BREAKING: Police say 5 pedestrians deliberately run down in London were targeted because they were Muslims
Police say 5 pedestrians deliberately run down in London were targeted because they were Muslims
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
It is a tragedy. You have to feel for that family.
That said, isn't it funny when something like this happens, it is automaticly terrorism or a hate crime, but if a minority does it, it is mental illness? This clown that did this is obviously mentally ill.
That said, isn't it funny when something like this happens, it is automaticly terrorism or a hate crime, but if a minority does it, it is mental illness? This clown that did this is obviously mentally ill.
This is about that time I wish they had the death penalty in Canada.
I hope he spends the rest of his life in prison and every single day is a living hell.
I hope he spends the rest of his life in prison and every single day is a living hell.
Several years back a family of Japanese long time residents covering 3 generations was wiped out by a drunk driver near here. That must have been an act of terrorism as well.
It was a terrorist attack. His aim was to strike terror into the hearts of a population by attacking innocents. That is the definition of terrorism.
He isn't mentally ill (as far as I know), he is evil.
For mass murder, the death penalty should be reinstated.
I agree he is evil , however he must be mentally ill of some sort , well adjusted people don’t wake up in the morning and think , gee today I am going to slam my car into the first Muslim I see .
Still curious as to how he was sure they were Muslim .
To all the prejudgers:
Tesla's Autopilot can be HACKED: Experts reveal how easy it is to sabotage the feature on a Model S
- Researchers used off-the-shelf materials to trick the autopilot sensors
- They said radar attacks have the potential to cause a high-speed collision
- Tesla has downplayed the results, saying they have 'not been able to reproduce any real-world cases that pose risk to Tesla drivers’
How to hack a car — a quick crash-course
How to hack a car — a quick crash-course
By Kenny Kuchera The goal of this article is to get you started hacking cars — fast, cheap, and easy. In order to do this, we’ll spoof the RPM gauge as an example. The following is by no means an exhaustive tutorial. It instead aims to provide just e...
WikiLeaks: CIA can hack cars to carry out undetectable assassinations
WikiLeaks: CIA can hack cars to carry out undetectable assassinations
In a series of released documents, WikiLeaks claims the Central Intelligence Agency has discussed hacking automobiles and using them for assassinations.
www.motor1.com
WIKILEAKS UNVEILS TREASURE TROVE OF CIA DOCUMENTS
Of note, the CIA has developed numerous 0-day exploits for iOS and Android devices. The ‘Weeping Angel’ exploit for Samsung smart TVs, “places the target TV in a ‘Fake-Off’ mode, so that the owner falsely believes the TV is off when it is on.” This Fake-Off mode enables a microphone in the TV, records communications in the room, and sends these recordings to a CIA server. Additionally, the CIA has also developed tools to take over vehicle control systems. The purpose of such tools is speculative but could be used to send a moving car off the road.
WikiLeaks Unveils Treasure Trove Of CIA Documents
The latest from WikiLeaks is the largest collection of documents ever released from the CIA. The release, called ‘Vault 7: CIA Hacking Tools Revealed’, is the CIA’s hacking arsena…
Yeah sure, ya gotta luv the whitehate autoguilt...
Just sayin....
The very fact that MF already has him executed ( based on his accuracy so far ) means it's very doubtful that the accused is actually guilty.
Last edited:
LILLEY: Calling out bigotry starts with denouncing Quebec's Bill 21
Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Publishing date:Jun 08, 2021 • 10 hours ago • 3 minute read • 41 Comments
Quebec Premier Francois Legault is seen during a news conference after a meeting with provincial premiers in Toronto, Dec. 2, 2019.
Quebec Premier Francois Legault is seen during a news conference after a meeting with provincial premiers in Toronto, Dec. 2, 2019. PHOTO BY CARLOS OSORIO /REUTERS / FILES
Article content
We can’t call out the kind of hatred that leads to a targeted terrorist attack like we allegedly saw in London this week if we aren’t willing to call out the things that help lead to such acts.
For federal leaders, that includes denouncing in no uncertain terms, Quebec’s Bill 21.
It may seem odd to say that we need to call out a law in Quebec for an alleged terrorist attack against a Muslim family in Ontario, but they are connected.
Bill 21 is the so-called secularism bill in Quebec. It says that people who wear religious symbols — be it a hijab, a yamulke or a turban — are banned from jobs in the public service.
It spells out rules for members of the public to receive services as well.
Bill 21 is a bigoted piece of legislation. It is the kind of legislation that should be denounced by all but hasn’t been because the law is highly popular in Quebec.
Yet, do we really want to have governments of any stripe deciding what we can wear — religiously or otherwise — in a free and democratic society? If the government can dictate what you can wear as a religious person, then they can dictate what you believe.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
Many people are upset at the idea of the government trying to mandate vaccines but if the government can mandate what you can and cannot wear, which religious symbols are acceptable and which are not, then of course they could mandate that you must take a vaccine or just about anything else.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly guarantees, “freedom of conscience and religion,” as well as “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression.” That would cover the wearing of religious garb or symbols.
It should cover a Christian who wants to wear a cross or crucifix as much as it covers a Muslim woman wearing a hijab.
We either have the freedom and we cherish it or we don’t.
Of course, Quebec regularly writes in the notwithstanding clause into their legislation, and they have in this case, as well. Bill 21 violates Quebec’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well, or would if they didn’t change it to say you have religious freedom except in certain circumstances.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
In his comments on the London attack on Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took time to call out those he felt were behind the ideas that lead to such attacks but did not name them. He did the same later that day during a news conference but there he was asked several times about Bill 21.
“Do you agree with what experts, advocates and activists in the community say, that Bill 21 fosters hatred and fosters discrimination?” Trudeau was asked.
“No,” was all Trudeau said.
Asked to expand, he spoke of the rights of provinces to put forward bills “that align with their priorities” and that people have the right to challenge such bills. Hardly, a denunciation of a clearly bigoted law.
At times, Trudeau has been critical of the bill but not critical enough.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
None of the federal leaders have been critical enough of this bill. They are too concerned about votes in Quebec which is why they are all willing to look the other way as Quebec brings in Bill 96 which tramples language rights.
Trudeau only deserves slightly harsher criticism because he is the prime minister but all the leaders deserve to be called out.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC
A man brings flowers and pays his respects at the scene where a man driving a pickup truck struck and killed four members of a Muslim family in London, Ont., June 7, 2021.
Trudeau calls London assault that killed four Muslim family members a 'terrorist attack'
Nafisa Azima holds her son, Seena Safdari, after placing flowers Monday night at the scene of a crash in northwest London that killed four members of a family 24 hours earlier. (Dale Carruthers, The London Free Press)
Victims' loved ones speak out as London vigil planned Tuesday night
Forensic officers take evidence photos at the scene of the multiple fatality on Hyde Park Road and South Carriage Road in London, Ont.
Four people were stuck by a car and died Sunday night.
Photograph taken on Monday June 7, 2021.
London police launch huge probe into crash that killed four pedestrians
We can’t say we need to stamp out bigotry in this country while the second-most populous province enables legislation that is the embodiment of the bigotry our leaders are denouncing.
Be it Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, racial hatred or any other form of bigotry, it needs to be called out, challenged and denounced. For federal leaders, that means challenging Bill 21.
torontosun.com
Author of the article:Brian Lilley
Publishing date:Jun 08, 2021 • 10 hours ago • 3 minute read • 41 Comments
Quebec Premier Francois Legault is seen during a news conference after a meeting with provincial premiers in Toronto, Dec. 2, 2019.
Quebec Premier Francois Legault is seen during a news conference after a meeting with provincial premiers in Toronto, Dec. 2, 2019. PHOTO BY CARLOS OSORIO /REUTERS / FILES
Article content
We can’t call out the kind of hatred that leads to a targeted terrorist attack like we allegedly saw in London this week if we aren’t willing to call out the things that help lead to such acts.
For federal leaders, that includes denouncing in no uncertain terms, Quebec’s Bill 21.
It may seem odd to say that we need to call out a law in Quebec for an alleged terrorist attack against a Muslim family in Ontario, but they are connected.
Bill 21 is the so-called secularism bill in Quebec. It says that people who wear religious symbols — be it a hijab, a yamulke or a turban — are banned from jobs in the public service.
It spells out rules for members of the public to receive services as well.
Bill 21 is a bigoted piece of legislation. It is the kind of legislation that should be denounced by all but hasn’t been because the law is highly popular in Quebec.
Yet, do we really want to have governments of any stripe deciding what we can wear — religiously or otherwise — in a free and democratic society? If the government can dictate what you can wear as a religious person, then they can dictate what you believe.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
Many people are upset at the idea of the government trying to mandate vaccines but if the government can mandate what you can and cannot wear, which religious symbols are acceptable and which are not, then of course they could mandate that you must take a vaccine or just about anything else.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly guarantees, “freedom of conscience and religion,” as well as “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression.” That would cover the wearing of religious garb or symbols.
It should cover a Christian who wants to wear a cross or crucifix as much as it covers a Muslim woman wearing a hijab.
We either have the freedom and we cherish it or we don’t.
Of course, Quebec regularly writes in the notwithstanding clause into their legislation, and they have in this case, as well. Bill 21 violates Quebec’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well, or would if they didn’t change it to say you have religious freedom except in certain circumstances.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
In his comments on the London attack on Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took time to call out those he felt were behind the ideas that lead to such attacks but did not name them. He did the same later that day during a news conference but there he was asked several times about Bill 21.
“Do you agree with what experts, advocates and activists in the community say, that Bill 21 fosters hatred and fosters discrimination?” Trudeau was asked.
“No,” was all Trudeau said.
Asked to expand, he spoke of the rights of provinces to put forward bills “that align with their priorities” and that people have the right to challenge such bills. Hardly, a denunciation of a clearly bigoted law.
At times, Trudeau has been critical of the bill but not critical enough.
Advertisement
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Article content
None of the federal leaders have been critical enough of this bill. They are too concerned about votes in Quebec which is why they are all willing to look the other way as Quebec brings in Bill 96 which tramples language rights.
Trudeau only deserves slightly harsher criticism because he is the prime minister but all the leaders deserve to be called out.
A man brings flowers and pays his respects at the scene where a man driving a pickup truck struck and killed four members of a Muslim family in London, Ont., June 7, 2021.
Trudeau calls London assault that killed four Muslim family members a 'terrorist attack'
Nafisa Azima holds her son, Seena Safdari, after placing flowers Monday night at the scene of a crash in northwest London that killed four members of a family 24 hours earlier. (Dale Carruthers, The London Free Press)
Victims' loved ones speak out as London vigil planned Tuesday night
Forensic officers take evidence photos at the scene of the multiple fatality on Hyde Park Road and South Carriage Road in London, Ont.
Four people were stuck by a car and died Sunday night.
Photograph taken on Monday June 7, 2021.
London police launch huge probe into crash that killed four pedestrians
We can’t say we need to stamp out bigotry in this country while the second-most populous province enables legislation that is the embodiment of the bigotry our leaders are denouncing.
Be it Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, racial hatred or any other form of bigotry, it needs to be called out, challenged and denounced. For federal leaders, that means challenging Bill 21.
LILLEY: Calling out bigotry starts with denouncing Quebec's Bill 21
It may seem odd to say that we need to call out a law in Quebec for an alleged terrorist attack against a Muslim family in Ontario.
Bill 21 is NOT a bigoted piece of legislation. There is nothing wrong with Bill 21, you might say it’s a dress code legislation.
The Muslims and others would all have fit if their children had no choice but to be taught by Catholic Nuns.
No religious garb in schools of impressionable children is the correct way to go.
All provinces should accept Bill 21.
The Muslims and others would all have fit if their children had no choice but to be taught by Catholic Nuns.
No religious garb in schools of impressionable children is the correct way to go.
All provinces should accept Bill 21.
