Subjective drivel.
Nevertheless, a growing body of evidence to indicate that that drivel is in fact fact.
There is nothing to build on top of...the security center is being constructed. You want them to wall the construction workers in?
Apparently the Port Authority does, otherwise why would their position suddenly be "they are free to build on the original site" after inexplicably ending negotiations for a land swap?
Read Yukon's link. The parties involved aren't the same. If you think all buildings and construction projects take place on the same time-scale, you're mistaken.
That's not what I think. But I do know that the church claims the port authority suddenly stopped returning calls in the midst of negotiations. That's not a natural variance in "timeline". That's ignoring.
Saying something was fast-tracked means that the committees or permitting process would have been sped up, and there's no indication that this is true.
It's my understanding that that is in fact true. In fact it happened so fast there was a committe member that expressed shock and surprise that the mosque developers didn't even own the site yet. They obviously didn't do any due diligence.
It's just empty rhetoric on your part.
Except it's not just me. :lol:
And no building yet either, in case you weren't aware...
I was aware but thanks for confirming.