The only difference is the information provided. If the reports do not state that warnings were issued out, then one can only go by what is given. If it does state that the US, Canadian, or any other troops gave warnings and attempted to prevent the situation from occuring, then once again.... you can only go by supplied information.
The more information provided, the more informed the public can be and the less critism there might be.
We give out those warning too. Spare me the "Blow em' up and plant weapons" BS. We've been accused of being trigger happy and not giving out warnings. Just like the Canadians stated they gave warnings...the US guys state the same thing.
The difference is you want to believe US soldiers are trigger happy and Canadian soldiers aren't.
Let me give an example...
"Today...US Soldiers shot up a car of Italian special operations agents. The US Soldiers said the car failed to stop after given warning to do so."
Reaction of certain CANCON Members- TRIGGER HAPPY AMERICANS!
And...
"Today Canadian soldiers shot up a car of security guards. The Canadian soldiers said the car failed to stop after giving warning to do so."
Reaction of certain CANCON Members- Well at least we aren't like those TRIGGER HAPPY AMERICANS
Do you see what I am getting at?