Thanks for playing!
Lol, is everything a game? I asked an honest question. Thanks for the info.
Is there anything more specific about the actual offers? That seems more focused on what Carney said.
Last edited:
Thanks for playing!
Rubbish. You lot would have gone into your typical Canadian cringy liberal mode and left them to rot in the prison, as is evidenced by the comments right here on this thread.
If you did turn up, it would have been in environmentally-friendly, electric driven tanks that were coloured pink to make them appear more gay-friendly.
Lol, is everything a game? I asked an honest question. Thanks for the info.
Is there anything more specific about the actual offers? That seems more focused on what Carney said.
Rubbish. You lot would have gone into your typical Canadian cringy liberal mode and left them to rot in the prison, as is evidenced by the comments right here on this thread.
If you did turn up, it would have been in environmentally-friendly, electric driven tanks that were coloured pink to make them appear more gay-friendly.
You wouldn't be here today if it weren't for Canada.
You're welcome.
Well seeing that he was the White House Press Secretary and it does not get more specific than what he said what else could you possibly want?
It wasn't the white house press secretary who made any mention of trading him for five prisoners. In your quote it is a reporter(who's name is not mentioned) who says that.
Do you have more info regarding that, the specific offers made?
Yes a reporter asked the question and Jay Carney answered. All relevant to the discussion.
If you want specifics feel free to google it because I don't do errands for lazy people.
I thought the whole reason that you made that claim and then followed it with that was because you were trying to substantiate the fact that these 5 guys were exactly what the Taliban wanted from the start?
They were and I did.
I cannot help it if you cannot keep up with current events.
This really seems to be more about Carney apparently lying. There is no focus on authenticating the claim in the question, seeing as they don't even bother to identify the reporter either.
Typical response from you as I expected.
What else could you expect?
Who would consider a question from an unnamed reporter as proof of anything?
This seems to be a pretty common tactic around here. Make a baseless claim, post something that in no way substantiates that claim, and then get mad that people wont accept it and just resort to insults.
Always fun.
bergdahl's home town in idaho has cancelled the parade to honor his return.
You're right. I know you have ZERO common sense and I should not have expected much more than your idiocy.