no silly! Not the graph itself... the link, the link! Just like you do with your buttHurtin' pics. You know, visual aids! Except in my case this actually relates to the OP... your buttHurtin' pics, not so much!
Still hurtin' are ya?

no silly! Not the graph itself... the link, the link! Just like you do with your buttHurtin' pics. You know, visual aids! Except in my case this actually relates to the OP... your buttHurtin' pics, not so much!
no silly! Not the graph itself... the link, the link! Just like you do with your buttHurtin' pics. You know, visual aids! Except in my case this actually relates to the OP... your buttHurtin' pics, not so much!
What value is one's word given to a barbarian? What value is an agreement without verification?
I am worried about the children.
Still hurtin' are ya?
Because it was a lie apparently.
Those ears would sport a fluffy set of flip flops.
It took only two days for Abbott's 'conversion' to climate change to be exposed | smh.com.au
Ahh...you're confused.
It is Justin that loves Communist dictators.
Not Harper.
you're sure fixated on that purposely tailored and incomplete quote. Here's a thought: why don't you actually present the full and complete JT quote... perhaps do it in an appropriate Canadian Politics forum thread. Sure you can!
The COMPLETE quote....now perhaps you could point out how that is not a worrying comment, keeping in mind that the Chinese Communist Party has murdered between 50 and 70 million people..
that's right... context, the thing you're purposely avoiding with your cherry-pick. Even within your cherry-pick statement, there's nuance in the words, "a level of admiration"... and "basic dictatorship". In keeping with your "commie under your bed" boogeyman fear, you choose to assign that nuance to a period in China that doesn't exist anymore. Like I said, if your boy Harper can deal with modern China, so should you be able to without attempting to fabricate for your perceived partisan gain. Outside of your direct cherry-pick you lose the context of the "most admired" type of governing that was stated in relation to Canadian territorial governance. Of course, your cherry-pick also avoids the 2 zingers that have overall contectual significance: one, that the most preferred admired territorial governing (like municipal governing) has people, "pulling together to try and solve issues rather than to score points off of each other"... and... two, the quip stating that "Sun News can now report about a China preference", has proven a brazillion percent true! :lol:
like I said in the other threads like discussion... you need to get with the modern times. You're fixated on a 50+ years back China, not the China of today! You know, the China of today that your boy Harper is so admiring of... so intent and fixated on securing trade with and investment from... the China of today!
I think the point that we continue to propel the China that Colpy so dearly hates, must've gone over his head.
I think the point that we continue to propel the China that Colpy so dearly hates, must've gone over his head.
China should be isolated economically, and contained militarily.
Unfortunately, nobody is listening.
If you've read back you will see that I have said:
The worst mistake of the west in the 20th century was opening up China.
China should be isolated economically, and contained militarily.
Unfortunately, nobody is listening.
And yes, I hate mass murderers, despots and tyrants.
Okay, barring your extreme view of how to diplomatically deal with China (lol), you do realize that the government that props up this communist regime is the government that you support right?
And if the problems that come from propping up that state are as widespread and damaging as you say they are, then that pretty much nullifies any "good" that the Canadian government has done.
I hope these logical premises are evident to you now.
he sure does turn that Colpy blind-eye to Harper's admiring zeal for Chinese trade/investment. At least he's dropped his repeated reference to 70 million people killed... which was the point of context for suggesting to him that China of 50-100 years ago isn't the China of today. Of course, being this boards raving gun-fanatic, it's quite telling that he would highlight current Chinese fails (with accompanying deaths in the "hundreds") while ignoring gun violence, gun deaths, gun suicides, etc., in the U.S. with deaths regularly in the tens of thousands yearly... and impacts to hundreds of thousands related to gun violence (2011 U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey for 2011 => ~ 500,000 firearm victims in non-fatal gun violence). Notwithstanding, for example, the veritable for profit prison industry in the U.S. (that his boy Harper so wanted/wants to emulate), the U.S. incarceration rate, and the U.S. execution numbers... not Chinese numbers, but hey 'Rethuglicans are on the rise', so stay tuned!
least of all... apparently, your boy Harper... so admiring of that Chinese yaun... a real Harper 'yen for the yaun', hey!
.....you can't tell the difference between liberty and slavery.
so... all that gun related death/violence... that's "liberty", hey? Liberty from who/what? "FREEDOM"... uhhh... from who/what?
slavery? You mean gun "activists" slaves to the gun industry, gun lobby... that slavery?
anyway, thanks for showcasing your very self-serving view on which death/violence conditions actually count in your assessment, and which ones you give an absolute "LIBERTY" pass to?