Let's just get it over with already...another fall election.
We don't need another election for at least 3 years. There are much better ways to squander $300 million.
Need has absolutely nothing to do with it.
A coalition would be the will of the people...those MP's are elected representatives of the people. Simple math here, which government has the greater representation of the will of the people? A government with 36% of the vote, or a government with 59% of the vote?
Not quite true. While I might be persuaded to vote for the Libs and have done so in the past under no circumstances would I support ANY dipper involvement in government. And since the Bloc is only in Quebec they do not represent much of Canada and in fact anyone that believes in Canada could not support their having a hand in running (ruining)government. Just because adding up the representation of opposition parties equals more seats than the minority government does not translate into majority representation.
Rule of thumb is "needs" take precedent over "wants". :smile:
Not quite true. While I might be persuaded to vote for the Libs and have done so in the past under no circumstances would I support ANY dipper involvement in government. And since the Bloc is only in Quebec they do not represent much of Canada and in fact anyone that believes in Canada could not support their having a hand in running (ruining)government. Just because adding up the representation of opposition parties equals more seats than the minority government does not translate into majority representation.
I like coalitions. Nobody has absolute power and people have to learn to get along, far more appropriate than the secretive and opaque crap we are seeing with our present government. Harpo has got to go. I would rather spend the money on a new election than on useless wars. Unfortunately, an election would probably not change anything as we get presented a bunch of losers on purpose.Obviously critics of coalitions are unaware of France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Israel, Britain, ...
Coalitions are common in democracies where there are more choices than just between two identical parties.
I like coalitions. Nobody has absolute power and people have to learn to get along, far more appropriate than the secretive and opaque crap we are seeing with our present government. Harpo has got to go. I would rather spend the money on a new election than on useless wars. Unfortunately, an election would probably not change anything as we get presented a bunch of losers on purpose.
Praxius, correct me if I am wrong, but is not the portrait in your first picture interchangeble, applying to any and all Prime Ministers?
Your second picture and all its implications are only applicable in Texas.
When you have a choice of parties like we do, a minority is good government.
I don't trust any of them with a majority. Secondly at the moment the Bloc is
made up of Canadian citizens. They represent the interests of Quebec true.
They are Canadians however, whether they want to be or not is another
matter. I so no reason why the Bloc could not be part of an alliance, in fact I
would trust them in an alliance more than I would, either the Liberals or the
NDP. Would I trust the Bloc to govern? No but I would trust them as part of a
coalition. The people I don't trust happen to be the Harper Conservatives.
The present government, or at least the party is really made up of social Tories,
who can't wait to bring their old Reform Agenda to the table. Fiscal Conservatives
are one thing social conservatives are another all together.
The would jam their agenda down our throat, without much in the way of debate,
as would the dogmatic greens. The Liberals and the NDP would debate things
until the substance was gone from the bill, sort of like we have now.
(yes that was tongue in cheek) before the criticism begins