Include every single event in each and you have a closer idea.Yep, it's a tough concept. I suppose a good analogy would be Monday is to weather as week is to climate.
Include every single event in each and you have a closer idea.Yep, it's a tough concept. I suppose a good analogy would be Monday is to weather as week is to climate.
Include every single event in each and you have a closer idea.
You know, these people that decide which is an annex 1 country really don't seem to have their noggins sewed on straight. China is about $2 trillion US in debt and has assets estimated at about $7 trillion, the USA is heading for 13 trillion in debt and about 50 trillion in assets, yet it's an annex 1 country and China isn't. There must be more to "annexes" than money. But it seems to me they can both afford stuff.The thinking goes Ron, that the Annex I countries can most afford to make changes first of all. The keen observer will note that the Annex I countries contributions will not meet the global requirement. Cuts will have to come in the developing countries as well.
Well, I can imagine Henry Ford had to throw a lot of money into his business when he went mechanised production. I am pretty sure that "green" technology will be the toy of the immediate future. It makes sense to get in on it soon.But the technologies initially will be expensive. A developing country that still doesn't have even an antiquated electrical distribution system, for instance, can't really be expected to go from the equivalent of rubbing two sticks together to a plasma torch.
Yup.As Annex I countries roll out the new technology, the manufacturing gets better, the processes are optimized, and the cost comes down as the economies of scale kick in.
That's pretty neighborly of them.Yesterday the big news was that Mexico, UK, Norway, and Australia promoted a plan that would setup a find to help finance mitigation, and adaptation projects in equal amounts, for the most in need countries.
It would make sense.So presumably, the long term plans are to address the most pressing needs and those who can afford it most, with the countries in the middle coming along slowly as well, and ramping up in later years.
I think everyone is making far too much of this climate summit. If we look back at it a month from now, we'll probably see what it amounted to what a vacation (and drunk) away from home on taxpayer's hook, where things were discussed, notes were taken, a lot of intentions were generated and that will be about the end of it. In 35 years of public service, of all the things I did that were a waste of time, meetings topped the list.
Pretty much. Change the attitude and awareness and being clean becomes a habit. One should start in his/her own backyard.What really baffles me is why people think all this money and sophisticated technology is required to do this. As I've suggested several times, it can be accomplished if the common man on the street just starts doing little things differently, less unnecessary driving, turn down the thermostat a degree or two, cut back on use of the electric dryer. We got ourselves into this mess one kilowatt or gallon at a time and I think that's the way we'll get ourselves out.
The Climate Summit in Copenhagen is the Topic....
The Climate Summit in Copenhagen is the Topic....
I'll split this Thread, so that it can go back on topic, & the Polar Bears
can have their own Thread with it's related discussion...
What really baffles me is why people think all this money and sophisticated technology is required to do this. As I've suggested several times, it can be accomplished if the common man on the street just starts doing little things differently, less unnecessary driving, turn down the thermostat a degree or two, cut back on use of the electric dryer. We got ourselves into this mess one kilowatt or gallon at a time and I think that's the way we'll get ourselves out.
I did wonder how the thread on polar bears appeared all of a sudden, ready made with several comments, out of thin air.
I just hope we dont see a carbon credit program,that's just a money grab and will do nothing for the environment,que in Moe strong and kyoto,dont forget moe's ties with scientology.
Whatever they do,it's just going to line the pockets of many people,if you think this will help the environment then give your head a shake,this is just round 2 of the losers that didnt get the big bucks when the Kyoto agreement was'nt hounered.Do you prefer a carbon tax? The US will have a system soon, and Canada will have to do something. Whether we adopt the American plan, or tailor our own to the same targets, will be the question.
So how do you know when we've cut back enough? Is it when you have to wear three blankets in your house to avoid freezing to death with current technology? Maybe some people would prefer walking around comfortably with new technology?
Conservation is great JLM, and it's needed, but the current technology won't cut it, not without drastic lifestyle changes that most aren't willing to commit to. If you tell people that we can solve it by living in grass huts without HD, 3G, Blue tooth, this that and the other thing, they're going to resist.
Technologies available today make that situation irrelevant. We don't need to live in grass huts. We need more sustainable methods. That is the root of it all. Sustainable. Fossil fuels are not, and the pressures they exert are not.
Whatever they do,it's just going to line the pockets of many people,if you think this will help the environment then give your head a shake,this is just round 2 of the losers that didnt get the big bucks when the Kyoto agreement was'nt hounered.
Carbon credits are just a way to make a few peeps rich and I do believe Al Gore has some ties in there.;-)
I've NEVER said "drastic" lifestyle changes, I have said several times "walk the short distances",cut the thermostat back 2 degrees, turn off unnecessary lights, recycle a bit more (like maybe darning socks instead of throwing them in the garbage and, use the outside clothes line weather permitting" No you can force people to comply but you can set a ceiling on cheap power, after the ceiling is reached, the price doubles. The more people we have who co operate the easier it will be for everyone.
I've NEVER said "drastic" lifestyle changes,
Okay, Kakato. By the way how did you come by your name on the forum, if you don't mind me asking?
Sorry, Ron... back on topic. I was just sitting here reading your post and thinking that with all the time you have spent up North, and from what I gather you do care about the environment, so what would you do? Do you have any ideas about what could be done? I am truly curious, kakato. You have a unique perspective on the question that most of us here, do not. :smile: