Gun Control is Completely Useless.

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
When guns aren't available the haters will use other methods any way .
911 they used airplanes into buildings . No guns there .
The Boston marathon bombers . No guns there .
Funny though there were Muslims in both instances .


Absolutely!
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Precisely. We know you think the Department of Justice is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NRA. You've made it abundantly clear.
Listen, how many times do you have to be told!! The NRA and the Conservatives made sure that no reliable stats on guns are collected. Your Federal government is hamstrung by a wholly conservative congress majority that has up until now, made sure it stayed that way. They made sure that NO money was spent on collecting this data and even now after Obama once again tried to get this collection of data reinstated, the agency will not do it because they are being personally threatened.

For Gawd's sake inform yourself!! If someone who only spends a few months a year in your country, I am more informed than YOU are!!

Absolutely!
HAHAHA.......Is there a knife that can manage to maim or kill up to 600 people in minutes?? Or would poisoning all brands of Starbuck's coffee achieve the same ends. Oh maybe governments will consider licensing the sale of nuclear weapons.

Would you be using this argument if a particular type of automobile was used to kill this many people in such a short period of time??? Stupid, stupid arguments, are not made anymore valid by repetition.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,232
9,456
113
Washington DC
Listen, how many times do you have to be told!! The NRA and the Conservatives made sure that no reliable stats on guns are collected. Your Federal government is hamstrung by a wholly conservative congress majority that has up until now, made sure it stayed that way. They made sure that NO money was spent on collecting this data and even now after Obama once again tried to get this collection of data reinstated, the agency will not do it because they are being personally threatened.

For Gawd's sake inform yourself!! If someone who only spends a few months a year in your country, I am more informed than YOU are!!


HAHAHA.......Is there a knife that can manage to maim or kill up to 600 people in minutes?? Or would poisoning all brands of Starbuck's coffee achieve the same ends. Oh maybe governments will consider licensing the sale of nuclear weapons.

Would you be using this argument if a particular type of automobile was used to kill this many people in such a short period of time??? Stupid, stupid arguments, are not made anymore valid by repetition.
Contrary to some assertions, no number of repetitions of a lie will make it the truth.

And by the way, the U.S. has no Conservative Party.
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Quietly, Congress extends a ban on CDC research on gun violence | Public Radio International

Gun violence research: NRA and Congress blocked gun-control studies at CDC.

And there are many, many more articles to this so called "lie" How many times do I need to post this info..... I believe this is about the 10th or 12th different article on this state of affairs.

Oh and Your Republican Party is just as bone headed as our Conservative one, well maybe worse, with Trump as the main representative. They seem immune to common sense, in my opinion.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,232
9,456
113
Washington DC
Quietly, Congress extends a ban on CDC research on gun violence | Public Radio International

Gun violence research: NRA and Congress blocked gun-control studies at CDC.

And there are many, many more articles to this so called "lie" How many times do I need to post this info..... I believe this is about the 10th or 12th different article on this state of affairs.

Oh and Your Republican Party is just as bone headed as our Conservative one, well maybe not quite as bad but close. They seem immune to common sense, in my opinion.
So, what's your solution? To deny First Amendment rights to people and groups you disagree with?
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
So, what's your solution? To deny First Amendment rights to people and groups you disagree with?
Now who is being silly?? You have the right to defend your person and your home period. This does not NEED nor SHOULD include a weapon that mows down people like ten pins. Maybe, all a home needs is a good alarm system and it is much safer than an assault weapon.

Which groups and people, do you feel the need to protect yourself against?? You do realize that if every adult person were free to arm themselves with such a weapon and did so, and were permitted to cart them around everywhere they went, there would be very few left standing??

Think ahead before ahead strikes from behind!!
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,232
9,456
113
Washington DC
Now who is being silly?? You have the right to defend your person and your home period. This does not NEED nor SHOULD include a weapon that mows down people like ten pins. Maybe, all a home needs is a good alarm system and it is much safer than an assault weapon.

Which groups and people, do you feel the need to protect yourself against?? You do realize that if every adult person were free to arm themselves with such a weapon and did so, and were permitted to cart them around everywhere they went, there would be very few left standing??

Think ahead before ahead strikes from behind!!
Oddly, most states have no laws against owning or carrying long guns. Yet they're not scenes of daily mass carnage.

I'm sure that you'll claim that this fact is merely concocted by the NRA.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
A rifle which can fire up to 600 rounds per minute and you want to have a couple of people with a pistol fire on him?? Good lord, how asinine.

You do understand you have to change magazines don't you? Also I assume you do not know what rate of fire means.

There are 50 states ........and we both know that those states like Texas and Florida, do not have the same laws as Maryland. So it may be a bit safer living in Maryland, but as far as I am aware, you do not have a border between states to control the entry of restricted weapons to one that has good laws.

Like in Baltimore?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,232
9,456
113
Washington DC
You do understand you have to change magazines don't you? Also I assume you do not know what rate of fire means.



Like in Baltimore?
If the bangers and the junkies don't get you, the cops will.

Welcome to Charm City (believe it or not, they actually call it that!).

Of course, the violence in Baltimore is all a lie concocted by the NRA to push their false narrative.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
The gun makers that was used to kill the victims of Orlando should be held liable and the parents and relatives should bring a civil class action lawsuit against the gunmakers.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Lee enfield mk4
sweet
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Sorry Remington, I agree with you.

A rifle which can fire up to 600 rounds per minute and you want to have a couple of people with a pistol fire on him?? Good lord, how asinine.

Orlando gunman used AR-15 assault rifle to kill his victims - the weapon of choice for mass shooters Do you really think a couple of people pulling out their pistols/hand guns and carefully aiming would have taken him down?? He managed to kill 50 & wound 53, and you think a hand gun or 10 would have changed a thing?? Oh yes it probably would have, even more people would have died!!

Knowing how many carry in Florida, I would be very surprised to learn, if there weren't several who were carrying a weapon, who never had a chance to even get it out of their pocket. In any case, it would take another gunman carrying the same sort of weapon to counteract such a weapon. So, do you advocate everyone start carrying AR-15 assault rifles?? AWKKK... Give me a break.

I like, sticking the gun manufacturers with the responsibility making sure where such weapons end up. But that will never happen.



Nothing like stupid, ignorant people saying stupid ignorant things about stuff they know nothing about, obviously.


First off, the AR15 is NOT an assault rifle. An Assault Rifle is fully automatic and the AR15 is a semi automatic weapon. This means it fires one projectile for every pull of the trigger. Pulling the trigger once and holding it fires one projectile. That's it. You going to tell me you could pull that trigger 600 times in one minute? Also, the max clip size, that I can find, is 100 rounds ( also note, the higher round mags have a habit of jamming up), this would mean the mag would have to be changed 6 times in that one minute along with pulling the trigger 600 times.

Now, that all being said, do you now want to admit that you really don't have a fu cking clue what you are talking about and are just repeating others stupid and ignorant rants?