Odd thing is hatred spouted for or against barbaric conduct tends to turn people off - thus blinding them to barbaric conduct. You're not part of ANY solution. Your venom is the same thing.
U.S. soldier kills up to 16 Afghan civilians
- Thread starter Machjo
- Start date
Okay guys....at the time of the US (and Canadian) invasion, the lunatic Taliban did not control the entire nation. The somewhat less lunatic Northern Alliance controlled some of the nation........and the US and their allies (Canada) simply took the opportunity to provide the Northern Alliance with some significant air support, some aid in weapons, and a few tens of thousands of troops.......
Absolutely correct, only Pakistan (well duh they created the Taliban lol ) Saudi Arabia and UAE recognized the Taliban as gov't of Afghanistan. Even the OIC didn't recognize their legitimacy. So yes, there was never an invasion. We picked a side and went in to help.
That's OK, right? I mean Iran's doing the same in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Gaza, and they're cool, right?
Your linkage to killing women/children to pissing on Tlaiban is really strecthing it again. But what can we expect. better. Not a chance in hell of that happening.
Myself I see a huge difference between killing women and children and pissing on Taliban corpses - Pissing on Taliban corpses is a non issue -
Goober, I've proven you wrong so many times, I've lost count:
On November 19, 2005 in Haditha, U.S. Marines deliberately shot 24 Iraqi civilians including seven children, a toddler, three women and a 76-year-old man in a wheelchair. Sergeant Sanick De la Cruz, who received immunity in return for testimony, testified that he watched Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich shoot five Iraqis who were attempting to surrender. Cruz further testified that both he and Wuterich fired into the bodies of the five after they were dead, and that he had urinated on one of the dead Iraqis.
Haditha killings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So not only did a US marine piss on a civilian corpse in Haditha, he also admitted it and got away with it.
On November 19, 2005 in Haditha, U.S. Marines deliberately shot 24 Iraqi civilians including seven children, a toddler, three women and a 76-year-old man in a wheelchair. Sergeant Sanick De la Cruz, who received immunity in return for testimony, testified that he watched Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich shoot five Iraqis who were attempting to surrender. Cruz further testified that both he and Wuterich fired into the bodies of the five after they were dead, and that he had urinated on one of the dead Iraqis.
Haditha killings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So not only did a US marine piss on a civilian corpse in Haditha, he also admitted it and got away with it.
Last edited:
How would we know if you've proven anyone wrong? You'll hijack any thread to post your twisted ball of hate completely out of context. I was wrong about one thing. Propaganda requires a bit of easily established truth. These furball rages you and OB like posting are just that....
Karzai Calls for Troops to Withdraw from Afghan Villages | Common Dreams
what part of "get out of Afghanistan" does the stubborn / arrogant USG not understand.??
Proven me to be in error. Really - Start a thread on the Buckey.
I am all out of lollipops and I just want to give you an ass whoppin.
Now put up or Fuk off.
Terror, Trauma, and the Endless Afghan War | Common Dreams
Some real TRUTHS in above artice. Just as important is the accepting attitude of some that this act is a one off. NOT the case. It has become endemic.
Real truths? As opposed to phony truths? Truths that are true as opposed to truths that aren't?
Here's a real truth that sort of doesn't include war machines or drunkenness or murdering rogues.
CBC News - U.S. soldier accused of killing Afghans had head injury
So I guess the man that went on a home-invastion style murderous rampage in the middle of the night, slaughtering small children, amongst others, has been protected by the US and will not be prosecuted for his crimes by the people he slaughtered. I wonder what would happen if a US murderer disguised as a soldeir came to Canada and did the same thing ... would the US grab their man and sneak him out of the country so that Canadians could not have justice? I think it's rather disgusting that mass murderers that are born in the US and commit their crimes in foreign countries are protected by their government.
He'd be arrested by Canadian authorities, charged, tried and released, sentenced or confined for medical treatment, as the case would require.
Ya, Canada does the same thing. For military and civilians.
Better lock your doors....
Any idea what sort of head trauma was involved, the sort of effects it might have ... and why medical science doesn't know?
Any idea what sort of head trauma was involved, the sort of effects it might have ... and why medical science doesn't know?