Angry Libyan mob kills U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three diplomates.

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Cause and effect? I'm sorry but that's just a dangerous, dangerous road to go down, in my opinion. That's like blaming the abused spouse for making his/her partner angry enough to beat them. If only she hadn't made him angry, the beating would not have happened. If only someone hadn't said something insulting, the killings would not have taken place.

As far as blaming only one side, it's not about sides. Blame for violence belongs on the individuals who perpetrate the violence. Period, end of story. See above example of domestic abuse.
SLM, didn't you get the memo?

It's never the victims fault, if we aren't talking about America, or the west, or Israel.

If we are, moral relativism makes "blaming the victim", is Okay!
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
SLM, didn't you get the memo?

It's never the victims fault, if we aren't talking about America, or the west, or Israel.

If we are, moral relativism makes "blaming the victim", is Okay!

Bah! Memos! I don't read no stinkin' memos. ;)

No one should have to tread carefully in how they express themselves because simply someone might be offended, whether it's likely or not to happen. That's holding people hostage to ones own instability.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Bah! Memos! I don't read no stinkin' memos. ;)

No one should have to tread carefully in how they express themselves because simply someone might be offended, whether it's likely or not to happen. That's holding people hostage to ones own instability.
Yer preaching to the choir sis.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Cause and effect? I'm sorry but that's just a dangerous, dangerous road to go down, in my opinion. That's like blaming the abused spouse for making his/her partner angry enough to beat them. If only she hadn't made him angry, the beating would not have happened. If only someone hadn't said something insulting, the killings would not have taken place.

As far as blaming only one side, it's not about sides. Blame for violence belongs on the individuals who perpetrate the violence. Period, end of story. See above example of domestic abuse.


That was great.

Seriously... she KNOWS if she makes him mad he'll beat her... its her fault. And if he beats the kids or puts his fist through the wall... well that is her fault too. She HAS to know that by now! When will she learn!

BULL SH**!
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
That was great.

Seriously... she KNOWS if she makes him mad he'll beat her... its her fault. And if he beats the kids or puts his fist through the wall... well that is her fault too. She HAS to know that by now! When will she learn!

BULL SH**!

To assess the logic of any position, all you have to do is apply that same logic to a different (but similar enough) situation. If the reasoning is sound, it will hold up. If it doesn't hold up, well that says it all doesn't it?
 

JaneBlonde

Nominee Member
Aug 30, 2012
70
0
6
Earlier today, mobs of protesters in Yemen broke out their crazy and attacked the U.S. embassy in Sanaa. Torching cars, smashing the main gates, and tossing rocks while shouting "We sacrifice ourselves for you, Messenger of God." The loons, like the loons who stormed the embassy in Cairo and the U.S. Consulate in Libya, are protesting that same stupid movie.

This is getting repetitive. Running around like loons isn't sacrificing yourself, it's sacrificing your fellow citizens and people by giving others a reason to think you're all in the crazy pot together.

If you REALLY want to sacrifice yourself, find the nearest cliff and take a flying leap.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66

State Dept 'had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged consulate in Benghazi'...

Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'

The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal.

American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential.

The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the "safe house" in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed "safe".


more


Revealed: inside story of US envoy's assassination - World Politics - World - The Independent


'There were 400 attackers'...
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
I think a lot of people are looking at the result - the burning of the embassies, killing of diplomats - and forgetting the reason.

To me, the reason is that some moron willfully and with total disregard to anyone's life made a movie that was questionable about the Islamic Prophet.

It doesn't matter that Christians have had movies made to poke fun of Jesus; that's not the point. The most anyone's going to get is the crazy right protest, bitch, moan and complain and that's it. Maybe a lunatic crackpot break open his weapons and kill someone, but that would be rare.

The point is this guy knew there would be a reaction - likely negative - and did not give two fks about it.

Honestly, I'm sick of innocent people paying for the stupidity of others with their lives. To me this "director" on purpose made this movie for the precise reason to stir the crap-pot the Middle East is in, cause chaos all to prove that "Islam is Evil". Whether it's Evil or not is moot, the fact he provoked this is worse, it's totally despicable and inhumane.

I think by now the world - those who aren't Muslim - "know" that the life of Muhammad is questionable. So there's no need, at all, for films, books and so on to be done when the reaction is this overreactive.

It's like poking a chained, rabid dog. Poke it enough in it's insanity it will break free somehow and bite the holy hell out of you and you get rabies. Guess what, it's your fault, AND it's your fault that the dog goes on to bite others. And if one person dies of it, you're the dipstick who should be held accountable.

So should this guy.

(I'm not saying the reactions of the people should be ignored - hell, they need to be dealt with ASAP; what happened was just as stupid as the film itself, just as despicable, just as thoughtless. But truthfully, come on, there's no such thing as "We didn't know they'd react like that" when it comes to Islam.)

Bull crap. Murder because someone poked fun at your favorite myth is over the top.If they don't like it they don't have to watch the movie. You are taking political correctness too far.

Not my issue if no one seems to look at the "cause/effect" of all this, and totally blame one side and not everyone involved.

Again, I'm not saying that the idiots who rioted in Libya or anywhere else deserve to be let off the hook; they don't and they shouldn't be. But to be "shocked" that they reacted like this, when people know how they react over insults to their Prophet? Give your collective heads a shake.

I just think this idiot director willfully and without any care what so ever to the repercussions did this movie to piss off the Muslims, this is the result, and he should be held accountable for it. Honestly don't care if it's a good opinion to have, or popular; the moron deserves to be held accountable for his act in this.

MAking a movie that some terrorist in a foreign country does not like is not a crime. Murdering people because you think your god is better than theirs is.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,882
2,744
113
New Brunswick
Wow, looks like this is more and more a "done on purpose" thing after all.

News from The Associated Press

Oh really? So he should be held accountable? So... he committed a crime? What is the punishment Serryah? What are future punishments for all who offend muslims and muslims only?

Yeah, he should be held accountable. What crime? Don't know, not a lawyer. Punishment? Not sure, but I still think that he did it on purpose and as such, he should be held somehow accountable. And where have I said any form of punishment should be only for those who offend muslims and muslims only? Sorry, didn't say that; discussing my opinions on other religions would be another topic entirely.

Cause and effect? I'm sorry but that's just a dangerous, dangerous road to go down, in my opinion. That's like blaming the abused spouse for making his/her partner angry enough to beat them. If only she hadn't made him angry, the beating would not have happened. If only someone hadn't said something insulting, the killings would not have taken place.

Oh please, spousal abuse is not a comparison to this at all. If you're going to throw out crap analogies, don't expect a reply.

As far as blaming only one side, it's not about sides. Blame for violence belongs on the individuals who perpetrate the violence. Period, end of story. See above example of domestic abuse.

BS it's not about sides; when it comes to that part of the world, it's a total "us vs them" thing, so yes, it is about sides. I do agree blame belongs to the people who perpetuated the violence and I hope that they're punished for whatever involvements they've had in the deaths of the innocents. BUT, again, if this "director" had not made this film with the sole purpose of infuriating the muslims, then it wouldn't have happened to begin with. It's not like we don't KNOW how they get in the Middle East when you say anything bad about their prophet. This idiot is just as blame worthy as the ones who caused the violence.
Bull crap. Murder because someone poked fun at your favorite myth is over the top.If they don't like it they don't have to watch the movie. You are taking political correctness too far.

Murder because someone pokes fun at a myth is over the top, I agree and if this were the case, I'd be all for seeing what's due go to the people who caused the crime. When that someone does so ON PURPOSE KNOWING the reaction will lead to violence is a whole other story. They don't have to watch it; soon as it's known, to them, it's "kill the heretics!" As for being PC, please. I hate the whole political correctness BS and wish it was done away with. My opinion has nothing to do with or is anything about being PC, it's about being sick and bloody tired of all this violence done to innocents because some dipstick has to go and jab the wasp nest just a little more to prove the Muslims are fking nuts.

MAking a movie that some terrorist in a foreign country does not like is not a crime. Murdering people because you think your god is better than theirs is.

Nope, not a crime, agreed. Murdering people because you think your god is better than theirs is, again I agree.

Neither of these address the point.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,679
14,375
113
Low Earth Orbit


Fight the pigs!​
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
15 Photos Of Libyans Apologizing To Americans





15 Photos Of Libyans Apologizing To Americans



and...


The 9/11 attacks on the US embassies were not about a movie




Here are a couple of facts:
On June 4 the White House confirmed that the US had killed Abu Yahya Al-Libi - OBL's Libyan lietenant who had moved into Al Qaeda's #2 spot after Ayman Zahawiri after the Navy SEALs whacked OBL.


On Tuesday 9/11, a tape was released of Zawahiri announcing that Libi had been killed earlier this year by a US drone attack. The Zawahiri tape was made during Ramadan which ended in the middle of last month. Zawahiri called for his terrorist underlings to avenge Libi's death and especially exhorted Libyans to take revenge.


The attack in Libya was well planned and executed. It wasn't about a spontaneous protest against some ridiculous internet movie of Muhammad. The assailants came armed to the teeth, with among other things, RPG 7s. They knew that the US Ambassador was in Benghazi rather than Tripoli. They knew how to track his movements, and were able to strike against him after he and his colleagues left the consulate building and tried to flee in a car. As Israel Channel 2's Arab Affairs Correspondent Ehud Yaari noted this evening, you don't often see well trained terrorists participating in protests of movies.


Then there is the attack in Cairo. They were led by Mohammad Zawahiri - Ayman Zawahiri's brother. According the Thomas Josclyn in the Weekly Standard, the US media has been idiotically presenting him as some sort of moderate despite the fact that in an interview with Al Jazeerah he said said, "We in al Qaeda..."


Egypt's US supported Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi recently released Zawahiri from Egyptian prison. The same Barack Obama who has no time in his schedule to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu next week in New York, is scheduled to meet Morsi.


The Egyptian government has not condemned the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo. But Morsi is demanding that the US government prosecute the film's creator.



You may be wondering how some movie no one's heard of has caused such a hullabaloo. Well, as it turns out, the film was screened on an Egyptian Salafist television channel. Obviously the Salafists -- many of whom, like Zawahiri were released from prison by Morsi, wanted to stir up anti-US violence on the eve of 9/11. So if the film is responsible for the violence, a finger needs to be pointed to its chief distributor -- Al Qaida's Egyptian friends and members.


With these facts in hand, it is clear that the attempts to present these acts of war against the US as the consequence of some stupid nothing movie are obscene attempts to deflect the blame for these unwarranted attacks onto their victims and away from their perpetrators.

http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2012/09/the-911-attacks-on-the-us-emba.php

h/t sda
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Yeah, he should be held accountable. What crime? Don't know, not a lawyer. Punishment? Not sure, but I still think that he did it on purpose and as such, he should be held somehow accountable. And where have I said any form of punishment should be only for those who offend muslims and muslims only? Sorry, didn't say that; discussing my opinions on other religions would be another topic entirely.

You don't know? Newsflash... it is NOT a crime. Not at all. He can make whatever movie he wants. Nobody has the right to punish this guy for making this dumb movie.

BTW... have you seen the trailer? It is one of the most idiotic movies I've ever seen. And the ME went bonkers over it.



Oh please, spousal abuse is not a comparison to this at all. If you're going to throw out crap analogies, don't expect a reply.


I can see why you wouldn't want to reply. SLM was right on target.



BS it's not about sides; when it comes to that part of the world, it's a total "us vs them" thing, so yes, it is about sides. I do agree blame belongs to the people who perpetuated the violence and I hope that they're punished for whatever involvements they've had in the deaths of the innocents. BUT, again, if this "director" had not made this film with the sole purpose of infuriating the muslims, then it wouldn't have happened to begin with. It's not like we don't KNOW how they get in the Middle East when you say anything bad about their prophet. This idiot is just as blame worthy as the ones who caused the violence.

Blaming the victims again I see. The US had nothing to do with this movie. Nothing at all.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
U.S. Consulate Attack in Libya Said Twin Operation | World | TIME.com

(BENGHAZI, Libya) — Heavily armed militants used a protest of an anti-Islam film as a cover and may have had help from inside Libyan security in their deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate, a senior Libyan official said Thursday.

As Libya announced the first four arrests, the clearest picture yet emerged of a two-pronged assault with militants screaming “God is great!” as they scaled the consulate’s outer walls and descended on the compound’s main building.

The rampage killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

Eastern Libya’s deputy interior minister, Wanis el-Sharef, said a mob first stormed the consulate Tuesday night and then, hours later, raided a safe house in the compound just as U.S. and Libyan security arrived to evacuate the staff. That suggested, el-Sharef said, that infiltrators within the security forces may have tipped off the militants to the safe house’s location.

The attacks were suspected to have been timed to coincide with the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist strike in the United States, el-Sharef added, with the militants using the film protest by Libyan civilians to mask their action.

Killed in the attack were U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, information management officer Sean Smith, and private security guards Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

El-Sharef said four people were arrested at their homes Thursday, but he refused to give any further details. He said it was too early to say if the suspects belonged to a particular group or what their motive was. Libya’s new prime minister, Mustafa Abu-Shakour, said authorities were looking for more suspects.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
I detest violence... especially when directed at diplomats. At least 13 people died in this attack. I fail to see the point of it.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
I detest violence... especially when directed at diplomats. At least 13 people died in this attack. I fail to see the point of it.

The terrorists that you continually support are making a statement. That being that they will murder anyone that does not comply with their theocracy.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Sam Bacile Muhammad Movie FULL HD - Innocence of Muslims - YouTube

The question that I have can this film maker be charged for inciting a riot causing deaths??

Most people understand that Muslims are an unstable people, why poke a stick at the problem when everyone know they are nuts.

What's happening in the Middle East just shows what a farce their religion of peace is.. LOL