Hey, how come we are fighting the 2020 election when the facts about the 2016 election are still in question?
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson stole the election.Hey, how come we are fighting the 2020 election when the facts about the 2016 election are still in question?
They must be the ones that committed treason .
More and more information about Jan 6th is coming out
Fox News asked the judge to toss out McDougal's case by arguing that "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact and that she failed adequately to allege actual malice."
Fox News argued that Carlson "cannot be understood to have been stating facts, but instead that he was delivering an opinion using hyperbole for effect," the ruling said
US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makes."
No reasonable person indeedThe ruling continued: "This 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.’”
you mean he is lying?
No. It was a defamation case. If he was lying, the plaintiff would have won.you mean he is lying?
I mean it almost sounds like the judge and Fox are saying that Carlson doesn't tell the truth.
Yep after it was revealed that there was election shenanigans going on by the oppositionY'know, Thomas Jefferson stole the election.
Must be why the court officially found only a crazy person would take him seriously.It wasn't Carlson that made the claims - he simply provided the video. Take it for what it is... after all he is a "pundit" who usually uses his opinion & hyperbole to get the information across - you know, so that the Leftists understand what he's actually saying?
Must be why the court officially found only a crazy person would take him seriously.
Theft is illegal in the U.S.of A, exept when it comes to elections!!!
Um the Dems have stated for many elections that they lost over the years that the those elections were "stolen" - guess that's ok. Ms. Clinton still says to this day that the 2016 election was "stolen" and no one says a word. How silly are people anyway?Exactly! Charge every single Republican who's stolen an election with... something!
Difference is, there is one case where a court actually did find election fraud, and overturned the result. North Carolina 9th Congressional district, 2108.Um the Dems have stated for many elections that they lost over the years that the those elections were "stolen" - guess that's ok. Ms. Clinton still says to this day that the 2016 election was "stolen" and no one says a word. How silly are people anyway?
Let’s all pick cherries , they will be ripe in a couple of months .Difference is, there is one case where a court actually did find election fraud, and overturned the result. North Carolina 9th Congressional district, 2108.
Yep, the fraud was committed by Republicans.
Feel free to provide another example that went through a court, was fully vetted by a trial, and led to the rare sanction of overturning an election.Let’s all pick cherries , they will be ripe in a couple of months .
Pretty hard to get a judgement when the case is not heard , but you know that .Feel free to provide another example that went through a court, was fully vetted by a trial, and led to the rare sanction of overturning an election.
Fill yer boots, boy.