May as well be legalized since the vast majority of addicted get from an Rx as it is.
Nah, that would just "cheapen" the many drugs that are instrumental in improving health and saving lives as opposed to those that are detrimental.
May as well be legalized since the vast majority of addicted get from an Rx as it is.
May as well be legalized since the vast majority of addicted get from an Rx as it is.
Mo aka Morphine paid for by the people through an Rx and sold on the street beats imported hands down.Couldn't tell ya
Have you been to East Vancouver? No amount of police-beat work will be slowing down the use of drugs in that area. Providing clean needles to those who would otherwise use secondhand alley needles is a way to help slow the spread of HIV.Interesting, crack and meth are now "medical care".
If you think that the SCoC will overturn based on your speculative assumption - I'd say that you are spending far too much time at Insite.
Have you been to East Vancouver? No amount of police-beat work will be slowing down the use of drugs in that area. Providing clean needles to those who would otherwise use secondhand alley needles is a way to help slow the spread of HIV.
That said, if Insite played an aggressive role in the provision of rehab services, I could see the merits in it's existence, but as it stands, I see them as enablers.
They are sending people to detox amongst other rehab services, the clinic is called Onsite, and it's located directly above Insite in the very same building...
Todays article on Insite
The problem with Insite is people take their personal ideology into an area that many are not conversant in.
Myself i trust the science.
While Insite does go against the grain - What has been noted is there is not 1, 2 or 3 ways to get addicts of the drugs.
It also lowered deaths. The Lancet for one confirmed this.
The ones (organization)against Insite use false information, studies and ideology that have a pre ordained decision, so that makes it BS in my mind.
Julio Montaner: The science is in, Insite saves lives | Full Comment | National Post
Drug addiction remains a major public-health problem. Unfortunately, policymakers have been slow to support public-health interventions that have proven effective in clinical studies. Many of these interventions are recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and include a range of harm-reduction interventions that remain controversial in Canada.
One explanation for the slow acceptance of evidence-based interventions is the aggressive work of lobby groups that prefer the status quo. The over-reliance on drug law enforcement strategies under the “war on drugs” has been conclusively proven to be a costly failure. Law enforcement lobby groups seeking to “make the world drug-free” have sought to undermine the recommendations of leading scientific bodies, such as the WHO. These groups include Drug Free America, Drug Free Australia and the Drug Prevention Network of Canada.
One group that has opposed Insite is REAL Women of Canada. REAL Women of Canada and the Drug Prevention Network of Canada commissioned Drug Free Australia to produce a report that called into question a study published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, which reported a 35% reduction in overdose deaths in a geographical area around Insite.
Drug Free Australia’s critique has never been peer-reviewed or published in a scientific journal. It contains too many methodological and factual errors to list here. Most stem from a failure to appropriately consider the geographic location and causes of deaths. In fact, the critique simply lists the crude number of drug-related deaths, including suicides and alcohol poisonings, per year in a 400-block area. This was without any effort to consider how the population at risk changed over time.
In contrast, the authors of The Lancet study worked with the B.C. Coroner’s Office to accurately determine the location and cause of each death, and used census data to calculate changes in death rates in a 40-block area around Insite — where most Insite users reside. This approach, which is consistent with standard scientific practice and was peer-reviewed by experts in the field, demonstrated a 35% reduction in overdoses in the area around Insite.
This campaign was dismissed entirely by the Australian Medical Association. Likewise, one of the authors of the Drug Free Australia report, Colin Mangham, produced an earlier critique of Insite. However, after it was revealed that the RCMP funded the report, the RCMP itself admitted that the report “did not meet conventional academic standards.”
unfortunately an addict has to hit bottom before starting a recovery process.They didnt take long in Calgary to shut down the free crack pipe program once the public found out about it.They should just legalize all drugs,make things simpler for the cops and cut down on crime in a huge way.
unfortunately an addict has to hit bottom before starting a recovery process.They didnt take long in Calgary to shut down the free crack pipe program once the public found out about it.They should just legalize all drugs,make things simpler for the cops and cut down on crime in a huge way.
If they're on the streets, probably drug benefits....How will the drug users pay for those legal drugs?
If they're on the streets, probably drug benefits....