Why anyone would think rail cars are safer than pipelines is beyond me. Aside from their rather dismal record of staying on track rail lines tend to go for the center of every town along their rout while pipelines go around.
Why anyone would think rail cars are safer than pipelines is beyond me. Aside from their rather dismal record of staying on track rail lines tend to go for the center of every town along their rout while pipelines go around.
I could pick that apart too. Healthier appearing boosted by multiple drugs, while rates of cancer and diabetes are escalating. Longer lives hooked up to tubes and wires. Comforts often financed by money we can't afford to borrow. Facts can be very deceptive...............like politicians!
You do realize topic is trains jumping tracks and fire?...
You do realize that the average life expectancy in Europe in the 1600's was just 35 years old and didn't increase significantly untill into the 20th century after the increased use of petroleum products and the scientific medical discovery's that it enabled.
You do realize topic is trains jumping tracks and fire?...
Yep! Boom, boom, boom boom!You bet and penicillin probably played the biggest role. The diseases today are more those of neglect!
Yep, trains loaded with oil and jumping the tracks!
This town is where El Barto lives. In fact, the bar he goes to for an occasional beer was wiped out. My webmaster and friend that goes by the nick of "BSD Guru" also lives there. Luckily neither were in proximity of the blast.
The real issue is routing. Trucks carrying dangerous goods are usually routed around populated areas unless the specific cargo they are carrying is being delivered. What these rail companies do is sneak through town when everyone is sleeping. There should be bypasses built for this sort of thing.
Bypasses would be cheaper than pipelines. They should also run shorter trains. Would help reduce the chance of derailment considerably.
Where they park that train is 6 miles way from Lac Megantic , from there it is a gentle slope to down town Megantic... a drop of 350 feet.They said the conductor parked the train in Nantes which is a routine procedure. He waits there for another train heading west that also stops in Nantes a couple of hours later. There the conductor and crew change trains to head back to their home station.
The whole center of town was flattened and they have no idea how many people are dead. They had evacuated 1000 people but this afternoon the had to widen the evacuation area because of toxic smoke.
My thoughts and prayers are with them.
You may be right. I believe we have the technology to ween ourselves off oil and don't really need either pipe lines or bypasses. But since oil is the richest corporate entities on the planet, that technology is being suppressed.Not sure I agree with you there.
As to cost, our rail infrastructure costs a great deal of money to maintain and is very run down. Building the required lines to bypass populated areas (which I support) would cost a great deal of money. I don't have the figures, but I am willing to bet that a pipeline would be better.
You may be right. I believe we have the technology to ween ourselves off oil and don't really need either pipe lines or bypasses. But since oil is the richest corporate entities on the planet, that technology is being suppressed.
Longer trains, two-person crews and deferred maintenance are cost-cutting measures. None of it explains how the brakes released on a tied-down train....Yay! El Barto lives! I miss his sense of humour.
Bypasses would be cheaper than pipelines. They should also run shorter trains. Would help reduce the chance of derailment considerably.