Humm 2nd Amendment.
Humm - still against WI law for a 17 year old to have that kind of gun, which is, of course, a state right.
I bet you he gets off.. because you are allowed to defend yourself in WI it's called the “Castle Doctrine”
Sadly he will likely get off, but not because of the Castle Doctrine. Likely it'll be because a jury can't convict; I figure either a hung jury or they're look at his age and like you be biased that what he did earlier in the day makes him such a sweet, honest kid and we can't ruin his life... (nevermind the lives he's ruined by his actions to others)
BTW, while people were burning the city down, Kyle was running around with a fire extinguisher trying to put out the fires.. that is when he was attacked.
That's right the arsonist attacked Kyle with a brick and then tried to take his gun away while putting out a fire..
Funny, the video doesn't show him being attacked by a brick, and I read a bag was thrown at Kyle. And you know what? Does not effin' matter. He could be the best 17 year old in the whole goddamn world, except he was illegally carrying a weapon he was not allowed to have, across a state line he had no business being to and murdered two people.
I should note that I also don't give a fuk what HIS history is either. I don't care if he's a Trump or Biden supporter, if he's a Militia wanna be, cop wanna be, or a fukin' tree hugger hippie. None of that matters to me. What matters is what he did in the moments before and after he murdered those people.
Excuse me for not giving a fukk about the people he killed.
Who he killed doesn't matter.
Also, we know you're a fukin piece of garbage and don't give a shyte about anything, no need to keep proving it.
What is funny, is you seem to be defending 1) victim with a long history of abuse against women, and 2) the other victim who was a pedophile and felon and had a gun (he was not supposed to have) and was trying to shoot Kyle.
1. I'm not defending a man with a history of abuse against women, I'm saying that it doesn't matter what his history is. In the eyes of the law, no matter how much of a fuking scumbag he was, he had as much right to life as anyone else (seeing as he was not in jail/prison)
2. see above. Though I will admit this second being a felon himself and having a gun does change things slightly. He shouldn't have been there either with a gun. And if guy two was shooting at Kyle after he murdered guy one, does that make him a good guy with a gun considering he just saw someone murdered???
Also, according to the indictments, it was the third victim who was shot and his arm grazed that had the gun, who pointed it at Kyle but wasn't trying to shoot him at all.
So you have already convicted him of a crime he didn't commit. Without a trial. Or does the trial come after the execution? I'm told it is easier to convict a person that is not permitted to defend himself.
I'm saying this kid broke the law in having a gun underage that he used in a potential crime, and while it might be a misdemeanor in WI for him to have it and carry it, what he DID with it should factor into it. As well as he left the scene of a crime. Even if he turned himself in the next day, that also should work against him.
At least he will go to trial to be determined if he does go to jail/prison or not. If it ends up he's not guilty, that's how it works, but based on what I've read about the incident, it's certainly pointing to guilt.
The cops who have killed people like Breanna Taylor haven't seen a goddamn second of jail time for that and she did SFA except for sleep in her own goddamn bed.
She probably has a bad case of "Stockholm syndrome" from watching to much CNN and CBC. :lol:
Brainwashed from being a captive of Fake News CBC/CNN :lol:
If I watched either of those, you might have something. As it is, I don't. Tryharder though.
It's called karma.
He did what all the beaten women were to afraid of doing.
Did you see a happy ending for these people in their future. How many more women would have suffered before one did them in anyway?
For the record, I'm GLAD the abuser azzhole is dead. He should'a been in jail for the rest of his life. Same with the sex offender.
However the law allowed them to be out on the streets and as much as it's a fukin' disgrace, that's how the law works.
WE only know their history because of what Kyle did that night. Kyle himself had no idea who it was he was murdering at the time. Which is WHY it doesn't matter who they were beforehand.
If they had no criminal histories at all, would you be more inclined to be less forgiving to Kyle? Somehow I doubt it.