The Canadian Conservative Legacy

[Socrates the Greek]

I couldn't tell. Despite spending countless hours attempting to communicate with Mhz and eao, I still can't speak or understand stupid.


As a side note, I did find this video of Soc Pupput when I was cruisin around the net. I didn't know his real name was Ruprecht..

YouTube - Ruprecht in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

Bear grow up man, is venom the fuel of your mission in this life? if it is, your fighting a demon that chokes positive energy coming your direction, your going on with your silly 6 year old mentality calling me soc puppet is not the mental chemistry you want to be on , that is not going to get you far pal. give that old game away it is bad for your soul.:idea:

 

[CDNBear]

Bear grow up man, is venom the fuel of your mission in this life? if it is, your fighting a demon that chokes positive energy coming your direction, your going on with your silly 6 year old mentality calling me soc puppet is not the mental chemistry you want to be on , that is not going to get you far pal. give that old game away it is bad for your soul.:idea:

Can you share a link to a translator for that?

I can barely make out what your trying to say, I don't speak moron either.

 

[Socrates the Greek]

Can you share a link to a translator for that?

I can barely make out what your trying to say, I don't speak moron either.

You don't have to speak it you are one.....................:lol:

 

[CDNBear]

You don't have to speak it you are one.....................:lol:

What an excellent retort, given the fact that you haven't been able to grasp the difference between Liberalism and the LPoC, despite countless piece of information. The fact that you equate popularity to quality, which couldn't be any further from intelligent, if it tried, and finally, you have yet to make a post that shows some degree of personal growth...All leads me to say....I think I'll take your opinion, with a Dux Truck load of salt thanx....

Make sure you leave that cork on your fork Ruprecht.

 

[Socrates the Greek]

What an excellent retort, given the fact that you haven't been able to grasp the difference between Liberalism and the LPoC, despite countless piece of information. The fact that you equate popularity to quality, which couldn't be any further from intelligent, if it tried, and finally, you have yet to make a post that shows some degree of personal growth...All leads me to say....I think I'll take your opinion, with a Dux Truck load of salt thanx....

Make sure you leave that cork on your fork Ruprecht.

The reason the Liberals have quantity of time in power, over the Conservatives is because they have shown quality with math, unlike the Conservatives who will have your stupid head submerged into read ink and scream give me more give me more. Get lost bear, you are playing a stupid game.

Don’t think you are intelligent, you are lying to your self, if you are going to behave like an angry idiot and expect people to like you. You are a f mess,. For brains.

There are about 24,000,000 Canadians (out of a total population of 31,000,000) over the age of 17 paying income taxes on their earnings. A $56 billion operating deficit for just one year must be borrowed from banks, pension funds, individuals who buy government "bonds" such as Canada saving bonds or treasury bonds, and other financial instruments.This debt is directly payable only by Canadian taxpayers. This year's debt alone is $56 billion, which is a $2,350 debt for the average taxpayer – you! In just one year of government deficit!


But it's worse than just a massive delayed tax when the Gov't borrows money; it sucks that money out of circulation for the use of private enterprise. Businesses that need to borrow for expansion, construction, capitalization, research and development, new machinery, and exploration, find that money available for loans is scarce and often
unavailable because government has borrowed $56 billion in one year that would have been available to business.

You call that quality? f off

 

[CDNBear]

The reason the Liberals have quantity of time in power, over the Conservatives is because they have shown quality with math, unlike the Conservatives who will have your stupid head submerged into read ink and scream give me more give me more.

It's just so sad that you just don't get it.

Get lost bear, you are playing a stupid game.

With an even more moronic opponent.

Don’t think you are intelligent, you are lying to your self, if you are going to behave like an angry idiot and expect people to like you.

Dude, if you liked me, I would have to rethink who I am, then consider a shotgun facial.

You are a f mess,. For brains.

Coming from you, that can only be taken as a compliment.

There are about 24,000,000 Canadians (out of a total population of 31,000,000) over the age of 17 paying income taxes on their earnings. A $56 billion operating deficit for just one year must be borrowed from banks, pension funds, individuals who buy government "bonds" such as Canada saving bonds or treasury bonds, and other financial instruments.

Are you going to acredit that to source you stole it from?

But it's worse than just a massive delayed tax when the Gov't borrows money; it sucks that money out of circulation for the use of private enterprise. Businesses that need to borrow for expansion, construction, capitalization, research and development, new machinery, and exploration, find that money available for loans is scarce and often

And you show yet again, you still don't get it.

You call that quality? f off

Again, you just don't get it, but you sure could supply a quote where you got that idea from.

 

[Risus]

We will find out at election time. But right now Harper is in power, not Liberals. The relevant question here is, is Harper balancing the budget, and how much deficit is he running?

What Liberals will or will not do will be presented to Canadians at the time of election campaign and Canadians will pass judgment on it. But that is really not relevant right now.

The gliberals on't be forcing an election any time soon, as they are a floundering rudderless ship, whose leader doesn't know which direction he is going. The conservative's lead continues to grow in the polls.

 

[Colpy]

The gliberals on't be forcing an election any time soon, as they are a floundering rudderless ship, whose leader doesn't know which direction he is going. The conservative's lead continues to grow in the polls.

Exactly........while the Good Ship Conservative seems to be slightly listing, and often sails in circles, while keel-hauling common sense..........the Not So Good Ship Liberal is Captained by an idiot in a blindfold, all guns firing straight down through the hull, and under full sail........with all anchors out......

 

[#juan]

Absolutely I would agree....not stupid.....and I initially fell for the 'Little Guy from Shawinigan" charm......(not enough to vote for him, he is a LIBERAL (shudder) after all)

But WOW, in power....just fricken dangerous.

I soon learned to dislike him....immensely.

A consumate politician.....and that is NOT a compliment.

It is the best thing I can say about him.

Oh yeah Chretien was a bastard alright. He inherited a country that was broke and over 600 billion dollars in debt. Cute little Kim Campbell handed Chretien a fresh 47 billion dollar deficit. You bit ch and whine about Chretien but never volunteer that Chretien had a hell of as row to hoe. He balanced the budget and pissed off a lot of people doing it. Harper was handed a ten billion dollar surplus and we don't even know how much debt he has got us into but we know it will be big.

Oh yeah, Chretien talked funny as well.

 

[Colpy]

Oh yeah Chretien was a bastard alright. He inherited a country that was broke and over 600 billion dollars in debt. Cute little Kim Campbell handed Chretien a fresh 47 billion dollar deficit. You bit ch and whine about Chretien but never volunteer that Chretien had a hell of as row to hoe. He balanced the budget and pissed off a lot of people doing it. Harper was handed a ten billion dollar surplus and we don't even know how much debt he has got us into but we know it will be big.

Oh yeah, Chretien talked funny as well.

Yeah, and Mussolini made the trains run on time..............

 

[AnnaG]

Try as you might...nobody can make me hate Cretien.....or Martin for that matter.

lol Me either, or Harpy, for that matter. I don't know any of them.

 

[AnnaG]

It's a little hard to hate Mr. Dithers.....although the infighting in the Liberal Party for years makes one imagine he was a little more vicious than he appeared as PM.

Chretien, on the other hand, a fricken mobster. Jean the Don. Using the RCMP as heavies at APEC, against the President of the BDBC when he refused to be a part of a corrupt scheme benefiting Jean, overseeing the Sponsorship scandal, partnering up with felons, appointing a mobster to cabinet, and protecting the SOB by sending him off to Denmark........and on and on and on........Jean actually achieved what should have been impossible......he made Lyin' Brian look honest in comparison........

Oh yeah, I can't stand that SOB.....despise him almost as much as Brian.......

Funny, I'm the other way around; I kind of like ChRETIeN, but dislike Martin. The guy's an aristocratic, arrogant, bombastic, silver-spooned, jerk with an incredibly twisted sense of principles and priorities and he legally damaged a lot more lives and Canada in general than Chretien did illegally.

 

[AnnaG]

Hey if you call this below quality you got serious problems in identifying what is good for you politically. And Ultimately your pocket

Nope, I wouldn't call "this below quality". So quit projecting your dysfunctional thoughts onto me. Most of the rest were not bad. If I thought you were worth the effort I would produce a list of Gliberal duds and culls to balance your measly little list of Cons. But, unlike you, I would also list the decent Gliberals. Why? Because I am not a partisan hack and I can be objective, unlike you.

 

[AnnaG]

...but did the Libs under Iggy not call for more spending to stimulate the economy?

Yup, they did.

How would they have balanced the budget?

Perhaps like Martin did? By further crippling healthcare and education transfer payments to the provinces. Jacking up student debt again.

 

[lone wolf]

Yeah, and Mussolini made the trains run on time..............

Had to.... They were running out of coal :lol:

 

[#juan]

Yeah, and Mussolini made the trains run on time..............

A good thoughtful reply. :roll: Equating any Canadian politician with Mussolini is just ridiculous.

 

[AnnaG]

what do you really think for a minute the Liberals would have presented the same math 56B in one year, come on.

I don't. I think they would have not had as big a deficit. But on the other hand, the provinces would likely be carrying the entire burden for healthcare and education. And in that case, there'd be no use for any federal involvement in healthcare and education.

Are you for real?

He is. I have my doubts about you, though.

Comparing elephants with hippos is a stretch big stretch.

They are both pachyderms, are both large, both herbivores, both love wallowing in water, etc. Oh yeah, but they look different. lmao Calling you intelligent is a bit of a "stretch big stretch".

 

[AnnaG]

Conservative legacy can be summed up very briefly. Borrow and spend. Cut taxes for the rich and screw the poor. Net transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich.

And the Glibs? Screw healthcare and education and the provinces for generations to come, hand out massive goodies to rich buddies, scam here, hither and yon, etc.

Sky high debt and sky high deficits,

The Glibs are just as bad at debt as the Cons and before the economic crunch, Harpy was paying the debt down. And there's absolutely nothing that can convince me that the Gliberal deficit wouldn't be just as large right now if they were in.

putting our descendents into hock for generations to come.

Just as Martin did to the students.

It is the usual legacy of conservatism, happens every time conservatives are in power, nothing unusual about it.

Yup, sounds pretty damned close to the Gliberal legacy. I agree.

 

[JLM]

I wonder how much the general population knows about any of these politicians. I think most of what we actually "know" is a matter of perception and we don't really know any more than they want us to know. As far as the financial situation is concerned I doubt if any of us really have a clue about it. Unless you have direct access to the books (and know how to read thema) what chance do we have? There are all kinds of numbers they can include of exclude depending on how it benefits them. I was always under the impression Chretien was probably one of the more honest prime ministers, but others think otherwise- who's right? Who knows? So I generally just stick to my first rule of thumb- they are ALL just a rotten bunch of lying cheating corrupt bastards with their snouts in the trough and their hands in my pockets.

 

[lone wolf]

I wonder how much the general population knows about any of these politicians. I think most of what we actually "know" is a matter of perception and we don't really know any more than they want us to know. As far as the financial situation is concerned I doubt if any of us really have a clue about it. Unless you have direct access to the books (and know how to read thema) what chance do we have? There are all kinds of numbers they can include of exclude depending on how it benefits them. I was always under the impression Chretien was probably one of the more honest prime ministers, but others think otherwise- who's right? Who knows? So I generally just stick to my first rule of thumb- they are ALL just a rotten bunch of lying cheating corrupt bastards with their snouts in the trough and their hands in my pockets.

Well that just doesn't make for big press.....

Party politics isn't honest politics. It's a gang fight - cammie by Tip Top