I've been working for years to design a weapon that deer and bears can use to even the playing field.
Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Just guns because they were designed to immobilize or kill and there are laws in the legal system on killing humans.
The gun maker advertises their product as an efficient killing machine so therefore the gun maker must go to jail when a person using their product that kills a human.
Wouldn't that make you an arms dealer, supplying both sides of the conflict?
So were bows, crossbows, knives and bats.
As does Horton, Excalibur, Ten Point and Barnet. As well as arrow/bolt/broadhead manufacturers, Carbon Express, Eaton and Muzzy.
And Tactical/combat knife manufacturers, Gerber, Buck, Kabar, Remmington.
I see your point CDNBear but the problem today is guns and the sooner we go after the gun makers who make killing machines and making them legally responsible where they go to jail the better off we will be.
Yes. I said that. So would you please amend your claim that "guns were meant to kill" to "SOME guns were meant to kill".
No, the gun manufacturer doesn't. According the the law that EXISTS, it is the shooter that goes to jail if the courts can prove it.
1, Gun manufacturers don't kill people.
2, In 2004 (Only because it was the quickest stat I could find.) 42,800 Americans were killed in car accidents.
While 29,500 were killed by guns.
You should be going after car manufacturers, driver instructors, licensing officials, legislators.
Where does it stop?
lol.
Maybe not.
Actually I think liberals do that to themselves, too, so it's hard to say whether he is an alien or really is a liberal.
Pretty much. lol
Yup.
Why not go after the head dood? The one that's responsible for everything bad?
Nah, there's two problems, criminals and people using guns who don't know how to handle them? If your 5 year old kids gets in your car, starts it up and wipe out some real estate, do you ban cars?
Some guns...............certainly not all! And what good would it do to throw the manufacturer in jail (if he/she could even be identified) while the thug is on the loose? So who would you throw in jail? Browning? Winchester? or the manager of the particular factory or the guy who actually assembed it? Or perhaps all of them? Oops jails are all full and the thug is still running around. :lol::lol::lol:
No, they mustn't.
Um, I am just wondering who it is that you want to kill and have your gun's manufacturer blamed for the killing.
hehe I can just see you now: I DIDN'T DO IT!
Nope but child welfare, the property owner etc. go after the parents or guardians of said child. Thing is even pub/tavern owners are liable if they serve too much of the product they sell. Not just the imbibers who injure or kill another person or causes damages are liable. Persons & companies are liable for producing products that cause injury or death even if they produce such benign items such as cribs, or blinds. So why not those making products who's sole purpose is to kill??
Well.....Ths is for all you anti gun folks...The long gun registry is on it's way out...you can cry and tap your little foot....:smile:
All I can say is........I'm sorry for you loss
All I can say is........I'm sorry for you loss
I'm not sure how many problems that sort of buck passing has solved! Next thing they will be putting a limit on how many kitchen knives a manufacturer can produce. How is a bartender supposed to know a person's mode of transportation? Besides I think it may just come under the heading of "minding ones own business". If you're over the age of 19 and you do the killing, you're the culprit, not John Labatt or Joe Bartender! :lol:
It stops when those with an agenda to reduce civil liberties meet that goal. At least until they move the goal posts.
With the Liberals track record of confiscating previously legal registered automatic rifles we know where the next step would lead. And according to the same liberals it is never the perps fault. If not his/her poor childhood it is at least some big bad corporation's fault.
Well.....Ths is for all you anti gun folks...The long gun registry is on it's way out...you can cry and tap your little foot....:smile:
All I can say is........I'm sorry for you loss
Liar !
The truth is that gun controls do absolutely nothing on either side of the border to remove guns from the hands of criminals, regardless of what the Liberals, NDP & Greens would have you believe. Allen Rock went into federal politics for the sole purpose of passing legislation (Long-Gun Registry) that was meant to be the start of taking ALL firearms from the citizenry of Canada, as it was his stated belief that the ONLY people in Canada who should be allowed to possess firearms was police and military personnel, but he failed to factor in that many otherwise law abiding Canadians would simply refuse to register their weapons, and he and the Liberals were actually naive enough to state that criminal would register their illegal weapons so they could be confiscated. When that didn't happen, the whole concept of the registry was a colossal failure, yet they continued to pour money into it, not wanting to admit that their plan had failed miserably. I have to say that that the recent actions of police personnel in violating the rights of citizen I have no faith whatsoever that they should even be carrying firearms.
