The Power of Positive Thinking to Reverse Aging!

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
And "John" of course is a guy who consorts with hookers. :smile::smile:
Great minds think alike. I was at a party where there were 4 guys named John. I said, all these Johns and no hookers in site.

Mental attitude has everything to do with how we appear to the world. Feeling young will make you appear young. Aging is a state of mind. I also say it is just a belief that has been held so long that we don't question it. I think that we can live a lot longer than we do if we can suspend the belief that we grow old and die. The energy that animates us is eternal.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Nope. Feeling young will make you feel young but elastin can't be made from smiling.

Is the reverse true? For example, if babies think they're old, will they grow facial hair? With their butts stuck to the ceiling? Just curious...
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Reverse to feeling young only makes you feel young? Or?

Sorry, I didn't state that very well...the reverse of the theory that feeling young will make you look young. i.e. - feeling old will make you look old. Or maybe even look at the world upside down! :lol: (It's the power of suggestion emanating from the avatar)
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
So you can't disprove it and I can't prove it, so we're even. I don't think it was ever intended that we know our destiny after we're done with this incarnation. Proving that the likes of Sylvia Browne are frauds has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of an after life. Anyway S.J. I have several anecdotes that do prove it but you don't accept anecdotes, so as far as I'm concerned this discussion is finished.

We are not even. As I have mentioned before, burden of proof is not upon me, it is upon you to prove that soul exists.

Only one side has the burden of proof. Let us take my claim that there is a two storey house on the moon made of gingerbread and Swiss cheese. You cannot disprove that claim, I cannot prove it. Does that mean that we are even, that the statement is as likely to be true as it is likely to be false?

Nothing of the sort. Until I prove it to be true, the statement is regarded as being false. It is the same thing with existence of soul. Until you prove that it exists, the default position is that it does not exist.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
In this case, 'I commonly understand' means: "I, Sir Joseph Porter, deem the true, the one, the only meaning of this word to be whatever I determine it to be, and I reserve the right to change it as I see fit. Furthermore, I stipulate that I am the one, the only, the true source for the beliefs of all world religions, despite what the learned sources of those religions may say."

That does not make sense, 'I commonly understand' is a nonsense phrase. But each to his own. You are entitled to your opinion.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
We are not even. As I have mentioned before, burden of proof is not upon me, it is upon you to prove that soul exists.

Only one side has the burden of proof. Let us take my claim that there is a two storey house on the moon made of gingerbread and Swiss cheese. You cannot disprove that claim, I cannot prove it. Does that mean that we are even, that the statement is as likely to be true as it is likely to be false?

Nothing of the sort. Until I prove it to be true, the statement is regarded as being false. It is the same thing with existence of soul. Until you prove that it exists, the default position is that it does not exist.

Well, I'm certainly glad you cleared that up for us. Thank you.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
That doesn't take rocket science to understand- I commonly understand his hesitation to visit relatives, but in this case his favourite aunt was going to be there whom he had looked forward to seeing for months......................savvy? :smile:

Again, it does not make sense. Why not say 'I understand his hesitation'? What does 'commonly understand' mean? What is common about the understanding? Anyway, show me the phrase 'I commonly understand' used in any serious writing. In my opinion, it is a nonsense phrase, it doesn't mean anything.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The commonly held opinion about reincarnation in North America is the Hindu version (or more correctly, a watered down Hindu version). It is not the only one. Just because we believe that it is what they believe doesn't necessarily make it so. Ask ten Hindus what they believe and you will probably get ten different answers. Generally reincarnation is the transmutation of the soul into another form. It does not necessarily mean on this plain of existence in the 3rd dimension. The definition of reincarnation is open to the interpretation of the believer, not the non-believer. Nothing ever is written in stone.

You'll recall there being only one path Cliffy and that path is your own individual unique conciousness/awareness. So there are as many paths as there are minds but only one for you or me and it can't ever be the same for all, it being a construct of the individual soul/mind. IMO
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
The commonly held opinion about reincarnation in North America is the Hindu version (or more correctly, a watered down Hindu version). It is not the only one. Just because we believe that it is what they believe doesn't necessarily make it so. Ask ten Hindus what they believe and you will probably get ten different answers. Generally reincarnation is the transmutation of the soul into another form. It does not necessarily mean on this plain of existence in the 3rd dimension. The definition of reincarnation is open to the interpretation of the believer, not the non-believer. Nothing ever is written in stone.

Quite right, Cliffy. And Buddhists do not believe in reincarnation, as we commonly understand the word (and as was clear from the dictionary definition I posted). Now, there may be a different, obscure meaning, that is a different thing altogether.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Again, it does not make sense. Why not say 'I understand his hesitation'? What does 'commonly understand' mean? What is common about the understanding? Anyway, show me the phrase 'I commonly understand' used in any serious writing. In my opinion, it is a nonsense phrase, it doesn't mean anything.


Geez, I thought it was a fairly simple concept. OK, try this, what it mean is he understands under usual circumstances, but not when something unusual is involved. :smile:
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Geez, I thought it was a fairly simple concept. OK, try this, what it mean is he understands under usual circumstances, but not when something unusual is involved. :smile:

Again, it doesn't make sense, JLM. 'I understand something' or 'I don't understand something', OK. But 'I commonly understand'? i think it is meaningless.

Now, if you say, 'the common understanding about something is that....', that would make sense. That means that most people have a concept of it.

Anyway, as I said before show me the phrase in any serious writing. I don't think it exists.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
There being a state of nothing is inconceivable to the human mind. So as much as we like to imagine death as the void, we can't, always something has to be after or beyond something else. I can't empty my mind far enough to conceive of what we commonly agree is the nothing of death.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Again, it doesn't make sense, JLM. 'I understand something' or 'I don't understand something', OK. But 'I commonly understand'? i think it is meaningless.

Now, if you say, 'the common understanding about something is that....', that would make sense. That means that most people have a concept of it.

Anyway, as I said before show me the phrase in any serious writing. I don't think it exists.

Maybe there is some literary giant who can explain it better than I.