Really? CB just did. That's why I don't think he is conservative in his thinking. Most Conservatives aren't and it shows whenever and wherever they form a government.
lol, the other guy that thinks I'm a Conservative chimes in.
It's funny how the only to people certain I'm a Conservative are the two guys whose ego I bruise regularly, lol.
Supporting the military is inherently left wing because it's authoritarian and therefore no small-c (or true) conservative should support it, but the big-c Conservative brand is just whatever the party says is on its platform and so in that respect, most people on this site (including CDN) support that platform and whatever feeble anti-ISIS mission that would entail.
No I just think Ralph was stupid for putting all focus on balancing the budget.
It's clear that his agenda only reinforced Alberta's economic development primarily in one industry.
No I just think Ralph was stupid for putting all focus on balancing the budget.
She's the leader of one of the most influential provinces in one of the wealthiest countries on the planet. If she's a "failure", what does that make you?
ETA
Never mind. I forgot. You're disadvantaged
It was a difficult question and probably a bit embarrassing. Seriously though, if you consider her a failure with her achievements, what is your opinion when you look in the mirror?
See post #63. Apparently, CB thinks achieving the office of Premier of Alberta is not the least bit impressive. Do you agree?
Ya ya ya ya...we know. It's difficult for you to look in the mirror.
Yes, but something not easily achieved by a failure
I don't disagree. Look, I think Albertans are going to pay dearly for electing the Dipper government. If you want to say that the Dipper policies are a failure, that's one thing but to say Rachel is a failure, that's laughable. Clearly my question embarrassed CB. Otherwise he would just list his accomplishments that put Rachel to shame
So then we agree that winning an election is a personal achievement. I guess where we disagree is that you think the word "achievement" means "failure". That probably stems from your lack of education, being disadvantage and all
I think there is enough people here that understand you have a difficult time expressing yourself in a clear and concise manner. Perhaps you should take that into account and think before you post. I can accept that you didn't really mean that Rachel was a failure. I've read enough of your posts to see your limitations and you have admitted yourself that your disadvantaged so let's just agree you made a mistake. Far from being a failure, Rachel has accomplished a hell of a lot more than you have but it's yet to be determined whether you're a failure
Your failure is noted
This just in, CB says Rachel is a rousing success.… You just have to understand the context
Trudeau would be proud, depending on the context of course.
You're so silly. I've never said you're conservative. You're a Conservative, of that there is no doubt. I fully realize you don't understand the difference but that's OK. I just chalk it up to your disadvantaged position. Someday we need may be able to help you
In what context?
You clearly don't understand the context behind O'leary's statements
Don't be silly. CB supports and has supported the Conservatives. He's so blinded by party politics he thinks Notley is a failure.
Not if you're CB or the Capt...but I'm not sure of the context of their statements. From my perspective, she wanted to get elected and she did. She is, therefore, successful. Maybe that's all she really cares about.
It's good that he's doing a good job considering he didn't want the job
ETA
I guess if he didn't want the job but ended up getting it, he failed in his goal....just like Rachel
Bwaaahahaha!He's made it about me. I'm clearly in his head.
You believe in running up debt?
If that reply is to me you may not be aware of this but I am 100% in favour of pipelines ......
Salty Guy Circling as key Conservatives test Tory leadership waters
"I thought at some point, someone is going to say to me, if you can be such a critic, why don't you do better? Why don't you try it?" O'Leary told CBC News. "I thought to myself, hmmm, maybe I should."
Not surprisingly, O'Leary said his main motivation for considering a leadership run is the economy.
"Every word that comes out of a politician's mouth, including mine, should I elect to go for this, is how does it create the next incremental job," he said. "That's what I care about."
The businessman admits he's a polarizing figure, but argues he's just telling the truth. If that sounds like someone running for the top job south of the border, it should. O'Leary freely acknowledges he is inspired by the campaign success of Donald Trump.
"I know Trump. I know his family. I've watched him work. I think he's smart as a fox," he said, adding that Trump's approach to politics taps into a growing fatigue with politicians in general coupled with a desire for better management.
more......
Kevin O'Leary circling as key Conservatives test Tory leadership waters - Politics - CBC News
![]()
Well he did insult one of their prophet's. So you know he'll be viewed as a heretic and pilloried for his heresy. Thankfully we don't allow burning at the stake any more.Typical slobbering Liberal trying to Label someone ...
As a "Canadian Trump" at least he is successful in business and probably has 100 X the money the idiots on this forum have..
No I just think Ralph was stupid for putting all focus on balancing the budget.
It's clear that his agenda only reinforced Alberta's economic development primarily in one industry.
Well he did insult one of their prophet's. So you know he'll be viewed as a heretic and pilloried for his heresy. Thankfully we don't allow burning at the stake any more.
Holy crap!! I knew I was in your head but this is getting ridiculous.
Not as good as the time he gave me almost 50 neg reps in a row.
That was legendary salt.
Oh oh, Flossy's so salty he's breaking out the lies again, lol.