Due to media hype this case needs to be tossed out since it will be impossible to get an unbiased jury.
Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.
Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.
Does NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.
Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.
Well, prepare yourself, because Rittenhouse is going to be found not guilty on all the serious charges.
I've been watching the trial, and the prosecution has been presenting their case. This should be the high point of the prosecution's attempt to convince the jury..........but things have not gone their way, at all.
Keep in mind there are three things that must be in place before you can use lethal force;
1. The person must have indicated an intent to attack you.
2. The person must have access to a weapon.
3. The person must have the ability to deliver the attack.
We'll take them one at a time.
The prosecution brought forth witnesses and put them on the stand. The first was another, well we'll call them "militiamen" because that is the term they've used in the trial. Anyway, he was with Kyle at the beginning of the night when Rosenbaum approached them and said "If I get you guys alone tonight, I am going to kill you" Check one.
Later in the evening, Rittenhouse extinquished a dumpster fire set by the protesters, which enraged them, and they threatened Rittenhouse to the point he fled the scene, and Rosenbaum prsued him across a parking lot to a spot where Rittenhouse found himself cornered, and turned to face Rosenbaum. According to the testimony of the reporter following the two of them, Rosenbaum was in touching distance of Rittenhouse, screamed "F@ck you" at him and lunged for his rifle. Check two and check three. Remember, this was the prosecution's witness. Rittenhouse is in a struggle over his rifle, and fired 4 quick shots, killing Rosenbaum. Legitimate shooting.
The other two shootings are on film.
They happened within seconds of each other.
Rittenhouse is running towards the police..............he is being pursued by the mob, and trips or is pushed to the ground. Somebody (unknown person) leaps and kicks him in the head, Rittenhouse fires two shots, either as a warning, or he missed. The guy runs off.........and Huber runs in and smashes Rittenhouse in the head with his skateboard (check one, two, and three)..........Rittenhouse fires, killing him.
The third guy (Grosskreutz) is right there. There was a still picture entered as evidence by the defense. Grosskreutz is approaching Rittenhouse with a Glock pistol in his right hand. He is within three feet of him, with his pistol pointed at Rittenhouse (Grosskreutz does NOT have his hands up) when Rittenhouse shoots him. You can see in the picture Grosskreutz's right bicep is a cloud of red. The pic was taken at the very instant Rittenhouse shot him. Check one, two, and three.
Not guilty.
You also said, amongst other postsDoes NOT matter. This 17 year old murderer had no right to shoot this guy, nor was he even legally able to have the weapon he had in his possession.
Defending this little POS pretty much shows the kind of person you are.
You also said, amongst other posts
All the video seems to show otherwise,
but whatever you say. In your mind, he is a murderous little shit no matter what the evidence shows.
And I will quote you....."pretty much shows the kind of person you are"
It would seem you have drawn your own conclusions based upon your own perceptions on what happened that night.Colpy posted as if he thought the prick would be found guilty. Which is not correct, I knew he'd get off.
What I think doesn't exactly matter; he'll get off because the Prosecution cannot prove within the laws of the state that this little shit murdered two people and injured a third.
It would seem you have drawn your own conclusions based upon your own perceptions on what happened that night.
Based so far on what has been shown in court, it does not match your conclusions
And this is the prosecution who is presenting.
We haven't even gotten to the defense yet.
You watching an Alec Baldwin film?Not all, no. The video I saw showed him murdering people.
Looking at yesterdays testimony, he will walk scott free...see post 86He is a murderous little shit from the video I saw. But if he's found not guilty, then that's all that can be said. Maybe the families will sue his ass in civil court.
Wanna show us how many black people he shot?And shows what kind of people they are to defend this racist little shit.
You watching an Alec Baldwin film?
Looking at yesterdays testimony, he will walk scott free...see post 86
Wanna show us how many black people he shot?
Then WHY are you calling him a murderer, when the evidence clearly shows he was not?Prepare myself... for what?
I said in 2020 that he'd get off.
So really nothing to prepare.
Jaded.Then WHY are you calling him a murderer, when the evidence clearly shows he was not?
Which means he is not guilty.Colpy posted as if he thought the prick would be found guilty. Which is not correct, I knew he'd get off.
What I think doesn't exactly matter; he'll get off because the Prosecution cannot prove within the laws of the state that this little shit murdered two people and injured a third.
What, you know what the jury will decide?To be honest, I haven't been paying attention; no need to when the conclusion was decided before the trial.