Syria Has Started Mixing Chemicals Used To Make Sarin Gas…

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
First of all you mention CIA Central Intelligence Agency, first of all there is nothing
intelligent about them first misnomer.
Secondly should I mention Iraq and the weapons of mass destruction they had
inside information on that one too.
This is as old as history putting out stories to stir up the masses so we can pick a
fight or intervene in one already on going.
The problem is we will attack out enemies to bring them down and put our future
enemies in power is there something wrong with this picture.
In Libya they want Sharia law in Egypt they want Sharia law in Syria they will want
Sharia Law.
Well Sharia law is the one thing that is objectionable to civilized people anywhere in the
world and we will simply look the other way while these criminals take power and destroy
civilization. At some point its is time to put our weapons away and refuse to fuel madness
or if they really want the worlds most powerful weapons, we should use them on Them
first.
Has it not dawned on people you can't make peace with madmen or bullies and tyrants
or do our leaders just not get it.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Well Sharia law is the one thing that is objectionable to civilized people anywhere in the
world and we will simply look the other way while these criminals take power and destroy
civilization.
So the 'civilized' solution is to kill everyone we deem to not be civilized, any idea how wrong that concept is.

Expand on the dangers of living under 'their rules?

(in part)
But the basic message of the report is based on a flawed understanding of Sharia Law, or at least some major contradictions. The report correctly states that:
…Sharia is a reference point for a Muslim’s personal conduct, not a corpus to be imposed on the life of a pluralistic society.
But then goes on to state that Sharia law is a threat to freedom and is incompatible with our Constitution. How can a reference point for your personal life be incompatible with our Constitution, which was was designed partly to protect freedom in personal life?
Sharia Law is interpreted differently by different communities of Muslims. Some are extreme, yes, but most are not. In the same nature, some Jews and Christians are extreme and most are not.
The “Sharia Threat” must sound silly to most Muslims, since for them Sharia law determines how they conduct their personal religious lives. How can prayer and fasting threaten national security?
The Sharia Threat theory is based on an ill-advised understanding of Sharia law that allows an extremist, anti Muslim group to cherry-pick phrases from Muslim sacred texts. The selected phrases are used to paint an incorrect picture of Sharia law. The same could be done with the Bible, or the Torah.
Sharia Law › What is it?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Has it not dawned on people you can't make peace with madmen or bullies and tyrants
or do our leaders just not get it.

You got that right. I remember years ago there was speculation that Saddam had W.M.D.s buried in Syria so I wouldn't put it past those buggers to be capable of a little mischief!.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You got that right. I remember years ago there was speculation that Saddam had W.M.D.s buried in Syria so I wouldn't put it past those buggers to be capable of a little mischief!.
Where is Walter when you really need him?
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,388
1,065
113
Isn't there a Geneva Convention which prevents the use of Country & Western music against any enemy?

:?P
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Unlike Iraq from 1995-2003, Syria possesses chemical weapons. That's not the debate. What is debatable are news reports that Syria may have processed precursor chemicals into chemical weapons. If true, Syria would use them within a relatively short period of time, as many CWs are unstable and/or dangerous to store in their weaponized form. If a few days or weeks go by and nothing happens, then we can chalk these reports up as more manipulative propaganda.

You'd think that more of us would be more skeptical after our leaders and MSM manipulated fear of Iraq's CW stockpiles in order to generate support for an unprovoked war which has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians. The reports about Iraq's WMD threat turned out not to be exaggerated, but complete fabrications.

IMO, I suspect intelligence agencies detected unusual activity at Syrian CW facilities, causing the US to issue a stern warning. The activity could be preparations for using CWs or the Syrian government could be taking prudent measures to ensure their CW facilities don't fall into rebel hands.

I agree with the US issuing a warning. But acting without supporting evidence yet again would be a mistake.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
" as many CWs are unstable" Unlike you I suppose, got any links to something other than your imagination.

Saddam claimed all the chemicals, that is why the US hijacked the disclosure and eliminated many, many pages showing what the US (and Allies) had sold them. What better way to let the rebels know what they will be getting next, Syria able to hack those new radios already?? lol

How about some testimony from some 'boots on the ground'


Assad to RT: 'I'm not Western puppet - I live and die in Syria' (EXCLUSIVE) - YouTube
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
What are the odds that any gas is sent in by NATO?

The mortar used to attack the Turkish town of Akcakale is a design specific to NATO and was given to Syrian rebels by Ankara, according to Turkey’s Yurt newspaper. The mortar killed one adult and four children from the same family on Wednesday.
An article by the paper’s Editor-in-Chief, Merdan Yanardag, states that the newspaper received information from a reliable source, which claimed that Turkey itself sent the mortars to rebels in the so-called "free army."


Misfire: NATO mortar
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Foreign nationals fighting against the Syrian gov't are mercenaries.

Foreign nationals fighting against US, Canadian, or Allied forces, are freedom fighters.

Got it.

Since the US Canadian and Allied forces are also foreign nationals yer point holds your hat up and nothing else. Typical rubbish comment from you. When will your supervisor get back from Israel and take control of your wild tongue?

Who is training them? Good alQaeda or Bad alQaeda?

Old School "training by alCohol"?

We have always been at war with AlQuaeda. We have always been firm allies with AlQueada. Orwell would understand today when we do not.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You need spelling lessons, correctly spelled is like this, ' foreign terrorists'.
Gotchya, foreign nationals fighting against US, Canadian and Allied forces are actually foreign terrorists.

Thanks for clearing that up.

You just referenced the Baghdad sniper as a 'freedom fighter'?
I did?

Typical rubbish comment from you.
Which usually means I'm right.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Gotchya, foreign nationals fighting against US, Canadian and Allied forces are actually foreign terrorists.

Which usually means I'm right.
Again you fall flat on your face, .... The Syrian Army/Air Force are Nationals, the ones hired by (US, Canadian and Allied forces, NATO for short) are the foreign nations so we not only morally support terrorists but we finance all their 'crimes'. Repeat that so I know you comprehend it.

No. you are usually wrong so you didn't get that part right either.
 
Last edited: