Re: US considers setting fire to Gulf of Mexico oil leak
Why not plant some bombs in some shallow holes (yes holes) around the main shaft even before drilling starts and then if the BOP and such fail the bombs could be remoted and that would 'collapse the pipe' at a dept of 100 ft or so. Ruins the hole but no spill. The bombs could be moved with the rig or left in place if fracking is planned for more zones.
This is their 'fire-drill', see what doesn't work and then do what should have been done in the beginning. (they will get to the hay once they can drive the price of it up enough so the middle-men make the most money. (then it becomes a black-market item) At least they have a new garbage-pit in the making, saves them barging it out to deeper water. They should save their offshore drilling for the colder climates, colder air should make the cleanup (burning in place) easier as it should be thicker just by being colder. Perhaps the shrimp farmers would be interested in some property on the shores of the Hudson Bay. Shrimping in the summer and hauling ice down south in the winter. Make all of James Bay one big Bourbon Street 24/7/365 and watch the French go after the French immigrants.Too bad there wasn't one central authority and regulatory body to handle environmental matters just like this leak. I can't help but think that a central global governing body of some sort could have prevented this leak, possibly through taxation.
Why not plant some bombs in some shallow holes (yes holes) around the main shaft even before drilling starts and then if the BOP and such fail the bombs could be remoted and that would 'collapse the pipe' at a dept of 100 ft or so. Ruins the hole but no spill. The bombs could be moved with the rig or left in place if fracking is planned for more zones.