Insite Given Exemption By SCoC

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
May as well be legalized since the vast majority of addicted get from an Rx as it is.

Nah, that would just "cheapen" the many drugs that are instrumental in improving health and saving lives as opposed to those that are detrimental.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,165
14,240
113
Low Earth Orbit
That doesn't make them any less of an addiction issue than those you already fund heavily. What do you think get shot up more? "Mo" or heroin?
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Interesting, crack and meth are now "medical care".

If you think that the SCoC will overturn based on your speculative assumption - I'd say that you are spending far too much time at Insite.
Have you been to East Vancouver? No amount of police-beat work will be slowing down the use of drugs in that area. Providing clean needles to those who would otherwise use secondhand alley needles is a way to help slow the spread of HIV.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Have you been to East Vancouver? No amount of police-beat work will be slowing down the use of drugs in that area. Providing clean needles to those who would otherwise use secondhand alley needles is a way to help slow the spread of HIV.


I lived out on the left coast for a few years and visited the Hastings area on a number of occasions. Grim and soulless might begin to describe my thoughts.

As far as needle exchanges are concerned, that is a strong program that is present in numerous cities throughout Canada... An excellent program that keeps the dirty units off the streets and playgrounds and (obviously) offers clean/sterile rigs, but you don't need Insite to do that. That said, if Insite played an aggressive role in the provision of rehab services, I could see the merits in it's existence, but as it stands, I see them as enablers.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
That said, if Insite played an aggressive role in the provision of rehab services, I could see the merits in it's existence, but as it stands, I see them as enablers.

They are sending people to detox amongst other rehab services, the clinic is called Onsite, and it's located directly above Insite in the very same building...
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
They are sending people to detox amongst other rehab services, the clinic is called Onsite, and it's located directly above Insite in the very same building...


According to the clinic's own statistics, Insite serviced 12,236 individuals 2010 and made 458 admissions to OnSite detox... That's a very sad success rate (0.0374%) for actually getting people off of the drug use.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,395
1,367
113
60
Alberta
I am going to be candid here because I have a son who has battled addiction. Drug addicts will use you at every turn to feed their addiction,. that will include, lying to you, stealing from you and telling you anything you want to hear. My experience with Detox and Rehab was that while there can be limited success, most people that go there use it as a way to avoid the consequences of their addiction. ie: to escape criminal charges or to get away from circumstances usually brought on by their addictive behavior.

In my son's case what he did was hook up with other drug users and begin formulating plans to deceive us and find new and inventive ways to use more drugs. This was the result of brainstorming with other drug users in rehab. When he came out of rehab he was even more deceitful and dishonest than when he went in.

What eventually led him to sobriety was finding people who were clean to help him get straightened out. From his perspective and by extension mine: Enabling is a drug users wet dream, the easier you make it on them, the less work they have to do to feed the addiction and the longer they can avoid the inevitable crash that is coming.

I find it rather pathetic that we will go to great lengths to help people do drugs, but are terrified at the notion to exercise some tough love to help save their lives. The Insite program is nothing less than a facility for drug addicts to shoot their heroin. While some might argue that these people are being helped, I would argue that we are simply feeding the crocodile for fear of being eaten.

When the drug users leave Insite, many (if not most) are still committing crimes to feed their addiction and those who endorse this nonsense are aiding in the commission of those crimes by enabling the addicts, rather than helping them. .
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Todays article on Insite

The problem with Insite is people take their personal ideology into an area that many are not conversant in.
Myself i trust the science.
While Insite does go against the grain - What has been noted is there is not 1, 2 or 3 ways to get addicts of the drugs.

It also lowered deaths. The Lancet for one confirmed this.

The ones (organization)against Insite use false information, studies and ideology that have a pre ordained decision, so that makes it BS in my mind.

Julio Montaner: The science is in, Insite saves lives | Full Comment | National Post

Drug addiction remains a major public-health problem. Unfortunately, policymakers have been slow to support public-health interventions that have proven effective in clinical studies. Many of these interventions are recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and include a range of harm-reduction interventions that remain controversial in Canada.

One explanation for the slow acceptance of evidence-based interventions is the aggressive work of lobby groups that prefer the status quo. The over-reliance on drug law enforcement strategies under the “war on drugs” has been conclusively proven to be a costly failure. Law enforcement lobby groups seeking to “make the world drug-free” have sought to undermine the recommendations of leading scientific bodies, such as the WHO. These groups include Drug Free America, Drug Free Australia and the Drug Prevention Network of Canada.

One group that has opposed Insite is REAL Women of Canada. REAL Women of Canada and the Drug Prevention Network of Canada commissioned Drug Free Australia to produce a report that called into question a study published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, which reported a 35% reduction in overdose deaths in a geographical area around Insite.

Drug Free Australia’s critique has never been peer-reviewed or published in a scientific journal. It contains too many methodological and factual errors to list here. Most stem from a failure to appropriately consider the geographic location and causes of deaths. In fact, the critique simply lists the crude number of drug-related deaths, including suicides and alcohol poisonings, per year in a 400-block area. This was without any effort to consider how the population at risk changed over time.

In contrast, the authors of The Lancet study worked with the B.C. Coroner’s Office to accurately determine the location and cause of each death, and used census data to calculate changes in death rates in a 40-block area around Insite — where most Insite users reside. This approach, which is consistent with standard scientific practice and was peer-reviewed by experts in the field, demonstrated a 35% reduction in overdoses in the area around Insite.

This campaign was dismissed entirely by the Australian Medical Association. Likewise, one of the authors of the Drug Free Australia report, Colin Mangham, produced an earlier critique of Insite. However, after it was revealed that the RCMP funded the report, the RCMP itself admitted that the report “did not meet conventional academic standards.”
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
unfortunately an addict has to hit bottom before starting a recovery process.They didnt take long in Calgary to shut down the free crack pipe program once the public found out about it.They should just legalize all drugs,make things simpler for the cops and cut down on crime in a huge way.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
unfortunately an addict has to hit bottom before starting a recovery process.They didnt take long in Calgary to shut down the free crack pipe program once the public found out about it.They should just legalize all drugs,make things simpler for the cops and cut down on crime in a huge way.

That is not a solution.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,395
1,367
113
60
Alberta
unfortunately an addict has to hit bottom before starting a recovery process.They didnt take long in Calgary to shut down the free crack pipe program once the public found out about it.They should just legalize all drugs,make things simpler for the cops and cut down on crime in a huge way.

How will the drug users pay for those legal drugs?
 

itsmesean

New Member
Oct 7, 2011
40
0
6
vancouver
Forgive me, but the people going to Insite are not "banging junk without consequence" that sh@t is distroying them and they need to get off it. Do you want to pay to put them through the court / prison system? I don't and it will just not stop people from being addicts. If we as a country really want to clean up the drug problem, we need to spend a lot of money on rehab clinics as well as prevention ( our education system would be a start) When people say things like "It's Insite that's perpetuating the status quo" it makes me wonder?... Insite has not been there all along people, and what the hell are you doing to help or change the status quo?