Chavez was involved in a democratic revolution. as such yes there are bound to
be some human rights violations as we would know them I don't disagree with
that. Put in context he had little choice, in such a change. The fact is he was an
elected President more than once therefore try as one might he could not be labelled
a dictator. Hugo was pushing the country left and had a coalition with others in the
region that is also true.
His revolution was a lot better than a one filled with bloodshed in the streets.
After Hugo what happens? If the poor come out to vote the revolution will continue
and there will be constant friction. I am more concerned with a division that is not
so civil and there is nothing civil about a civil war which is possible.
I both liked and disliked some of his actions. Clamping down on military people who
were opposed to him is fair game, the country has a long history of right and left
intrigue and he was not going to stand for it. Some cry foul and they are likely right.
It is also known that there was a long spell of real right wing nasty people who ran the
place for a while and it was time for a change.
It all comes down to the idea that we are better off without this kind of government no
matter on who's side of the fence we're on.
Over all he did more good than harm in my opinion. Those who claim he was a Saint
can't agree there.
be some human rights violations as we would know them I don't disagree with
that. Put in context he had little choice, in such a change. The fact is he was an
elected President more than once therefore try as one might he could not be labelled
a dictator. Hugo was pushing the country left and had a coalition with others in the
region that is also true.
His revolution was a lot better than a one filled with bloodshed in the streets.
After Hugo what happens? If the poor come out to vote the revolution will continue
and there will be constant friction. I am more concerned with a division that is not
so civil and there is nothing civil about a civil war which is possible.
I both liked and disliked some of his actions. Clamping down on military people who
were opposed to him is fair game, the country has a long history of right and left
intrigue and he was not going to stand for it. Some cry foul and they are likely right.
It is also known that there was a long spell of real right wing nasty people who ran the
place for a while and it was time for a change.
It all comes down to the idea that we are better off without this kind of government no
matter on who's side of the fence we're on.
Over all he did more good than harm in my opinion. Those who claim he was a Saint
can't agree there.