Their Magnificent neighbor to the north

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Argo is just a movie. A movie about how the CIA would have saved the 6 hostages if the Canadian embassey staff hadn't already done that.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Juan It is a movie why are your knickers in a knot?

He's a nationalist!

Not just that... he wants Canada given ALL the credit when it is clear to history that both the CIA and Canada worked together to get this done.

Juan is no different than Affleck if you ask me. Well actually... Ben was just trying (and clearly he succeeded) to make a block buster movie. Juan wants just Canada given all credit it seems. As I said... he's a nationalist... a bitter one at that.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Juan if It is just a movie why are your knickers in a knot?

Who said my knickers were in a knot? My knickers are in perfect shape. You'v already told us
you required paper training. With all the crap you've been spreading here, I can believe it.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
"Hello I'm Ben Affleck... I'm going to p*ss you and a whole bunch of your countrymen off. Shall we get started?"


Who said my knickers were in a knot? My knickers are in perfect shape. You'v already told us
you required paper training. With all the crap you've been spreading here, I can believe it.

"Oh...Oh he so mad"
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Who said my knickers were in a knot? My knickers are in perfect shape. You'v already told us
you required paper training. With all the crap you've been spreading here, I can believe it.

How about reposting that crap as I have no idea of what post(s) you are referring to.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Probably stuff that made him mad. :)

"Their Magnificent neighbor to the north."

That is what he called his thread so that is what you are dealing with. One who is that full of himself and self congratulatory.
 
Last edited:

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Probably stuff that made him mad. :)

"Their Magnificent neighbor to the north."

That is what he called his thread so that is what you are dealing with. One who is that full of himself and self congratulatory.

Not quite. Americans arriving back on this continent
thanked their magnificent neighbor to the north for their rescue.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Read the title of Goober's thread. "Argo- Some Facts behind the movie". Those words didn't come from the article. Those are Goober's words.

If Goober believed what he was posting was a load of BS, then he would have labelled the thread "Argo- the movie is mostly BS" and pointed out the inaccuracies in his referenced C&P. He certainly had enough time to clarify his opinion of the article if he truly believed it was inaccurate, as he started that thread last October.

Normally I wouldn't give a rat's @ss, but because Goober arrogantly bragged about how much more informed he is regarding history than me, then I'm going to make him eat crow for posting a load of provable BS.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Not quite. Americans arriving back on this continent
thanked their magnificent neighbor to the north for their rescue.

It was Self congratulatory and pompous. I read your OP twice before I posted that.

Such arrogance.

Normally I wouldn't give a rat's @ss, but because Goober arrogantly bragged about how much more informed he is regarding history than me, then I'm going to make him eat crow for posting a load of provable BS.

You're gonna make him eat crow for stuff he can prove? lmao

I have a feeling Goober won't be eating crow... just a hunch. You're already off to a bad start.

In the meantime... S*UCK IT!
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
It was Self congratulatory and pompous. I read your OP twice before I posted that.

Maybe a class or two of remedial reading is required. I quoted exactly what the hostages said on national television. I don't have to make things up. I leave that to the likes of you.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Read the title of Goober's thread. "Argo- Some Facts behind the movie". Those words didn't come from the article. Those are Goober's words.

If Goober believed what he was posting was a load of BS, then he would have labelled the thread "Argo- the movie is mostly BS" and pointed out the inaccuracies in his referenced C&P. He certainly had enough time to clarify his opinion of the article if he truly believed it was inaccurate, as he started that thread last October.

Normally I wouldn't give a rat's @ss, but because Goober arrogantly bragged about how much more informed he is regarding history than me, then I'm going to make him eat crow for posting a load of provable BS.
Lordy.....You're now trying to stay afloat using a straw......

Arguing the thread tile....when you have lost on the content...

You are sinking so fast...that not even an appology would help your credibility.....some would say you lost that a long time ago...

But do keep at it.....you are entertaining if nothing else....asBear would say....
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Maybe a class or two of remedial reading is required. I quoted exactly what the hostages said on national television. I don't have to make things up. I leave that to the likes of you.

Yeah I must have missed the foot notes and links in your OP.

But we both know you didn't put any there now did you? So... you were self congratulatory, pompous, and arrogant.

You're doing exactly what you accuse the Americans of doing... exactly.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I doubt it.

... so if I posted a reference to a load of BS...
There's no if about that. You do it all the time. Then you stand behind it 100%, defending it to the point of idiocy, no matter how improbable it is or how many times it's proven erroneous.

Would you like some examples?

... like Goober did...
But he didn't? The title matches the article.

... you guys wouldn't rake me over the coals????
Oh I would. Your hatred just needs to be addressed and you need to be pointed out for what you are, so that anyone that comes along, is aware of who and what you are before they read the Nazi-esque propaganda and hatred you spam this site with.

I hope that helps correct any confusion you may have had.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Read the title of Goober's thread. "Argo- Some Facts behind the movie". Those words didn't come from the article. Those are Goober's words.

If Goober believed what he was posting was a load of BS, then he would have labelled the thread "Argo- the movie is mostly BS" and pointed out the inaccuracies in his referenced C&P. He certainly had enough time to clarify his opinion of the article if he truly believed it was inaccurate, as he started that thread last October.
Post 294
Normally I wouldn't give a rat's @ss, but because Goober arrogantly bragged about how much more informed he is regarding history than me, then I'm going to make him eat crow for posting a load of provable BS.
I care far more about Ken Taylor's place in history than the Oscars. If you ask anyone under 30 who saw this movie, Argot is... how did Goober put it....the true story of how the CIA safely whisked six U.S. Embassy staffers out of Iran during the 1979 hostage crisis .



Now why would thread have such a Title as Some Facts behind the movie.
I bolded the part about Spielberg as if showed that the CIA front worked as it was supposed to.

See how many big movie - as in made money he made before 1979
Steven Spielberg filmography - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now keep on digging that hole.
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
Its hollywood, if you believe that **** than you would know that John Wayne won the "West"!!! :lol: (damit john you use exclamation marks in the wrong contexts, and your spelling is uber pwnzors)
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Read the title of Goober's thread. "Argo- Some Facts behind the movie". Those words didn't come from the article. Those are Goober's words.

If Goober believed what he was posting was a load of BS, then he would have labelled the thread "Argo- the movie is mostly BS" and pointed out the inaccuracies in his referenced C&P. He certainly had enough time to clarify his opinion of the article if he truly believed it was inaccurate, as he started that thread last October.

Normally I wouldn't give a rat's @ss, but because Goober arrogantly bragged about how much more informed he is regarding history than me, then I'm going to make him eat crow for posting a load of provable BS.

I understood you were talking about the link in the thread body - You post so much Bull about myself and others that you should try to be clearer in your posts.
That emotional overload cause you to make so many mistakes, outright lies, twisting historical facts, twisting other members posts. Why do you do that. Self image problem.

Posted here
The True Spy Story Behind Argo - By Nate Jones | Foreign Policy

As I knew the story I had no option but to have an accurate Thread Title. Perhaps you can learn from that when you post a misleading Thread Title- And I must say it is a common occurrence with your Thread Titles and Polls that are junk, biased and plain old crap

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/110514-argo-some-facts-behind-movie.html

Now why would I post- Argo Some facts behind the story- rather simple eh- I knew the story and it left so much out.Tell me Bucky- Why- Why-Why????
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Americans aren't very appreciative are they? If they were appreciative they probably wouldn't be Americans.

So maybe Canadians shouldn't stick their necks out for Americans again?

The fact of the matter is that Canadians will probably always help Americans. It's one of the things that makes you folks our kith and kin.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Americans aren't very appreciative are they? If they were appreciative they probably wouldn't be Americans.

I think we are and we were then as well. I agree with Juan on one thing... after the Canadians helped rescue the six embassy staff the country was awash in thanks for Canada and there were signs everywhere thanking Canada. I remember it clearly. I guess it wasn't enough.



So maybe Canadians shouldn't stick their necks out for Americans again?

The fact of the matter is that Canadians will probably always help Americans. It's one of the things that makes you folks our kith and kin.

Fine.

Be that guy!