LOLView attachment 13137
1% for a Cartoon Elephant? What is that symbolic of?
Why not....Trudeau doesThe party of law and order lol
“You can’t be a leader of a party and the chief legislator of the country, as prime minister, and support people breaking the laws. That disqualifies you.”
You also can’t continuously break Canadian laws in parliamentary ethics code and expect to be re-elected repeatedly but here we are?The party of law and order lol
…..“Laws are not a buffet table, if you’re a legislator, from which you choose what you want. Because what you’re really saying to people is I’m above the law,” Charest added in a separate interview with CTV News.
“You can’t be a leader of a party and the chief legislator of the country, as prime minister, and support people breaking the laws. That disqualifies you.”
These are an example of our current law and order government. Where are we at on those fronts anyway, & why?Chinese labs? Huawei?
Is this the stuff Conservatives need to lean on now?
Railway blockades that Trudeau supported through his inaction (as the Prime Minister of Canada, and not as a member of the opposition), where does that fit in your condemnation? Does that get a hypocritical pass or do you also have an issue with that?You're comparing apples and oranges.
These are matters that are currently under judicial consideration.
The trucker convoy was a blatantly illegal act that Peepee supported.
I agree with you there. Campaigning in a room full of conservatives and campaigning on a mixed federal front would need two completely different strategies. If he does win the party leadership I'm interested in what his federal shtick would sound like. The last two elections have shown that winning the popular vote isn't near enough, he'll have to make some inroads into tradtionally liberal territory, like the seat-rich urban areas. This was O'Toole's downfall, he did okay playing the hardliner for the leadership campaign, but when he softened his delivery to attract centrists from the liberal side of the fence it pissed off a lot of the hardliners within the party who felt betrayed. When O'Toole started flip-flopping to keep them happy he looked weak in front of the swing vote. Poilievre faces a similar dilemma, play the populist libertarian or the milf-mannered centrist.As for Poilivere, I'll believe what leader he is if he's in and hear what his ideas are officially for the party as a whole when NOT trying to get top dog slot for a party.
A bite out of the Liberals, a slice the le Bloc and a bowl of Dipper sauce makes a full meal deal.I agree with you there. Campaigning in a room full of conservatives and campaigning on a mixed federal front would need two completely different strategies. If he does win the party leadership I'm interested in what his federal shtick would sound like. The last two elections have shown that winning the popular vote isn't near enough, he'll have to make some inroads into tradtionally liberal territory, like the seat-rich urban areas. This was O'Toole's downfall, he did okay playing the hardliner for the leadership campaign, but when he softened his delivery to attract centrists from the liberal side of the fence it pissed off a lot of the hardliners within the party who felt betrayed. When O'Toole started flip-flopping to keep them happy he looked weak in front of the swing vote. Poilievre faces a similar dilemma, play the populist libertarian or the milf-mannered centrist.
Apparently, he's not aware that there were no laws broken until they were created by government. It is not against the law to peacefully protest so he needs to get his crap together - he's telling lies, just like the Liberals do.The party of law and order lol
Charest blasts Poilievre for supporting Freedom Convoy: 'Laws are not a buffet'
“Laws are not a buffet table, if you’re a legislator, from which you choose what you want. Because what you’re really saying to people is I’m above the law,” Charest added in a separate interview with CTV News.
“You can’t be a leader of a party and the chief legislator of the country, as prime minister, and support people breaking the laws. That disqualifies you.”
Charest blasts Poilievre for supporting Freedom Convoy: 'Laws are not a buffet'
Conservative leadership hopeful Jean Charest is turning up the heat against perceived frontrunner Pierre Poilievre, taking him to task for his support of the trucker protests that took over downtown Ottawa and led to blockades at border crossings.beta.ctvnews.ca
But who will drive the taxis?
Yes. I still use Taxi's. Not often. Usually take public transit or drive.You still take a Taxi?? I take Uber.. and there are as many white-born here Canadians and immigrants driving for Uber.
I was watching Colbert & he was talk’n ‘bout the Russian Uber called Tuber. Is Potato!You still take a Taxi?? I take Uber.. and there are as many white-born here Canadians and immigrants driving for Uber.
I keep waiting for "Is Potato" shirts or merch to be sold and profits to go to Ukraine.I was watching Colbert & he was talk’n ‘bout the Russian Uber called Tuber. Is Potato!