It makes sense though. Solutions to their issues (if they find one) and pockets that jingle. Win/win.What?... And actually contribute to a solution? Not a chance in hell on that account
It makes sense though. Solutions to their issues (if they find one) and pockets that jingle. Win/win.What?... And actually contribute to a solution? Not a chance in hell on that account
Which list? There are a couple.You'd think so, wouldn't you?
Then again, if they solve the problem, then that issue is off the protest-table. It almost makes you wonder if their is an ulterior motive by the higher-ups in the various eco-groups.
Say, didn't you post a link to the various contributors to the eco-lobbies some time ago? If I recall correctly, there seemed to be a real preponderance of Foundations and Trusts that had big financial interests in a variety of commodity-based sectors.
Makes ya wonder just a bit, eh?
Which list? There are a couple.
I have an idea. Lets start our own foundation, buy oodles of land then profit from a carbon credit scheme as that land sits useless and blocked from public access.
I like it!
We can call it the Flossy Foundation, maybe an illustration of a cute lamb happily grazing in a field for the letterhead... Little will the public know that the lamb is slated to be fleeced over and over again
In many cases, the protestors do not question the underlying realities about the issues, they simply are given the 'correct thoughts' from whatever lobby they represent... And, much like a rabid dog, they adopt the most narrow of focuses and and march into a realm of idiocy
They call that spot the Black Hole. After the 'save the planet concert' that Midnight Oil put on, the ecotards turned that part of Calyquot into a moonscape.
What?... And actually contribute to a solution?
Not a chance in hell on that account
Yep. It might surprise you, but I'm a tree hugger. I just know I live in the real world.
So why isn't the "environmental movement" investing in R&D to offer up and sell solutions?
Correction, they just squawk because their Der Leader says they should.Some just squawk for the sake of squawking.
Excellent question.So why isn't the "environmental movement" investing in R&D to offer up and sell solutions?
When you're done fantasizing about licking Captains face, maybe you could answer petros' question.Such bitter tears!
When you're done fantasizing about licking Captains face, maybe you could answer petros' question.
Don't forget the whole rubbing off on me affair. Then there was the unrequited love gif's.Ewwwww. First it was naughty dreams about Harper, now it's poor Captain.
Don't forget the whole rubbing off on me affair.
Then there was the unrequited love gif's.
Seems to be a pattern.
Yep, all environmentalists are lazy and don't offer solutions.........
just like all business people are greedy and pollute.
Well, it was less sarcastic, for sure.I do prefer what you wrote on the differences between Capitalism and Communism.
Well, it was less sarcastic, for sure.
You're welcome. Galbraith was a pretty canny dude, IMO.
Yep, all environmentalists are lazy and don't offer solutions.........
just like all business people are greedy and pollute.
I do prefer what you wrote on the differences between Capitalism and Communism.
lol That sure makes sense.
It can seem to be that way. Depends upon who is elected into each voting area.
1 day per year? That doesn't happen often.
Many people voting someone in or out is a bit more than pretending.