Poll: Are You Happy With Trudeau?

Are you happy with Trudeau?

  • Yes

    Votes: 12 30.8%
  • No

    Votes: 27 69.2%

  • Total voters
    39

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
I voted yes because he replaced Harper for the most part. i think the Liberals are
more progressive and more for the middle class and younger people. I have a
number of grand kids with families of their own and they really like him the hated
Harper with a passion. As for policy he is rebuilding the public service and is in
the planning stages for a number of programs.
Over all I am more positive than I was.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,565
8,159
113
B.C.
I voted yes because he replaced Harper for the most part. i think the Liberals are
more progressive and more for the middle class and younger people. I have a
number of grand kids with families of their own and they really like him the hated
Harper with a passion. As for policy he is rebuilding the public service and is in
the planning stages for a number of programs.
Over all I am more positive than I was.
To bad your grandchildren have to pay for our stupidity .
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,340
4,039
113
Edmonton
I voted yes because he replaced Harper for the most part. i think the Liberals are
more progressive and more for the middle class and younger people. I have a
number of grand kids with families of their own and they really like him the hated
Harper with a passion. As for policy he is rebuilding the public service and is in
the planning stages for a number of programs.
Over all I am more positive than I was.



Have you actually had a real discussion with those "younger people" to find out why they support him? Huh? Because I have and so have several of my friends and you know what? They haven't a CLUE as to why he should become PM - because they didn't like Harper. Why didn't they like Harper? Cuz he's wasn't as "kool" as JT!! That's who voted him in.


Unbelievable!
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Have you actually had a real discussion with those "younger people" to find out why they support him? Huh? Because I have and so have several of my friends and you know what? They haven't a CLUE as to why he should become PM - because they didn't like Harper. Why didn't they like Harper? Cuz he's wasn't as "kool" as JT!! That's who voted him in.


Unbelievable!
So your small selective group is an accurate representation of the whole country?? It seems to indicated the young people in your group are politically uneducated and they would seem to be the result of the 'elders' in same said group as being slack about giving the 'kids' the information they need to make an informed choice.
Way to clue us in that you are from a dysfunctional group. (like it was a secret)

Unlike the previous Canadian Prime Minister this one is accessible to the people.
They really should have chosen another unemployed worker from AB for that meeting at the 'Principal's Office'. He could have at least suggested he was thinking of becoming a weed dealer.

There is a pill for that. No vote required. Even tax deductible with a doctors note.
She doesn't need meds, just company that is more balanced about what should be an issue and what is fluff for the resident trolls. (somewhat like yourself now that you have chirped up my little chickadee)
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
So your small selective group is an accurate representation of the whole country??
Sure, just like when 1000 people or less are polled it somehow equates to the opinion of 35 million people.


I mean look at Flossie, the dude's a poll ho'.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,269
2,901
113
Toronto, ON
So your small selective group is an accurate representation of the whole country?? It seems to indicated the young people in your group are politically uneducated and they would seem to be the result of the 'elders' in same said group as being slack about giving the 'kids' the information they need to make an informed choice.
Way to clue us in that you are from a dysfunctional group. (like it was a secret)

Seems pretty much the same as what I have heard when that group is interviewed. That's what you get when you have a generation that can only think in 140 character sentences.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Isn't that the limit for 1 text? I was going to count your letters but you probably already have the answer.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,340
4,039
113
Edmonton
I voted yes because he replaced Harper for the most part. i think the Liberals are
more progressive and more for the middle class and younger people. I have a
number of grand kids with families of their own and they really like him the hated
Harper with a passion. As for policy he is rebuilding the public service and is in
the planning stages for a number of programs.
Over all I am more positive than I was.



Grumpy - do you know what the term "progressive" even means nowadays? Seriously. It's not a good term - it's a term that has lost its initial meaning. Being a "progressive" means the following:


- tolerating no opinions and disagreeing with the progressive philosophy means you're a bigot or racist or some such.
- no responsibility for anything (i.e. its always someone elses' fault)
- every woman and child are "victims" of something
- everyone who actually is successful must pay for those who aren't. It also means that if you have something that I want, then I
expect that you will pay for it because I can't and/or won't and it's simply not fair.
- Do not have common sense because ideology rules


That's what being "progressive" means It means being divisive instead of reconciling; it means "my way or the highway" because any other way means that you are ignorant or just plain dumb. We can't learn from History because that's in the past.


This ideology will break not only this country but any country that holds this ideology will suffer the consequences.


I'm thinking Grumpy, that the word "progressive" (at least I hope) means something very different to you then those items above. People seem to thing being "progressive" is very "cool" but its not because of what it means today.


Personally, I used to think progressive meant "forward looking" and "developing" society for the better for everyone and every person's opinion is valued and taken into consideration before decisions are made. Huh, what is that called .... oh, I know - compromise!! The ability to agree to disagree instead of being called names. Apparently that is not so. Look at our universities and colleges - demanding that only what they approve of be allowed on campuses - no alternative opinions allowed. That's being "progressive" - to me that's being REGRESSIVE and that, in and of itself, is extremely dangerous!


So Grumpy, I would REALLY hesitate before I called myself a "progressive" or agree to the "progressive" ideology because it may not be what you think it is.


Just sayin'


Dixie
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
I wasn't happy with Harper and his social conservative vision to start with
I wasn't happy with the program direction he lad out and the only thing I
approved of was keeping the Jets flying in the Middle East except I think
we should be bombing all targets including the Muslim rebels against
the Syrian Government and the reason is they are Terrorists backed by
other states in the region.
Other than that i don't mind Trudeau for the most part he is not Harper and
that is the first plus. Now if we actually engage in representation by anything
other than first past the post that is beyond rhetoric I will be a little ticked

Dixie Cup Progressive has many terms I agree with bringing people in
the main stream together and I agree with keeping the right wing out of
office
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Not in the least - his old man was a total disaster and he's on track to be worse and he doesn't f**king listen- just arrogant and very little practical knowledge. Yeah He's got his 25,000 refugees here and half of them have nowhere to live and he's already talking about bring in 12,000 more. How f&&king stupid can you get?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,565
8,159
113
B.C.
I wasn't happy with Harper and his social conservative vision to start with
I wasn't happy with the program direction he lad out and the only thing I
approved of was keeping the Jets flying in the Middle East except I think
we should be bombing all targets including the Muslim rebels against
the Syrian Government and the reason is they are Terrorists backed by
other states in the region.
Other than that i don't mind Trudeau for the most part he is not Harper and
that is the first plus. Now if we actually engage in representation by anything
other than first past the post that is beyond rhetoric I will be a little ticked

Dixie Cup Progressive has many terms I agree with bringing people in
the main stream together and I agree with keeping the right wing out of
office
Yet you also don't believe in man made global warming .
PM Harper kept government spending and commitments down in this area , but you are happy with PM Trudeau shoveling your grand children's money away on this scheme .
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
I wasn't happy with Harper and his social conservative vision to start with
I wasn't happy with the program direction he lad out and the only thing I
approved of was keeping the Jets flying in the Middle East except I think
we should be bombing all targets including the Muslim rebels against
the Syrian Government and the reason is they are Terrorists backed by
other states in the region.
Other than that i don't mind Trudeau for the most part he is not Harper and
that is the first plus. Now if we actually engage in representation by anything
other than first past the post that is beyond rhetoric I will be a little ticked

Dixie Cup Progressive has many terms I agree with bringing people in
the main stream together and I agree with keeping the right wing out of
office

The rest of us are more concerned with keeping the left wing out of office because they have proved they are not fiscally responsible. For the most part they are not even socially responsible because they are more concerned with the demands of non contributors and their patsies than working Canadians.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
I was really taken aback when I read that the government and the opposition granted themselves a nice little pay raise to help with office costs.