Angry Libyan mob kills U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three diplomates.

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Some members are getting it...

So, the guy who produced the film just spun a wheel and randomly came up with Islam to spoof? How can you in good faith not see a connection between the riots, protests, demands, insults, etc. etc. that have been going on for decades, and the film maker's choice of topic? You believe it was just chance that the film wasn't about Krishna, or Christ, or Buddha?

However, going forward every attack will be blamed on the video..

[youtube]76STxsWJCCE[/youtube]

[youtube]fIrcNL9PfUU[/youtube]

Limit Muslim migration, Australia warned - National - smh.com.au
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
When a video is made that mocks a group of people's beliefs and there is loss of life the video makers should be held responsible
 
Last edited:

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
For those posting along in the short bus:


The 9/11 attacks on the US embassies were not about a movie



Here are a couple of facts:

On June 4 the White House confirmed that the US had killed Abu Yahya Al-Libi - OBL's Libyan lietenant who had moved into Al Qaeda's #2 spot after Ayman Zahawiri after the Navy SEALs whacked OBL.


On Tuesday 9/11, a tape was released of Zawahiri announcing that Libi had been killed earlier this year by a US drone attack. The Zawahiri tape was made during Ramadan which ended in the middle of last month. Zawahiri called for his terrorist underlings to avenge Libi's death and especially exhorted Libyans to take revenge.


The attack in Libya was well planned and executed. It wasn't about a spontaneous protest against some ridiculous internet movie of Muhammad. The assailants came armed to the teeth, with among other things, RPG 7s. They knew that the US Ambassador was in Benghazi rather than Tripoli. They knew how to track his movements, and were able to strike against him after he and his colleagues left the consulate building and tried to flee in a car. As Israel Channel 2's Arab Affairs Correspondent Ehud Yaari noted this evening, you don't often see well trained terrorists participating in protests of movies.


Then there is the attack in Cairo. They were led by Mohammad Zawahiri - Ayman Zawahiri's brother. According the Thomas Josclyn in the Weekly Standard, the US media has been idiotically presenting him as some sort of moderate despite the fact that in an interview with Al Jazeerah he said said, "We in al Qaeda..."


Egypt's US supported Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi recently released Zawahiri from Egyptian prison. The same Barack Obama who has no time in his schedule to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu next week in New York, is scheduled to meet Morsi.


The Egyptian government has not condemned the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo. But Morsi is demanding that the US government prosecute the film's creator.



You may be wondering how some movie no one's heard of has caused such a hullabaloo. Well, as it turns out, the film was screened on an Egyptian Salafist television channel. Obviously the Salafists -- many of whom, like Zawahiri were released from prison by Morsi, wanted to stir up anti-US violence on the eve of 9/11. So if the film is responsible for the violence, a finger needs to be pointed to its chief distributor -- Al Qaida's Egyptian friends and members.


With these facts in hand, it is clear that the attempts to present these acts of war against the US as the consequence of some stupid nothing movie are obscene attempts to deflect the blame for these unwarranted attacks onto their victims and away from their perpetrators.

Caroline Glick :: The 9/11 attacks on the US embassies were not about a movie
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Well you have your opinion.. as wrong as it is..
My opinion is supported by case law and the US Constitution.

Yours is resting on your prostate.

let's just see how it plays out, they are questioning him.. I bet you the US Gov't finds some way of charging this guy..
Likely with breach of court order.

bait and troll.. someone else.. you're boring. TROLL
Just because I point out how stupid your posts are, doesn't make me a troll.

When a video is made that mocks a group of people's beliefs and there is loss of life the video makers should be held responsible
Oh look, another idiot, lol.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
When a video is made that mocks a group of people's beliefs and there is loss of life the video makers should be held responsible

No, the people whose beliefs were mocked need to grow up.

This mohammed guy must be pretty pathetic if he has to have his followers kill people just for laughing at him.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
When a video is made that mocks a group of people's beliefs and there is loss of life the video makers should be held responsible
Yeah, and when a drunk kills someone with his Chevy, GM should be held responsible.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
ra·tion·al·ize

   [rash-uh-nl-ahyz, rash-nl-ahyz] Show IPA verb, ra·tion·al·ized, ra·tion·al·iz·ing.
verb (used with object) 1. to ascribe (one's acts, opinions, etc.) to causes that superficially seem reasonable and valid but that actually are unrelated to the true, possibly unconscious and often less creditable or agreeable causes.

2. to remove unreasonable elements from.


lib·er·al·ism

   [lib-er-uh-liz-uhm, lib-ruh-] Show IPA
noun 1. a mental disorder.

2. see 1.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Do you believe everything the US government tells you? Always have to watch for spin.
In the 80's satellite photos were published that showed underground rivers, old roads deeply buried under the sands of North Africa.
It was a message to the USSR that the US knew exactly where all their missile silos were located.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
More for our intellectual and moral superiors to gag on. :lol:

Libyan President: “Unfounded And Preposterous” To Think Attack On U.S. Consulate Was “Spontaneous Protest”…



Don’t tell that to the Obama administration, who reiterated this insane position this morning.
Via Weekly Standard:
Libyan president Mohammed el-Megarif is saying the attack Benghazi that killed the American ambassador was planned well beforehand. His statements on this topic firmly contradict the Obama administration’s version of events.

The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous,” Megarif says in an interview on NPR. “We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. Consulate.”
Keep reading…


Libyan President: “Unfounded And Preposterous” To Think Attack On U.S. Consulate Was “Spontaneous Protest”… | Weasel Zippers

 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Just about everyone on the planet could see that the Arab Spring came with a whole lot of uncertainty. No one knew what would shake out after or in the near future, but it is what it is. Unless you support propping up dictators (which is what fueled most of the hatred to begin with) this kind of violence can be expected. Frankly the US should stop donating to those meatheads and allow them to blow themselves up. Cheaper.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
More for our intellectual and moral superiors to gag on. :lol:

Libyan President: “Unfounded And Preposterous” To Think Attack On U.S. Consulate Was “Spontaneous Protest”…



Don’t tell that to the Obama administration, who reiterated this insane position this morning.
Via Weekly Standard:
Libyan president Mohammed el-Megarif is saying the attack Benghazi that killed the American ambassador was planned well beforehand. His statements on this topic firmly contradict the Obama administration’s version of events.

The idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous,” Megarif says in an interview on NPR. “We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. Consulate.”
Keep reading…


Libyan President: “Unfounded And Preposterous” To Think Attack On U.S. Consulate Was “Spontaneous Protest”… | Weasel Zippers


No accounting for stupid now is there.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Just about everyone on the planet could see that the Arab Spring came with a whole lot of uncertainty. No one knew what would shake out after or in the near future, but it is what it is. Unless you support propping up dictators (which is what fueled most of the hatred to begin with) this kind of violence can be expected. Frankly the US should stop donating to those meatheads and allow them to blow themselves up. Cheaper.

Well, if you vote in the west chances are you are supporting dictatorial powers slathered in cheese whiz to improve the taste. It isn't cheese though. The USA never donated a single thing to any nation unless it had a fuze or it was poison. The world is about to stop donating to the USA. That is the yankee pig dog problem. Where the beef goink to come frum?
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
EAO
This is just a taste of what you support
Iran foundation boosts reward to $3.3-million for death of author Rushdie, after Prophet

TEHRAN, Iran — A semi-official religious foundation in Iran has increased a reward it had offered for the killing of British author Salman Rushdie to $3.3 million from $2.8 million, a newspaper reported, days after protests coursed through the Muslim world over alleged insults to the Prophet Muhammad.

Hardline Jomhoori Eslami daily and other newspapers reported on Sunday that the move appeared to be linked to protests over an amateurish anti-Islam film, which crowds in some 20 countries said drove them to defend their faith — in some cases by attacking American embassies.

Iran’s hardliners say Khomeini’s fatwa is “irrevocable.”

In 1998, the Iranian government declared it would not support the fatwa, but at the same time the government said it could not rescind the edict, since under Islamic law, that could be done only by the person who issued it. Khomeini died in June 1989.

Khomeini’s fatwa sent Rushdie into hiding under police protection, but that didn’t stop him from writing more novels. In 1990, he published an apology and reiterated his respect for Islam.

Also on Sunday, thousands of clerics gathered in seminaries across Iran to protest the anti-Islamic movie, state TV reported.

Ahmad Khatami, an ally of the country’s top leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told a gathering in In the holy city of Qom, 130 kilometres south of the capital Tehran, that the United States and Israel were the “main suspects” in the case.

His remarks prompted “death to Israel and ”down with the U.S.“ chants by demonstrators.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
"Khomeini’s fatwa sent Rushdie into hiding under police protection, but that didn’t stop him from writing more novels. In 1990, he published an apology and reiterated his respect for Islam."

I agree Rushdie should be stopped from writing. “death to Israel and ”down with the U.S.“ That's the most popular song on the charts today.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
"Khomeini’s fatwa sent Rushdie into hiding under police protection, but that didn’t stop him from writing more novels. In 1990, he published an apology and reiterated his respect for Islam."

I agree Rushdie should be stopped from writing. “death to Israel and ”down with the U.S.“ That's the most popular song on the charts today.

If they come for him what about you.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
First Amendment to the United States Constitution

In the area of free speech, does the right to speak your mind include the right to use offensive language that could start a fight or incite a riot?

.

So we ... as Americans should redifine our 1st Ammendment because it upsets people in other countries? lol. Seriously?

Insult whoever you want unless they freak out. If they freak out you are committing a crime. If they remain passive it is OK.

Brilliant!

When a video is made that mocks a group of people's beliefs and there is loss of life the video makers should be held responsible

So all people who are offended by videos should take to the streets and kill. That way they won't be offended any longer. Thuggery rules... tolerance and reason takes a back seat. Great.