Irving Oil , big liberal supporters .So why are we buying from the middle east then ? Makes no sense to me.
Irving Oil , big liberal supporters .So why are we buying from the middle east then ? Makes no sense to me.
I really should modify my vocabulary. As weird as this sounds, at least mentally, I think of the Maritimes as “The Maritimes” and Ontario & Quebec as “Eastern Canada” and thus my usage. I mentally categorize them as two different things. I think of “Western Canada” as MB & SK & AB & BC (with the exception of Vancouver which is its own bizarre planet out on its own tangent).That bolded part right there, I think that is a LOT of the problem.
The Western "We're being shit on cause we're the West" complex and people in the East are as tired of hearing it as I'm sure the West is tired of the East taking advantage of the West.
Whoa, what? Western Ideology social stuff like anti-LGBTQ & being Racist? Really?I honestly wonder if perhaps there are more people who are more we should use more Canadian Oil for Canadian usage than are vocal, but saying so, especially from "the east" you're looked at as a supporter of the West and somehow that equals the whole Western Ideology (social stuff like anti-LGBTQ, 'racist', etc).
…& where does that idea “of the perception of the oil that’d be sent that way (I’m assuming you mean from an area of Canada generally west of you somewhere?), and the social push to ‘be better’ Environmentally” (?) come from?Considering Saudi sends oil to us here in NB to get refined, then back to them, yeah it sucks Higgs' minuscule dick to do that and we SHOULD be using Canadian Oil for Canadian usage, but I don't see that changing and it's not to do with the West, moreso it's to do with perception of the oil that'd be sent this way, and the social push to 'be better' environmentally.
I understand what you’re saying, and by going through the Port of Churchill on the northern route keeps that oil out of the pocket of the US for X amount of pipe mileage, and out of the US political winds like Line5….& please tell me what “people” want? Out this way, we’re still “people,” or at least we consider ourselves to still be “people,” and I hear what they want, as I am a product of that desire and mentality.NO ONE honestly is promoting Canadian oil for Canadian usage.
And they won't.
Because I think it's political suicide if they try it, at least while on campaign. And if we bypass Quebec, that puts us into the pocket of the US for X amount of pipe mileage, which is not something people want either.
Honesty, me too, and it’s a self created problem because we drank the Kool-Aid promoted from the outside (of Canada) that sold the idea that Canadian Oil (and the Canadian “people” involved in its extraction) that our extremely highly regulated industry is somehow worse than the rest of the planet. Hook, line, and economic sinker.Honestly when it comes to oil, I think Canada is fucked.
I really should modify my vocabulary. As weird as this sounds, at least mentally, I think of the Maritimes as “The Maritimes” and Ontario & Quebec as “Eastern Canada” and thus my usage. I mentally categorize them as two different things. I think of “Western Canada” as MB & SK & AB & BC (with the exception of Vancouver which is its own bizarre planet out on its own tangent).
Whoa, what? Western Ideology social stuff like anti-LGBTQ & being Racist? Really?
That’s kind of like saying Eastern Ideology social stuff like living on EI, being blind drunk on Screach, and raping Alter Boys. I don’t believe or endorse this viewpoint, but I’m trying to offer perspective on the above Western Ideology social stuff comment, in a “Where the Fuck is that coming from?” Sort of way…
If I thought you where commenting in jest, I’d laugh along with you ‘cuz stereotypes are kind of funny in pointing back in history to the way “people” use to think in days gone by, but you’re not joking are you?
Just because somebody resides in the same nation as you, but resides in an area generally west of you (or does it start west of Ontario?), it doesn’t mean they’re automatically racists and/or anti-LGBTQ, anymore that all Black guys are hung like farm animals or all Asians can’t parallel park their cars.
…& where does that idea “of the perception of the oil that’d be sent that way (I’m assuming you mean from an area of Canada generally west of you somewhere?), and the social push to ‘be better’ Environmentally” (?) come from?
I understand what you’re saying, and by going through the Port of Churchill on the northern route keeps that oil out of the pocket of the US for X amount of pipe mileage, and out of the US political winds like Line5….& please tell me what “people” want? Out this way, we’re still “people,” or at least we consider ourselves to still be “people,” and I hear what they want, as I am a product of that desire and mentality.
I am honestly promoting Canadian oil for Canadian usage (& not in Papa Trudeau’s twisted vision of it with nationalization).
What movement & demonization made oil from that region of Canada generally to the west of The Maritimes & Eastern Canada political suicide? I am not being facetious and this is an honest question. It had to come from somewhere…
Honesty, me too, and it’s a self created problem because we drank the Kool-Aid promoted from the outside (of Canada) that sold the idea that Canadian Oil (and the Canadian “people” involved in its extraction) that our extremely highly regulated industry is somehow worse than the rest of the planet. Hook, line, and economic sinker.
The racist in the back of this truck.Who won ?
Not bad. The west does not have tar sands though. That is a lie pushed by the oil spitters. California has has sands, and they extract oil from them.I agree on the Vancouver thing.
But every time I hear "The East", yes I know it means Ontario and Quebec, but if I bring up the Maritimes, it's either we're lumped in with them, or totally forgotten about. I think it just gets so annoying in the end that a lot of the time there is nothing 'east' of Ontario or Quebec.
When you said that bolded part, I figured you were half-joking but half-serious. The thing is, there are a lot of others in the West who absolutely believe this, that the rest of Canada is "out to get the West" somehow, and I meant my reply to be a reaction to that ideal. I just didn't explain it as best I could; sorry 'bout that. Considering how many from my area do go out West to work and live, I don't think we're 'out to get' anything there, and I think a lot of people here are truthfully jealous that at least the west gets more attention - or least seems like - because of it's oil and how important it is. Here, we're at best seasonal jobs, we don't have 'steady' and 'big important' like the West does and for me I look at that as a failing of our governments in all our provinces who refuse to look at other ways to bring in big money makers.
Actually I did mean it in the stereotype way but also think that yeah, that stereotype is so much a 'thing' that there are a good chunk of the population who believes the West is anti-GLBT+ and racist. I'm not saying we're not here - cause we are, there are bigots and racists everywhere - but my point was that I think more people would support the West and Pro Canada Oil if they didn't think THEY would be labelled in that same stereotypical way.
No. It doesn't. As I said, people are people and we've racists and bigots here too. That said, there is a misconception that this is "a thing" and a big one, if you do come from the West. And I think that perception hurts. As much as the "If you're from the East you're freeloading Government suckholes and if you're from the Maritimes you are drunk all the time and live off EI.
Though to be fair, there is a bit in truth in that too, thanks to us mostly being seasonal workers...
There's a dominant perception that Alberta oil is bad, worse than 'regular oil' that'd come from Saudi. Tar Sands oil is horrible, and if you're pro-supportive of it, you're anti environmentally friendly. It's one reason, I think, WHY there's such a hate for sending Western oil to us at, say, Saint John where we've the refinery.
Personally, as environmentally conscious as I want to be and try to be, I'd STILL prefer that 'dirty oil' than Saudi, for a lot of reasons.
I hear conflicting things from 'people'. If you're in the West, it's a push to use our own oil for stuff and screw the East (Ontario and Quebec). From others, they hate Western oil and would rather see it stay in the ground.
I think in the Maritimes, it's a conflict because we've had so many go work the oil fields, and some stay there, and there's huge support for the West in that way. But we also have a LOT of 'greenie' types that push the no pipeline agenda.
I think it's such a contentious issue there is no resolving it.
And I'm with you on that.
I think it comes with the idea that Tar Sands oil is fucking horrible and we shouldn't be doing a damned thing with it, leave it in the ground. Whether it's true or not doesn't matter, there's enough divide about it that even those who live in Saint John are split on whether a West-East pipeline should be a thing. And then you have that seasonal worker thing; a lot of our revenue and employment is based on natural resources and there's a fear a pipeline would destroy that. Hell, there's issues still with boats in the Bay because of whales and such.
So in that later respect, politicians in this region have to be careful about the whole 'oil from the west' issue.
I agree with you on that too and I admit I was one of them. But now I just am, at most, divided about it that really it doesn't matter so much, I'd prefer our "dirty" Tar Sands stuff to the crap from Saudi because I cannot stand Saudi Arabia and the choke hold it has on so much.
Who are the 18% going for Charest ? Scary .
"Clean, responsible oil and gas."
Remove the gatekeepers to leave a clear path for throwing the environment under the bus. It's the Conservative way. All on board the Good Ship PeePee.
As Poilievre becomes more popular, I am pretty sure that the leftist liberal Canadian media will be looking for something to attack and mock him on. The Canadian lefty media does not want any conservative like guy to be allowed to run for the leadership of the conservative party. They will say that this guy looks and sounds too conservative, and he must go. The attacks and mocking should happen very soon, if I know my lying Canadian media. Sadly, there are many idiots out there that will believe their bloody leftist lies. When the Canadian media attacks and mocks anyone, then they should know by now that the person that they are attacking has something that they do not want me and you to know about or support. I will always go the reverse to what the lying Canadian says about anything or anyone. Works for me.Poilievre-mania? The surprisingly large crowds flocking to the Tory front-runner
FIRST READING: Poilievre-mania? The surprisingly large crowds flocking to the Tory front-runner
Statue of gay icon pulled down because people say it's racist nownationalpost.com
WOW! Canadians know that Pierre Poilievre is the man to save us from Trudeau.
View attachment 13120Only if Poilievre can get to be the PM before punk Turdeau destroys this once great country called Canada forever and turns it into a Marxist country. After all, dictator Turdeau has three more years to end all freedoms and rights in this country. The dictator may even try and rig the election in his favor next time, again. Hey, we never know, eh?