I think we can all agree on what we commonly call a park bench, at least.
And "John" of course is a guy who consorts with hookers. :smile::smile:
I think we can all agree on what we commonly call a park bench, at least.
Great minds think alike. I was at a party where there were 4 guys named John. I said, all these Johns and no hookers in site.And "John" of course is a guy who consorts with hookers. :smile::smile:
Nope. Feeling young will make you feel young but elastin can't be made from smiling.Feeling young will make you appear young.
Nope. Feeling young will make you feel young but elastin can't be made from smiling.
Reverse to feeling young only makes you feel young? Or?Is the reverse true? For example, if babies think they're old, will they grow facial hair? With their butts stuck to the ceiling? Just curious...
Reverse to feeling young only makes you feel young? Or?
So you can't disprove it and I can't prove it, so we're even. I don't think it was ever intended that we know our destiny after we're done with this incarnation. Proving that the likes of Sylvia Browne are frauds has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of an after life. Anyway S.J. I have several anecdotes that do prove it but you don't accept anecdotes, so as far as I'm concerned this discussion is finished.
In this case, 'I commonly understand' means: "I, Sir Joseph Porter, deem the true, the one, the only meaning of this word to be whatever I determine it to be, and I reserve the right to change it as I see fit. Furthermore, I stipulate that I am the one, the only, the true source for the beliefs of all world religions, despite what the learned sources of those religions may say."
We are not even. As I have mentioned before, burden of proof is not upon me, it is upon you to prove that soul exists.
Only one side has the burden of proof. Let us take my claim that there is a two storey house on the moon made of gingerbread and Swiss cheese. You cannot disprove that claim, I cannot prove it. Does that mean that we are even, that the statement is as likely to be true as it is likely to be false?
Nothing of the sort. Until I prove it to be true, the statement is regarded as being false. It is the same thing with existence of soul. Until you prove that it exists, the default position is that it does not exist.
That doesn't take rocket science to understand- I commonly understand his hesitation to visit relatives, but in this case his favourite aunt was going to be there whom he had looked forward to seeing for months......................savvy? :smile:
Me too...The authority on everything has deemed to bless us with his infinite knowledge...discussion closed:roll::lol:Well, I'm certainly glad you cleared that up for us. Thank you.
The commonly held opinion about reincarnation in North America is the Hindu version (or more correctly, a watered down Hindu version). It is not the only one. Just because we believe that it is what they believe doesn't necessarily make it so. Ask ten Hindus what they believe and you will probably get ten different answers. Generally reincarnation is the transmutation of the soul into another form. It does not necessarily mean on this plain of existence in the 3rd dimension. The definition of reincarnation is open to the interpretation of the believer, not the non-believer. Nothing ever is written in stone.
The commonly held opinion about reincarnation in North America is the Hindu version (or more correctly, a watered down Hindu version). It is not the only one. Just because we believe that it is what they believe doesn't necessarily make it so. Ask ten Hindus what they believe and you will probably get ten different answers. Generally reincarnation is the transmutation of the soul into another form. It does not necessarily mean on this plain of existence in the 3rd dimension. The definition of reincarnation is open to the interpretation of the believer, not the non-believer. Nothing ever is written in stone.
Again, it does not make sense. Why not say 'I understand his hesitation'? What does 'commonly understand' mean? What is common about the understanding? Anyway, show me the phrase 'I commonly understand' used in any serious writing. In my opinion, it is a nonsense phrase, it doesn't mean anything.
Geez, I thought it was a fairly simple concept. OK, try this, what it mean is he understands under usual circumstances, but not when something unusual is involved. :smile:
And "John" of course is a guy who consorts with hookers. :smile::smile:
You are entitled to your opinion.
Again, it doesn't make sense, JLM. 'I understand something' or 'I don't understand something', OK. But 'I commonly understand'? i think it is meaningless.
Now, if you say, 'the common understanding about something is that....', that would make sense. That means that most people have a concept of it.
Anyway, as I said before show me the phrase in any serious writing. I don't think it exists.
But 'I commonly understand'? i think it is meaningless.