Well Sharia law is the one thing that is objectionable to civilized people anywhere in the
world and we will simply look the other way while these criminals take power and destroy
civilization.
So the 'civilized' solution is to kill everyone we deem to not be civilized, any idea how wrong that concept is.
Expand on the dangers of living under 'their rules?
(in part)
But the basic message of the report is based on a flawed understanding of Sharia Law, or at least some major contradictions. The report correctly states that:
…Sharia is a reference point for a Muslim’s personal conduct, not a corpus to be imposed on the life of a pluralistic society.
But then goes on to state that Sharia law is a threat to freedom and is incompatible with our Constitution. How can a reference point for your personal life be incompatible with our Constitution, which was was designed partly to protect freedom in personal life?
Sharia Law is interpreted differently by different communities of Muslims. Some are extreme, yes, but most are not. In the same nature, some Jews and Christians are extreme and most are not.
The “Sharia Threat” must sound silly to most Muslims, since for them Sharia law determines how they conduct their personal religious lives. How can prayer and fasting threaten national security?
The Sharia Threat theory is based on an ill-advised understanding of Sharia law that allows an extremist, anti Muslim group to cherry-pick phrases from Muslim sacred texts. The selected phrases are used to paint an incorrect picture of Sharia law. The same could be done with the Bible, or the Torah.
Sharia Law › What is it?