What are we doing in Afghanistan?

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
How do they still manage in these conditions to still blow up our soldiers is beyond my comprehension.

The stock pile of explosives that are left after a large military leaves a theater? If you will notice, all the soldiers killed are from IEDs. Few are killed with actuall military weapons used as they were intended.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Your comparison of losses in Russian army and American army is fundamentally wrong, because Russian army was fighting effectively another army well equipped by American weapons. People of Afghanistan are now against Americans in exactly the same degree as it was against Russians, except that now nobody is supplying them with anything. How do they still manage in these conditions to still blow up our soldiers is beyond my comprehension.


Russia in no way was fighting another army. In the initial stages that occurred, they very quickly crushed the army on the field (as did America) and resorted to Guerrilla warfare.

The amount of weapons the American's supplied is also often overstated. Most weapons, as they do now, still came from China.

And the Taliban are very much so being supplied with Weapons.


And thankfully we have Iran on our side against the Taliban, few people seem to recall amid this talks of "Stability" that when the Taliban invaded and occupied Afghanistan they began committing genocide against ethnic and religious groups, espeically Shia.

This is why Iran had to be talked out of Invading in the late 90's.

I think we should have encouraged them to invade, would have solved all our problems.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Your comparison of losses in Russian army and American army is fundamentally wrong, because Russian army was fighting effectively another army well equipped by American weapons. People of Afghanistan are now against Americans in exactly the same degree as it was against Russians, except that now nobody is supplying them with anything. How do they still manage in these conditions to still blow up our soldiers is beyond my comprehension.

I'm sorry, but your post has literally no connection with reality. at first, the Aghans were fighting the Russian bear with World War One type SMLE No. 1 Mk III .303 British bolt action rifles. Eventually they did get aid, and lots of it, from the USA and others, but even at the first, the people rose to fight in vast numbers against the Soviets and their puppets in the Afghan Army and gov't. "By the end of 1980, the 360,000 soldiers strong Afghan Army were greatly outnumbered by the rebels."

Soviet war in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you honestly believe there are 360,000 Taliban??????

In addition, the Afghan people fled the country by the million during Soviet occupation and the civil war....five million to Pakistan and Iran alone........

About one million fled the US invasion, but since the fall of the Taliban gov't 4.5 million have returned to Afghanistan.........

That's voting with your feet. And NATO is doing well.....

Afghan refugees - Google Search=

BTW, arms are being supplied to the Taliban by Iran......and much of the Pakistani Secret Service is very sympathetic......as well, money flows in from radical Islamic groups.....and you can buy any weapon in the arms bazaars of Pakistan. The Taliban do not lack arms.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
The stock pile of explosives that are left after a large military leaves a theater? If you will notice, all the soldiers killed are from IEDs. Few are killed with actuall military weapons used as they were intended.

That is hilarious.

Improvised Explosive Device..........do you know what that is??? It is a mine.....but wait!

Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

So it can't be a mine! It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???
 

benny_patrick7

New Member
Feb 1, 2007
32
2
8
I'm sorry, but your post has literally no connection with reality. at first, the Aghans were fighting the Russian bear with World War One type SMLE No. 1 Mk III .303 British bolt action rifles. Eventually they did get aid, and lots of it, from the USA and others, but even at the first, the people rose to fight in vast numbers against the Soviets and their puppets in the Afghan Army and gov't. "By the end of 1980, the 360,000 soldiers strong Afghan Army were greatly outnumbered by the rebels."

Soviet war in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you honestly believe there are 360,000 Taliban??????

In addition, the Afghan people fled the country by the million during Soviet occupation and the civil war....five million to Pakistan and Iran alone........

About one million fled the US invasion, but since the fall of the Taliban gov't 4.5 million have returned to Afghanistan.........

That's voting with your feet. And NATO is doing well.....

Afghan refugees - Google Search=

BTW, arms are being supplied to the Taliban by Iran......and much of the Pakistani Secret Service is very sympathetic......as well, money flows in from radical Islamic groups.....and you can buy any weapon in the arms bazaars of Pakistan. The Taliban do not lack arms.

Come on, there is no comparison of what Iran can provide in a hidden manner, with what Americans and Pakistan did provide in the open during Russian invasion. As far as outrage and rebellion against coalition, it is now exactly the same as it was against Russians and have no doubt, it will get worse with time, and not better.

I repeat my prediction: Afghan people will kick all invaders out and Karzai will be hanged in exactly the same manner as Najibulla (unless Americans brings Karzai with them).
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
That is hilarious.

Improvised Explosive Device..........do you know what that is??? It is a mine.....but wait!

Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

So it can't be a mine! It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???
An IED is a copper projectile powered by TNT (compared to gunpowder). A mine will go in many directions, the copper goes in one direction only, that is why they are so deadly. The Discovery Channel even shows how to make one, it is anything but hitech.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
That is hilarious.

Improvised Explosive Device..........do you know what that is??? It is a mine.....but wait!

Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

So it can't be a mine! It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???

It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???

The Americans of course. It's a course for every would be terrorists, oops I meant patriot taught by the CIA

That aside, isn't it comforting for all those arm chair military strategists to have predicted the war in Afghnaistan has been won and is over. Now the troops can come home..... um, maybe

Afghanistan could get 30,000 new U.S. troops

Estimate from top U.S. military officer is largest ever publicly suggested

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28326200/displaymode/1176/rstry/28326855/
Inside Afghanistan



updated 2 hours, 42 minutes ago

KABUL, Afghanistan - The top U.S. military officer said Saturday that the Pentagon could double the number of American forces in Afghanistan by next summer to 60,000 — the largest estimate of potential reinforcements ever publicly suggested.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
That is hilarious.

Improvised Explosive Device..........do you know what that is??? It is a mine.....but wait!

Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

So it can't be a mine! It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???


Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

Guess too many kids were getting their limbs blown off. Wait, maybe I'm wrong. Don't the people who lay mines, go back and remove them once the conflict is over?

Not likely. It's alll about the cost and money being the God of all good neocons and Republicans, it's cheaper to buy a kid crutch
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Actually removing mines is real cheap if you know where you laid them, and you won the conflict.

And no, its actually alot cheaper to just drive a flail over the area. From a military point of view it makes a damn lot of sense because those mines are all potential weapons you are just giving the enemy. Its the same reason the us burns alot of its small arms with thermite rather than pay to ship them back.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
Actually removing mines is real cheap if you know where you laid them, and you won the conflict.

And no, its actually alot cheaper to just drive a flail over the area. From a military point of view it makes a damn lot of sense because those mines are all potential weapons you are just giving the enemy. Its the same reason the us burns alot of its small arms with thermite rather than pay to ship them back.

Actually removing mines is real cheap if you know where you laid them, and you won the conflict

there the critical phrase...
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

Guess too many kids were getting their limbs blown off. Wait, maybe I'm wrong. Don't the people who lay mines, go back and remove them once the conflict is over?

Not likely. It's alll about the cost and money being the God of all good neocons and Republicans, it's cheaper to buy a kid crutch

Mines are incredibly easy to make...........any idiot can do it, as the Taliban are showing. That makes banning them a little ridiculous, especially when the major users don't sign on.

The USA was developing mines that detonated themselves after a set period of time......self-destructing, so no "surprizes" were left behind.

even so, what irritates me here is not the ban so much, but the Orwellian attempt to show the ban worked by simply calling mines something else.

I bet claymore mines are now called "high Speed ball-bearing dispensers":roll:
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
Mines are incredibly easy to make...........any idiot can do it, as the Taliban are showing. That makes banning them a little ridiculous, especially when the major users don't sign on.

The USA was developing mines that detonated themselves after a set period of time......self-destructing, so no "surprizes" were left behind.

even so, what irritates me here is not the ban so much, but the Orwellian attempt to show the ban worked by simply calling mines something else.

I bet claymore mines are now called "high Speed ball-bearing dispensers":roll:

The USA was developing mines that detonated themselves after a set period of time......self-destructing, so no "surprizes" were left behind.

Was is the operative word there. the effort didn't work very well. No sure way to tell if the sef detonated (or deactivated) and the deactivation was prohibitively expensive... so we get back to the crutch
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
That is hilarious.

Improvised Explosive Device..........do you know what that is??? It is a mine.....but wait!

Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

So it can't be a mine! It has to be a IED!

These explosions are huge..........and the amount of explosive compound used is relatively small.....this is reasonably hi-tech stuff........brought to the Taliban by...???

Yeah smart guy. A mine can be an IED but an IED isn't a mine.
The Taliban didn't do a fly over and cover a few miles of road with cluster mines. IEDs are used in a single event situation.

I see a difference.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
And you think the Taliban get their equipment from where? Hint, its from the wealthiest nations on Earth acros the mid east.

The Taliban are also NOT whats left of the US supported Forces, while some of them were mercanaries fighting in the war, by and large they were a seperate force who attacked the other forces in the civil war that started in 1992.

Basic reading on their origins.

Taliban - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Before you speak on a subject as definitive you should do at least 5 minutes of reading.

Zzarch is 100% correct on this and anyone who says that the Taliban fought against the Soviets in the Soviet-Afghan War has no clue on what the Taliban is or what their origin is. The Taliban came about years later during the Afghan Civil War, most were too young to fight during the Soviet Invasion and were created in the madras in Pakistan from young boys fleeing Afghanistan.

But even with the facts in front of them there are still folks in here that will insist that the US supported the Taliban in their fight against the Soviets when the fact of the matter is that the Taliban wasn't even around at the time.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Didn't the goody-goody lefty wackos ban mines?

Guess too many kids were getting their limbs blown off. Wait, maybe I'm wrong. Don't the people who lay mines, go back and remove them once the conflict is over?

Not likely. It's alll about the cost and money being the God of all good neocons and Republicans, it's cheaper to buy a kid crutch

It is the cheap Chinese, Soviet, and Eastern Bloc mines that are blowing off kids arms and legs. The US uses the claymore mine and aren't very user friendly. You can't bury them. They are bulky...you can't drop them from planes like the Soviets did.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
It is the cheap Chinese, Soviet, and Eastern Bloc mines that are blowing off kids arms and legs. The US uses the claymore mine and aren't very user friendly. You can't bury them. They are bulky...you can't drop them from planes like the Soviets did.


Does that include the one-and-a-half million M 14s in storage?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Aren't cluster munitions a similar color to the food aid packages that the UN has distributed by air in several occassions? These blow when picked up and they just scatter them on top of the ground rather than burying them 1by1.
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
Never even heard of them until this post. That is how much they are used in today's military.

This mine has been widely used by various countries, so uncleared minefields containing M14s do exist. Additionally, several copies of the design have been manufactured locally by countries such as India.


the USA basically gives them away to tin pot dictators as they are cheap and don't have the massive destructive firepower of the mines the US uses now to maim kids worldwide
 

Tyr

Council Member
Nov 27, 2008
2,152
14
38
Sitting at my laptop
Aren't cluster munitions a similar color to the food aid packages that the UN has distributed by air in several occassions? These blow when picked up and they just scatter them on top of the ground rather than burying them 1by1.

They are scattered, but they don't look like packets of food