary theory?
A serial killer in a population of 200 people would be difficult to hide, but not in a population of 2,000,000 so is this a fairly (let say the last 10,000 years) recent phenomenon?
Well... keeps us on our toes doesn't it
That's always a good thing survival wise I haven't actually studied the cause of those things nearly as much so it's a little harder to say, but frankly a trait where the person is prepared to do anything for their own happiness and survival sounds like something that might enjoy at least limited success evolutionarily speakng
And most likely it's within the standard deviation of our brain model.
No, it's just that back in the day they tended to become chief or emperor or some damn thing.
It was less of a detriment and more of a marketable skill.Joking aside, there was an absolute SHIT tonne of unprovoked killings in the day. And no "police" to go after bad guys if they ran away. Some societies had better infrastructure for that than others but none were great as a rule. I mean seriously, what were the vikings other than people who went out and murdered folk for fun and profit?
And while there might be indications that people were being murdered it might actually be hard to say that it was a 'mass' murderer. Even today it's not like they kill every other day or once a week. So if two or three times a year someone goes missing, was it bandits? Romans? That peddler that just passed through last week? one of us? an animal? did they get lost?
And if it did happen, and they did catch the person, we'd never likely hear about it most of the time. Small communities like that did not keep much in the way of records, there was no 'newspaper' (or any paper for that matter).
Having said that, there are some recorded. I found this which might be interesting:
10 Forgotten Serial Killers From The Middle Ages - Listverse
Serial killers are a special kind of evil. Since being coined by FBI investigator Robert Ressler, the term “serial killer” has come to denote any murderer
listverse.com
"The best way to end discrimination is not to discriminate." Righties love saying that.
So. . . we gonna do that, or are they just blowing air? Girls' and boys' sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms are every bit as unlawful under the Civil Rights Acts (which forbid discrimination on the basis of sex in the same list as race) as separate "White" and "Colored" programs and facilities.
So. . . we gonna do that, or are they just blowing air? Girls' and boys' sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms are every bit as unlawful under the Civil Rights Acts (which forbid discrimination on the basis of sex in the same list as race) as separate "White" and "Colored" programs and facilities.
Every now and then down hereabouts, women get sick of the lines at public bathrooms and sashay into the men's.JFC you're gonna start a riot with that post
More rarely, the cops are dumb enough to arrest 'em.
Every once in a while, ya find a DA with his eye on the governor's mansion who'll prosecute.
Whereupon (so far), a judge tells him "Not going there. Not in my court. Make it go away, counsel."
So if I piss on the lawn and I'm seen will I be arrested for exposing myself? Fuck yes. Why? Who did I offend?
The way jolly olde England got rich. There was no real difference between a pirate and a privateer except a piece of paper from the crown.Well... keeps us on our toes doesn't it
I haven't actually studied the cause of those things nearly as much so it's a little harder to say, but frankly a trait where the person is prepared to do anything for their own happiness and survival sounds like something that might enjoy at least limited success evolutionarily speakng
And most likely it's within the standard deviation of our brain model.
No, it's just that back in the day they tended to become chief or emperor or some damn thing.
Joking aside, there was an absolute SHIT tonne of unprovoked killings in the day. And no "police" to go after bad guys if they ran away. Some societies had better infrastructure for that than others but none were great as a rule. I mean seriously, what were the vikings other than people who went out and murdered folk for fun and profit?
And while there might be indications that people were being murdered it might actually be hard to say that it was a 'mass' murderer. Even today it's not like they kill every other day or once a week. So if two or three times a year someone goes missing, was it bandits? Romans? That peddler that just passed through last week? one of us? an animal? did they get lost?
And if it did happen, and they did catch the person, we'd never likely hear about it most of the time. Small communities like that did not keep much in the way of records, there was no 'newspaper' (or any paper for that matter).
Having said that, there are some recorded. I found this which might be interesting:
10 Forgotten Serial Killers From The Middle Ages - Listverse
Serial killers are a special kind of evil. Since being coined by FBI investigator Robert Ressler, the term “serial killer” has come to denote any murderer
Truth. THe ability to slaughter indiscriminately, kill and rape women and children and loot and plunder has always been a highly marketable and successful skill throughout history
When we think of the great leaders of history we think of people like Khan, Caesar, Napoleon, Richard the lionhearted, etc etc. All took great pleasure in slaughtering the bejeezuz out of people.RIghties never say that. What righties say is that people should be equal, which is not the same as "being the same ".
There's nothing wrong with actually acknowledging physical differences. THat's not 'discrimination'. Are you "discriminating' when you put in a ramp for wheelchair people? I mean, you're saying they have to use that instead of the stairs like everyone else soooooo......
So differentiating between groups isn't ipso facto discrimination. WE don't let children drink at the bar. That's not 'ageist". Discrimination is where you treat someone differently ONLY because they're a different colour, sex, religion etc etc.
So in each case you would have to look at WHY a distinction is being made. In the case of kids and booze we would say that the child would suffer serious harm the adult wouldn't, and is not capable of making a rational "adult" informed decision on the matter, therefore it's not about discrimination.
Rarely is anything black and white, and sometimes you try to argue by presenting things in that light. Either there's NO differentiating humans or ALL must be put into groups and differentiated! Well the reality is a lot more nuanced.
Righties say that all the time whenever anybody suggests anything that might be limited to or favor anybody who's not White and male.
That's right, folks, he's saying that women can't use the stalls in a men's bathroom. Physically impossible.
We don't want dem wimmins in our shitters, theirs are messier than any mens room. Am I dicriminating?
I'm pretty sure you have literally never discriminated in your life.
All I know is Jesus hung out with twelve dudes and a hooker.
And don't give me that crap about "Hey, they were a minor-league hockey team!"
And don't give me that crap about "Hey, they were a minor-league hockey team!"