Mark Carney (Trudeau Liberal Replacement) as PM

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
Do we care about what day various cults talk to sky pilots? Or anything else. April 28 is my son's birthday. Should we have postponed the election a day because of this? It really doesn't matter to the rest of us.
The only exception to that would be IF election day was the same as a major HOCKEY Game !!!;-)
There are some things we just don't mess with ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,066
10,480
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Liberals want to change the way those deficits are calculated, by splicing out government operational spending from capital spending. The platform defines capital spending as “anything that builds an asset” owned by the federal government, another level of government, or a private company. It includes spending on machinery, equipment, land and buildings, and government incentives for private investment, the platform says.

Earlier this year, Carney vowed to balance the government operating budget in three years, while using capital spending to spur the economy.

Under the plan, a Carney government would continue running budget deficits of $62.34 billion in the current fiscal year, declining to $47.8 billion in 2028-29.

A Carney government would cap — not cut — the size of the public service, and ensure program expenses grow less than 2 per cent each year, compared with almost 9-per-cent annually since 2015??? By changing the way those expenses are calculated, right?

Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, or three times, and then ask for a fourth try ‘cuz it’ll be different this time with almost all the same players? Thank you but no.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,066
10,480
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The plans Carney released Saturday, would see the federal government dramatically increase spending and add a further $130 billion in deficit spending over four years.

Instead of a $42 billion deficit this current fiscal year, the Carney plan would see a $62 billion deficit. Next year’s projected $31 billion deficit would be $60 billion. The $30 billion projected for the following year would be $55 billion and the projected $28 billion deficit for fiscal year 2028-29 would be $48 billion.

Of course, that’s only if the Liberals make their targets, which they haven’t done in years, like 10 of them in the last three consecutive terms. They always have much higher deficits than even their own projections call for.
1745157519367.jpeg
The fact is, the government only hits these numbers through vague calls for finding efficiencies, read spending cuts, hiking the fines and penalties levied by the Canada Revenue Agency on tax filers and by going after industry. Four times Carney’s plan calls for “big polluter” or “big emitters” to pay more.
His favourite example of a “big polluter” has been steel mills, one of the very industries he says we need to protect from Trump’s tariffs making companies uncompetitive. Meanwhile, Carney’s plan is to increase the industrial carbon tax on Canadian companies, which will hurt industry and cost Canadian jobs.
Carney is promising a balanced budget by the end of his government’s first term in office, the same as Trudeau promised in the 2015 election that brought him to power. Flash forward to today — with the Trudeau Liberals never having produced a balanced budget in their decade in power and having blown their own deficit target of $40.1 billion for the 2023-24 fiscal year by 54% — coming in at $61.9 billion.

According to the Liberal platform released Saturday, Carney is promising to balance the budget after three years, but not in the way deficits are traditionally calculated??? The Carney Liberals say their platform is “fully costed,” but that’s what the Trudeau Liberals said in 2015, before blowing their deficits sky high.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taxslave2

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,339
7,966
113
B.C.
The plans Carney released Saturday, would see the federal government dramatically increase spending and add a further $130 billion in deficit spending over four years.

Instead of a $42 billion deficit this current fiscal year, the Carney plan would see a $62 billion deficit. Next year’s projected $31 billion deficit would be $60 billion. The $30 billion projected for the following year would be $55 billion and the projected $28 billion deficit for fiscal year 2028-29 would be $48 billion.

Of course, that’s only if the Liberals make their targets, which they haven’t done in years, like 10 of them in the last three consecutive terms. They always have much higher deficits than even their own projections call for.
View attachment 28818
The fact is, the government only hits these numbers through vague calls for finding efficiencies, read spending cuts, hiking the fines and penalties levied by the Canada Revenue Agency on tax filers and by going after industry. Four times Carney’s plan calls for “big polluter” or “big emitters” to pay more.
His favourite example of a “big polluter” has been steel mills, one of the very industries he says we need to protect from Trump’s tariffs making companies uncompetitive. Meanwhile, Carney’s plan is to increase the industrial carbon tax on Canadian companies, which will hurt industry and cost Canadian jobs.
Carney is promising a balanced budget by the end of his government’s first term in office, the same as Trudeau promised in the 2015 election that brought him to power. Flash forward to today — with the Trudeau Liberals never having produced a balanced budget in their decade in power and having blown their own deficit target of $40.1 billion for the 2023-24 fiscal year by 54% — coming in at $61.9 billion.

According to the Liberal platform released Saturday, Carney is promising to balance the budget after three years, but not in the way deficits are traditionally calculated??? The Carney Liberals say their platform is “fully costed,” but that’s what the Trudeau Liberals said in 2015, before blowing their deficits sky high.
But come now Carney is a world renowned central banker , surely he will be different than the one he was advising .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,066
10,480
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
NEPEAN, ONT. – Diana Fox Carney introduced her husband beneath blue skies at a large outdoor rally in his chosen Ottawa-area riding of Nepean on Sunday.

“Mark is unflappable because he puts in the prep work that is necessary,” she said.

Liberals had best hope so because, as the election campaign enters its final week, the assault from the Conservatives on the tens of billions of dollars of new spending in the party’s platform has already started.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said on Sunday that he has long argued that Carney is the same as former prime minister Justin Trudeau. “(But) yesterday we learned that Mark Carney is far more costly than Justin Trudeau,” he said, pointing out the platform will add nearly a quarter-trillion dollars of extra debt.
Over the past four years, the Trudeau government racked up cumulative deficits of $235 billion (2024–25’s is an estimated $48.3 billion). Over the next four years, the Carney Liberals are projecting deficits of $225 billion.

On April Fools Day, while most of us were focused on the real challenges in our lives — rising food prices, high rent, increasing debt, broken health care — the Trudeau-appointed Governor General quietly approved $40.3 billion in new federal spending. This was done under what’s called a “special warrant.” Sounds official, but here’s what it really means: Billions of your dollars spent without debate, without a vote, without a single question in Parliament.

There was no due process. No committee oversight. No media scrutiny. Just signatures behind closed doors. The spending was authorized while Parliament remained suspended — prorogued by a government that didn’t want to face tough questions about its ongoing Green Slush Fund scandal.

So, where’s all that money going? Let’s start with the biggest red flag — $150 million to the CBC. While families cut back on basic groceries and small businesses are laying off staff, the federal government decides that the most “urgent” priority is a $150 million cash injection to a media outlet that already receives over a billion a year in public funding.

Just days ago, a CBC reporter — paid by you — stood in the White House press gallery and asked a question so absurd it barely deserves repeating: Whether Donald Trump still wants Canada to become the 51st state. That’s not journalism. That’s a political plant. It came just as Mark Carney’s polling numbers were slipping, and the anti-Trump narrative was losing steam. Suddenly, the CBC steps in to revive the fear campaign? Coincidence? Don’t kid yourself.
We need answers. Who is that reporter? Do they hold a Liberal Party membership? Have they volunteered for or donated to the party? Are they part of Carney’s backchannel communications strategy? If a private media outlet had done this for a Conservative leader, there would already be calls for a public inquiry.

The Treasury Board Secretariat — the same department approving all this spending — gets $1.1 billion of the total. Yes, the people cutting the cheques are writing one to themselves.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation? Another $778 million. This is the same agency that keeps promising affordable housing while prices climb and new builds stall. Where is this money really going?

VIA Rail was given $166 million, even though ridership remains a fraction of pre-pandemic levels and the service loses money year after year. Why now? What’s the emergency?

Parks Canada gets $143 million. Statistics Canada, another $145 million. Telefilm Canada? $75 million. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council? $246 million.

Even the Canadian Museum of History — which charges admission and has substantial private donations — was handed almost $10 million.

Then there’s the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, which received $1.5 million despite reporting $28 million in investments and over $1.2 million in passive income last year.

This isn’t emergency spending. It’s political spending. It’s a desperate government shovelling money to departments, agencies, and institutions that will protect its legacy and promote its talking points during an election campaign.

All of this was done while Parliament was suspended — on purpose — to avoid scrutiny.

The Liberals have learned that when you shut down the debate, you can do whatever you want. No questions. No opposition. Just unchecked power.

None of this makes your life better. Not one line item in that $40.3 billion package will reduce your tax burden, shorten your wait time in the ER, or make your street safer. The money vanishes into a bloated machine that serves itself.