Pledges don't mean $hit. Unless they are prepared to put up hard cash to back their words it is all a waste of paper.
Oh, the China "deal"....what a laugh!! China needs do NOTHING until 2030, and now is blocking any move from environmentalists to inquire about process or progress over the intervening 15 years.....some deal!!
And now:
China rejects US-sought carbon pledge review at UN climate talks | South China Morning Post
Once again, Obama has proven himself an idiot.
As if the US Senate would pass any such foolishness anyway.
Meanwhile, David Suzuki still wants climate skeptics jailed (a la Galileo)
Anyone that believes this crap needs their head examined.......
China is going to grow emission by huge leaps until 2030..........
why do you continue to perpetuate this bullshyte? You know it's false, I've shown it to be false a brazillion times over... each and every time one of you purposeful misinformers throws down this "do NOTHING" nonsense... and yet you continue!
standard Colpy! Have you read the actual clause... it reads as if any country, any NGO... possibly even any environmental group, can simply throw a question/challenge to any country to review their plans. Considering there's 1.5 million NGO's in the U.S. alone... it's a stupidly written draft clause that needs to be improved on. In the recent U.S.-China agreement both countries agreed to allow each other the access to question/scrutiny each others plans/progress...
China is going to grow emission by huge leaps until 2030..........
You've shown nothing to be false, you've galloped off on a couple of idiotic tangents.....but that is about it.
and yet another 'out of context' play by Colpy! Stay consistent Colpy, stay consistent! :mrgreen:
ok Colpy... although repeating this graph will cause member 'taxi' to implode... it just needs to be done!
ya see... China can't keep on, as many claim, "doing nuthin" (aka Business-As-Usual (BAU)), and reach the peak pledge level (cutting its net carbon pollution between 2015 and 2030 by about 20 billion tons.)... notwithstanding as a part of the U.S.-China deal, China has pledged to increase the share of energy consumed from non-emissions sources like renewables, nuclear energy and hydro-electricity to 20 percent by 2030in reality, on it's current trajectory, it is the U.S. pledge that will require the U.S. to do, relatively speaking, NOT MUCH MORE than maintain it's current BAU interests... to date, U.S. emissions are already 10–15% below 2005 levels (which aligns with the prior 2009 pledge Obama made to reach a 17% reduction by 2020... the same pledge Harper made but refused to even address). To date, U.S. emissions are falling by about 1.5% per year... for the U.S. to reach the pledged target of 26–28% emissions cuts below 2005 levels by 2025, the U.S. will only be required to continue its current ongoing rate of yearly emission reductions.![]()
Is a pledge binding?
I wonder if the results from this pledged projection were peer reviewed by Mikey Mann and the IPCC?
Right....take China's side!! lol
BTW, the idiot non-agreement between the USA and China is going nowhere.........Obama is done like dinner.
And yes, the greatest party of mass murderers to ever exist on earth, the Chinese Communist Party, has rode the political spectrum from communism to fascism.
And you are right (smelling salts for Waldo, please) about there being too many inquisitive NGOs prying into every nation's business.....but China is not trying to limit their bureaucratic responsibilities, they are trying to shut down all investigation and inquiry. It is a secretive, fascist cult running China.........one that just made a fool out of Obama.
ok Colpy... although repeating this graph will cause member 'taxi' to implode... it just needs to be done!
ya see... China can't keep on, as many claim, "doing nuthin" (aka Business-As-Usual (BAU)), and reach the peak pledge level (cutting its net carbon pollution between 2015 and 2030 by about 20 billion tons.)... notwithstanding as a part of the U.S.-China deal, China has pledged to increase the share of energy consumed from non-emissions sources like renewables, nuclear energy and hydro-electricity to 20 percent by 2030in reality, on it's current trajectory, it is the U.S. pledge that will require the U.S. to do, relatively speaking, NOT MUCH MORE than maintain it's current BAU interests... to date, U.S. emissions are already 10–15% below 2005 levels (which aligns with the prior 2009 pledge Obama made to reach a 17% reduction by 2020... the same pledge Harper made but refused to even address). To date, U.S. emissions are falling by about 1.5% per year... for the U.S. to reach the pledged target of 26–28% emissions cuts below 2005 levels by 2025, the U.S. will only be required to continue its current ongoing rate of yearly emission reductions.![]()
again... as you've been repeatedly apprised, the China of today is not your boogeyman China of 50-100 years ago! I mean, c'mon... you've been all about another of your 'out of context pays' concerning "JT's admiration of the Chinese dictatorship", and yet you turn a purposeful and self-serving blind-eye to Harper's absolute admiration and luvin for that Chinese Dick!
.
Yeah...tell it to Tibet, to the political prisoners, to those promised continued democracy in Hong Kong, to the Falun Gong, to the Christian church in China, to the Dalai Lama, to the dead of Tianamen Square.....your accusations against Harper mask you own lefty need to love dictatorship, just like your brain-dead hero, the guy who admires not just China, but that dictatorship.
Harper makes trade deals, the world being what it is, he is doing the best for our economy.
Trudeau praises mass murderers.