I would guess that after four years of Trump maybe 60 executive orders might be necessary.Ya, writing 60+ Executive Orders can be exhausting, that's for sure!
I would guess that after four years of Trump maybe 60 executive orders might be necessary.Ya, writing 60+ Executive Orders can be exhausting, that's for sure!
Yeppers, apparently I'm REALLY hateful!1 NOT - don't "hate" anyone but sure do hate stupid ideas & ideologies that don't make any sense at all. I also hate "mustard" and the way things are going, that proves that I'm a racist of some sort too and should be cancelled, hated and destroyed. Seriously - that's what the world is coming to.Many big-money actors are working on pay equity.
But I understand you don't know and don't care, you just want to spew hate at a group you perceive to be "liberal."
Trump didn't actually do anything radical & the Democrats are so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Enlighten???I would guess that after four years of Trump maybe 60 executive orders might be necessary.
He really doesn’t know , he thinks Trump told people to drink Clorox .Trump didn't actually do anything radical & the Democrats are so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Enlighten???
"Actually" might be rather debatable! He's a blowhard and did set a combative tone as we witnessed when renegotiating Nafta AND when he predicted months before the election that it was going to be "rigged". Instilling destructive ideas into peoples' heads might be construed as radical. Instilling destructive ideas resulting in mayhem at the Capitol, is definitely radical. J.M.H.O. (along with a few million others)Trump didn't actually do anything radical & the Democrats are so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Enlighten???
Was he wrong?"Actually" might be rather debatable! He's a blowhard and did set a combative tone as we witnessed when renegotiating Nafta AND when he predicted months before the election that it was going to be "rigged". Instilling destructive ideas into peoples' heads might be construed as radical. Instilling destructive ideas resulting in mayhem at the Capitol, is definitely radical. J.M.H.O. (along with a few million others)
Prove it, we supplied proof to the contraryYeah!
That's what happens when you send a "journalist" to negotiate - she didn't have a clue and was "out negotiated". Our loss is America's gain. Sending someone that's ideologically bent without any negotiating experience was one of the most stupid thing that Trudeau ever did.Freeland fucked up and didnt consider American companies would land cheaper Asian defective aluminum and steel products at Canadian Ports where dollar exchange beat the Canadian tariff.
What crap negotiating if you dont consider dollar values when setting mutual tariffs against the same export sources.
The legitimate Canadian imports and exporters lost heavily.
Amateurs
Ya, JLM, I agree, he is a "blow hard" but he did get things done. I prefer to accept individuals whose "actions" speak louder than "words". I have stated previously that while I don't care for him personally & didn't like some of the tweets he made, he did what he said he was going to do and that's what is important. He improved the lives of many. Biden is doing the exact opposite while using "nice" words. Big bloody deal."Actually" might be rather debatable! He's a blowhard and did set a combative tone as we witnessed when renegotiating Nafta AND when he predicted months before the election that it was going to be "rigged". Instilling destructive ideas into peoples' heads might be construed as radical. Instilling destructive ideas resulting in mayhem at the Capitol, is definitely radical. J.M.H.O. (along with a few million others)
Worst decision for the West was allowing the US fully out of their Oil purchase obligations throwing us at the mercy of their marketers.That's what happens when you send a "journalist" to negotiate - she didn't have a clue and was "out negotiated". Our loss is America's gain. Sending someone that's ideologically bent without any negotiating experience was one of the most stupid thing that Trudeau ever did.
Do you think with Biden he's NOT taking action or is he taking action in ways we don't like? Like on day one "deep sixed" the pipeline? He has gotten right onto Covid 19 and has totally changed the philosophy on climate change and touched base with our illustrious leader. I don't see that as bad for his first month!Ya, JLM, I agree, he is a "blow hard" but he did get things done. I prefer to accept individuals whose "actions" speak louder than "words". I have stated previously that while I don't care for him personally & didn't like some of the tweets he made, he did what he said he was going to do and that's what is important. He improved the lives of many. Biden is doing the exact opposite while using "nice" words. Big bloody deal.
What's there to prove? Anyone who has followed the news heard his bull shit on the "rigged election" and has witnessed the mayhem at the parliament. Anyone who didn't pick up on that either wasn't paying attention or is stupid.Prove it, we supplied proof to the contrary
Do you have proof to refute that there was election fraud ? Biden in the White house is not proofWhat's there to prove? Anyone who has followed the news heard his bull shit on the "rigged election" and has witnessed the mayhem at the parliament. Anyone who didn't pick up on that either wasn't paying attention or is stupid.
Full Blown T D SDo you have proof to refute that there was election fraud ? Biden in the White house is not proof
Returning to election rules of the past is proof of something fishy
France changing their election rules because of the US election is proof
Michigan removing 177,000 voter from their roll post election is proof
Pennsylvania with 200,000+ over votes is proof
Capturing Chinese communication with voting machines in real time is proof of foreign interference
Do I need to go on?
What do you have JLM?
No one but a fool would say there was no election frauas I'm pretty sure a counterfeit ballot probably got snuck in here and there, but anyone who thinks enough fraud happened to throw the election just ain't playing with a "full deck" and I have some cheap beach property complete with a bridge for sale. What do you think the scrutineers were doing through the whole process?Do you have proof to refute that there was election fraud ? Biden in the White house is not proof
Returning to election rules of the past is proof of something fishy
France changing their election rules because of the US election is proof
Michigan removing 177,000 voter from their roll post election is proof
Pennsylvania with 200,000+ over votes is proof
Capturing Chinese communication with voting machines in real time is proof of foreign interference
Do I need to go on?
What do you have JLM?
Can't fix stupid, JLM.No one but a fool would say there was no election frauas I'm pretty sure a counterfeit ballot probably got snuck in here and there, but anyone who thinks enough fraud happened to throw the election just ain't playing with a "full deck" and I have some cheap beach property complete with a bridge for sale. What do you think the scrutineers were doing through the whole process?