I'm not the one spamming these boards constantly with anti Palestinian shyte the way you do it about Israel..
I just try to point out your hypocrisy....
I just try to point out your hypocrisy....
You want to try that again?I noticed that EagleSmack, DaSleeper and CNDBear can't write a critical thing about Israel even when it involves IDF soldiers using an 11 year old girl as a human shield.
You'd be the resident expert on double standards. You employ and exercise them regularly.You guys really have double standards....
"But they were ambushed, taken prisoner and later tortured, mutilated and murdered."
How is Dallaire responsible for an enemy ambush?
He had thousands under his command.Did Dallaire conspire with the enemy to kill those Belgium peacekeepers or did Dallaire underestimate the threat and risk? No doubt your hindsight is much better than Dallaire's foresight. Looking back, I guess Dallaire should have sent more than 10 Belgiums to the PM's house. Maybe he should have sent a battalion. Unfortunately he didn't have a battalion. All he had for that mission was 10 Belgium peacekeepers. Lots of people were dying that night and Dallaire lacked the forces to deal with every threat. If I recall, Dallaire asked for re-enforcements repeatedly for months during the run up to the Rwandan genocide and now you blame him for not having enough soldiers???? Also if he didn't sent the Belgium peacekeepers the PM would have been killed for certain. If he moved reinforcements to assist the Belgium contingent, then another slaughter would have happened somewhere else.
I saved two actually... a choking victim and a person that was hung up on electricity.How many lives have you Dallaire critics saved?
You want to try that again?
I can post a quote from you, where you acknowledge the very fact that I have written critical commentary about Israel.
This is the biggest problem with your reality, it's very selective, at best.
You'd be the resident expert on double standards. You employ and exercise them regularly.
That's true. I guess you got me on that one CB.
I guess ES still has to save 31,999 more lives before he can say you saved more lives than Romeo Dallaire. Please feel free to criticize Dallaire's inability to save more lives at that time.
That one? I've got you, on more than just one.That's true. I guess you got me on that one CB.
I'm already aware that your moral relativity makes numbers more important than acts.I guess ES still has to save 31,999 more lives before he can say you saved more lives than Romeo Dallaire.
Please feel to read back through the thread, and point out where I said anything critical about Dallaire.Please feel free to criticize Dallaire's inability to save more lives at that time.
Dude, that was harsh.
I know what you're trying to convey, but you're stepping on someone that I hold in high esteem. When you negate what he tried to do, with what he had, and what he was up against.
This is the biggest problem with your reality, it's very selective, at best.
That's true. I guess you got me on that one CB.
I guess ES still has to save 31,999 more lives before he can say you saved more lives than Romeo Dallaire. Please feel free to criticize Dallaire's inability to save more lives at that time.
That's true. I guess you got me on that one CB.
I guess ES still has to save 31,999 more lives before he can say you saved more lives than Romeo Dallaire. Please feel free to criticize Dallaire's inability to save more lives at that time.
So can you answer the question about how much blood is on your hands - Appears the Bucky Twins have problems with simply worded but clear and concise question.
If you have trouble with the way it is phrased, please ask and I will clarify it for you.
Ya know we can all use some help at times. I am always willing to help. Just the way I am.
You were asked a question a while back... which you have ignored. How about you do that first. From where I sit, it is you that has a problem. No one else.
ya... that's what I figured. I have posted it twice, not doing it again. I'm done with you.
again, numbnuts, prove what he says about the timeline between 9/11 and the invasion wrong. You can't, and therefore, like the tiny minded little man you are, you yell squirrel.
Interesting coincidence
The Mai Lai massacre was March 16, 1968.
Interesting coincidence
The Mai Lai massacre was March 16, 1968.
Afghan Villagers Were Threatened by US Troops Ahead of Massacre
Witnesses: Troops Lined Up All Men From Mokhoyan, Told Them They'd 'Pay'
...So then, I've stated that I don't support capital punishment in either our criminal justice system, or in the military justice system and yet somehow you've perceived that to be a double standard on my part...care to explain?
Furthermore, it is a scenario like this that prevents me from ever supporting capital punishment, as I don't believe people should be put down for being ill...unless of course they want to be, but that's another issue for another day...
All you have to do, is bring the quote here and post it.If I could prevail upon a mod to move this post to the following thread:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/104875-u-s-soldier-kills-up-18.html#post1563539
It would be much appreciated.
U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales’ suspected early March murder of 16 Afghan civilians is cast by the military-industrial-congressional-media complex as the isolated madness of a single American soldier. In fact, victims in the village of Kandahar are just the latest among six million who have perished in America's wars-of-choice in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and now the Central Asian graveyard of empires, Afghanistan.
That sobering estimate of death comes from John Tirman, executive director of the MIT Center for International Studies, and author of The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America’s Wars, whose arguments were recently summarized in The Washington Post essay, “Why Do We Ignore the Civilians Killed in American Wars?”
Indeed. Nice catch..
They are not ignored, just not remembered.