Prince Charles Calls Climate Deniers "Headless Chicken Brigade"

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Non-believers of Climate Change are just ignorant greedy turdlers...

http://www.cpt12.org/news/index.php/drilling-fracking-boom-causes-cancer-concerns/

The next dumb **** that says Fracking is good and Climate Change is a farse.. feel free to drive down to Big Spring, Texas and drive 10 miles west.. then stay there for the day..

The gas smell in the air from the fracking is causing soar throats.. I'm one who was effected..

Arctic Vortex, please.. climate change..

Next time stay out of the sewage treatment plant.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Temperature Follies

Posted on January 23, 2014 by Louis Hissink
The top 10 hottest years temperature pop chart has been published by NOAA

The difference between the hottest and the tenth hottest is 0.09 degrees Celsius.
This is a standard meteorological thermometer used in a Stevensen Screen

This is a close up of the calibrated scale on the thermometer

It is marked up in 0.5 degree units as detailed in the product specifications above.
You can read this thermometer to an accuracy of 0.25 degrees Celsius; that is if the mercury doesn’t line up with a mark but sits between 2 of them, then the best you could read off would be, say, 0.25 degrees Celsius.
If you represented each year with a glass of water whose water temperature matched the temperature anomaly in the table and then used the thermometer above to measure the temperature, you would not be able to read any differences between the 10 glasses of water.
Furthermore you would not be able to measure the temperature difference between 1998 and 2012 with this standard thermometer.
Therefore since 1998 to 2013 no change in temperature has occurred since we are not able to measure the change in order to verify it.
Update: The catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis (CAGW) asserts that a doubling of CO2 will cause a rise in global temperature of 2 degrees and this will subsequently cause a climate disaster. As the mean global temperature has not varied at all since 1998, but CO2 has indeed risen, then the has beCAGW hypothesis en falsified. As weather is thought to be driven by temperature differentials and gradients, but no change in global temperature has been observed and measured, then the weather cannot be driven by temperature but by some other unrecognised factor.

CAGW hypothesis falsified
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Electric Weather and the Sun

Posted on February 4, 2014 by Louis Hissink
The following short video offers another explanation for the present solar behaviour and earth weather/climate.
The crucial fact is that the sunspot number etc should be interpreted much like the speedo of an automobile, and that what is changing is the galactic electric current that drives the sun itself. Being part of this solar circuit, the earth also adapts, causing long term changes to the climate.
One thing must be understood, however, is that human emission of CO2 has nothing to do with this process except in one aspect – that it is, like the automobile speedo, an indicator and not a forcing. Life waxes and wanes according to the flow of energy along the yet to be recognised solar and galactic currents.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Electric Weather and the Sun

Posted on February 4, 2014 by Louis Hissink
The following short video offers another explanation for the present solar behaviour and earth weather/climate.
The crucial fact is that the sunspot number etc should be interpreted much like the speedo of an automobile, and that what is changing is the galactic electric current that drives the sun itself. Being part of this solar circuit, the earth also adapts, causing long term changes to the climate.
One thing must be understood, however, is that human emission of CO2 has nothing to do with this process except in one aspect – that it is, like the automobile speedo, an indicator and not a forcing. Life waxes and wanes according to the flow of energy along the yet to be recognised solar and galactic currents.





er, yup. pretty much what I wuz thinkin.


That waxes and wanes's dang poetic DB. Keep'er rollin.....................{smiley}

I met Charles.


We talked for about 2 minutes about the new Nikkor lense I was sporting that he planned on buying and photography in general.


I never met his mom yet but she did take a moment to pose for me while a I got a great shot. Maybe we can chat next time?




Some t its , eh.!!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
And this is where the tampon lover lives...



and here...



and here...



and here...



Chucky ain't aging very well. He and his wife are hard to tell apart these days. Good thing they aren't cross dressers.

Are you sure she isn't?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
er, yup. pretty much what I wuz thinkin.


That waxes and wanes's dang poetic DB. Keep'er rollin.....................{smiley}

Thers a short video at the site, 9:eek:o minutes later you can laugh with license at the CO2 suckers while they blue bag farts and dog poop.
waxin an wanein , sumtime it's cold sumtime it's hot just like grandma told us.

By the way there is no mechanism to cause a fusion sun to do that.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,716
1,880
113

He wouldn't like to hear what I call Global Warmists.

There's no denying...

Yes, there is. I'm a denier and always will be.

As for Charles, whilst he has many good views, such as on architecture, he has been a rabid enviroMentalist for many years and thus, like every other enviroMentalist, is very gullible and impressionable when it comes to all things climate. He believes everything he is told about "climate change" and finds it very difficult to see through the Great Global Warming Scam.

As for the floods on the Somerset Levels, as with so many other things that Warmists like Charles blame on "climate change" it was not long before the REAL cause of the floods was discovered.

Rather than caused by "climate change", as Charles and the other impressionable environMentalists believed (and demand we believe), the floods were actually caused by the river not having been dredged for several years. Under the National Rivers Authority rivers were regularly dredged but are now less so after it became the Environment Agency in 1996.

So it's not "climate change" which has caused the Somerset Levels floods, as the environMentalists told us in no uncertain terms. The cause was lack of dredging.

It's back to the drawing board for the enviroMentalists.

As Iain Liddell-Grainger, the Tory MP for Bridgwater in Somerset says: "This was not a freak of nature. This was an act of criminal negligence."
 
Last edited:

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Yes, there is. I'm a denier and always will be.

Yes, some people even still refuse to accept that the Earth isn't flat, despite the evidence to the contrary. Those photos from space must be faked? Deniers are people who are so obtuse as to be impervious to evidence and reasoning.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,710
9,244
113
Washington DC
He wouldn't like to hear what I call Global Warmists.
It's OK, he never will. You are less than the dirt beneath his feet to His Royal Altitude.



Yes, there is. I'm a denier and always will be.
And there you have it, folks. The Political True Believer. He makes decisions on an emotional basis, and then will ignore all new information, disregard all facts, and reject all reasoning. And studies show that he'll choose his church, his home, and certainly his media on the primary criterion of reinforcing his views and never, ever presenting new facts or rational arguments.

Classic Fox or MSNBC watcher.

See, I'm not big on global warming either. The modelling is imprecise and nowhere near comprehensive enough, and nowhere near enough to spend tons of money on, especially since that money could be spent on ameliorating known and proven pollution threats, which would work an immediate benefit AND, as an extra benefit, ameliorate global warming if it actually exists. I pay attention, and judge global warming on certian principles (data sufficiency, repeatability, validity, and predictions). Blackload, as I said, is interested in none of those things. He craves certainty above all else, and no amount of proof will ever shift him from his foreordained conclusions.

And that, kids, is the difference between a conservative and a right-winger. And between a liberal and a left-winger.

As for Charles, whilst he has many good views, such as on architecture, he has been a rabid enviroMentalist for many years and thus, like every other enviroMentalist, is very gullible and impressionable when it comes to all things climate. He believes everything he is told about "climate change" and finds it very difficult to see through the Great Global Warming Scam.

As for the floods on the Somerset Levels, as with so many other things that Warmists like Charles blame on "climate change" it was not long before the REAL cause of the floods was discovered.

Rather than caused by "climate change", as Charles and the other impressionable environMentalists believed (and demand we believe), the floods were actually caused by the river not having been dredged for several years. Under the National Rivers Authority rivers were regularly dredged but are now less so after it became the Environment Agency in 1996.

So it's not "climate change" which has caused the Somerset Levels floods, as the environMentalists told us in no uncertain terms. The cause was lack of dredging.

It's back to the drawing board for the enviroMentalists.

As Iain Liddell-Grainger, the Tory MP for Bridgwater in Somerset says: "This was not a freak of nature. This was an act of criminal negligence."[/QUOTE]
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,716
1,880
113
Yes, some people even still refuse to accept that the Earth isn't flat, despite the evidence to the contrary.



Yeah. Those people are even weirder, just about, than the Warmists.

It's OK, he never will. You are less than the dirt beneath his feet to His Royal Altitude.


Oh dear. Shame.

At the end of the day, Charles and his environMentalist mates, such as the BBC and the Grauniad, are STILL banging on about the Somerset floods being caused by "climate change" despite it now being revealed that a lack of dredging of the river there over the last twenty years is the true cause. It took just five minutes for their climate change theory for the flooding to be washed away, yet still they attack sensible deniers like me and insist that "climate change" was the cause of the Somerset floods.

These people are beyond help.


 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Yes, some people even still refuse to accept that the Earth isn't flat, despite the evidence to the contrary. Those photos from space must be faked? Deniers are people who are so obtuse as to be impervious to evidence and reasoning.

What are you talking about? I've seen a lot of places where it's flat! Ever been to Saskatchewan? -:)