Official Records From International Red Cross Prove

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Are you really so narrow minded to miss the point that I was pointing directly at you when I mentioned Fanatics and extremists.......You're making exactly my point that you twist everything you read to suit your purpose.....It's useless to try and talk sense with someone who has a one track mind.
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
DaSleeper: "Are you really so narrow minded to miss the point that I was pointing directly at you when I mentioned Fanatics and extremists.......You're making exactly my point that you twist everything you read to suit your purpose.....It's useless to try and talk sense with someone who has a one track mind."

The sad part is that YOU cannot see that this applies to YOU, and the others who have spoken. Whereas you have only read what the "politically correct" factions have allowed you to read, I have done reading on BOTH sides of the issue, as any true thinker must. To be "one sided" is to be fanatical. I have read material on BOTH sides, and have stated that, in order to determine the TRUTH of the issue, we need objective EXPERTS -- i.e., PROFESSIONAL HISTORIANS -- to jump in and do their job: a job they WANT to do for us all!

Now what is wrong with that? Why is it wrong to state that professional historians should be allowed to investigate the facts, and present them to us? Any reasonable person, with an open mind, who is willing to admit of EITHER possibility -- which ***I*** AM! -- would want these historians to DO the job they so badly WANT to do! It is only the Jews who are stopping them. This makes me suspicious of the Jews. Anyone who tries to obfuscate one side of an issue is the suspicious party. I am for the TRUTH. I am not saying that ***I*** know as yet WHAT that truth is!!! I will separate this next part, because it is important:

I FULLY ADMIT THAT THE JEWS MAY BE TELLING THE TRUTH! I admit the POSSIBILITY that 6 Million Jews really MAY have died!!!

But "may have" does ***NOT*** mean "DID"! The only ones who can ascertain whether or not it actually happened are -- as I have been saying -- non-biased, professional, expert HISTORIANS! Let them do their job! What's wrong with that? Let them LOOK! Let them DISCOVER! And then, most importantly, let them TELL US!

"Narrow minded"? On the contrary: I am willing (and have done so above!) to admit that I may be wrong: are YOU? I am open-minded enough to allow the experts to do their research, and give us their conclusion: a conclusion that may very well prove me wrong! But science is not about being RIGHT: science is about LEARNING! Whenever we are proven wrong, it means we have learned something. I am willing to take the chance on being wrong, and learning something. Are you? Let the historians do their job, and we will ALL learn something. Prevent them from doing their job, and we all remain in the dark...
 

Featherchucker

New Member
Apr 9, 2007
4
0
1
The new facist leftist is always looking for ways to distort the historical truths to make themselves more acceptable to the general modern society. Deny everthing long enough and the event is swept away to the dustbins. They hope with time memories will weaken and they can slide(slime) back into the light as a respectable political force. Holocaust deniers or the modern day NATIONAL SOCIALISTS WORKERS types are either ignorant twisted twits whom are too lazy or calculating to verify what they read or repeat or actual scum whom believe their predecessors were righteous to kill all those innocents. Hang every Nazi scum you can find.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
Also, most of the people who died in the camps died as a result of diseases. Remember, that was back before vaccines!

Are you serious? They are just as responsible for those deaths as any they caused by the gas chambers and shootings. When you place people in horrible living conditions like that, of course there will be disease. Nice argument.:roll:
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
Maybe shorter sentences and smaller words would help.

Historians are not racists. (Some may be: but I mean as a whole. Historians are interested in history: period.)

Jews make a claim: 6 Million Jews died during WWII in Nazi Concentration Camps.

Holocaust Deniers claim that the Holocaust did not happen: that 6 Million Jews did NOT die.

Obviously, these two sides could argue back and forth for generations: and that is exactly what has happened.

The only referee that could potentially settle this issue, once and for all, so that the history books can carry the correct story, is a team of non-biased (this cuts out the racists, holocaust deniers, and "believers" who have already made up their minds, such as Jews) expert historians.

I am not a professional historian. Is anyone here a professional historian? I didn't think so.

Therefore, why don't we admitted amateurs allow the experts to do their job?

If our car was broken, we'd take it to a mechanic.

If the TV dies, we take it to a TV repair shop.

If the computer dies, we take it to BestBuy, or some other computer shop.

When we have a question about history, we ask...______________?

That's right: we ask a history professor...or two or three, since they have different views. That is why a non-biased TEAM of expert historians is required to answer this particular question.

A team of expert historians gathered at a professional conference in 2006. This was not a KKK meeting; it was not a Neo-Nzai meeting. It was a typical, "boring" meeting of dusty, musty historians. Most people would fall asleep at these annual events. But this past year, the conference caused a ruckus, because they dared to ask if they could investigate the WWII era to get to the bottom of this Holocaust question once and for all. They are, after all, emminently qualified. Why NOT let them?

It seemed a reasonable request...but one that has been denied. Why? Why not let those whose job it is to research such things do their job? That is not a racist question at all. For all we know, there were 10 Million Jews killed! Perhaps these historians would revise the number UPWARD? Isn't that possible? And if so, wouldn't the Jewish community like to KNOW that?

Since when did a quest for the truth become "racist"? What have we allowed the forces of "political correctness" to do to our society? I never thought I'd see the day when I would be called a "racist", because I am NOT! I never HAVE been! I am a scientist: period. I have always gone by the facts. Einstein has always been one of my personal heroes. Did you know he was Jewish? Dr. Wilhelm Reich (one of Sigmund Freud's best students) was also Jewish...and another one of my heroes. I have no problem with Jews at all. Or Buddhists. Or Hindus. Or any OTHER race or religion! But when the Jews try to obfuscate an historical question, any logical mind has to ask "Why?". I did not ask this because I am a racist: I really just wanted to know! Why were these historians being told that they could not investigate the years between 1939 and 1945? It just didn't seem right.

So I started reading as much as I could on the subject. The more I read, the more it seemed that the Jews were hiding something. I say this, not because I am a racist, or have anything at all against Jews: they could have been ANYBODY, and I would have had the same question in my mind: what are they trying to hide? Why forbid people to investigate their purported "Holocaust"? What did they have to fear from the truth?

It was not racism that moved me to start researching this topic: it was curiosity. What's wrong with curiosity?
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
shadowshiv: "Are you serious? They are just as responsible for those deaths as any they caused by the gas chambers and shootings. When you place people in horrible living conditions like that, of course there will be disease. Nice argument."

Nice try. <G> So I suppose the Federal goivernment fo the United States is at fault every time someone gets sick and dies in one of their prisons, or is stabbed to death in one? Some guy holds up a liquor store (i.e., commits a crime), so they send him to prison. What were they SUPPOSED to do with him? Let him roam free?

The Jews broke International Law by advocating a violent overthrow of the government. Go ahead and try that inthe United States: you'l go straight to prison...or to Git'mo these days! It is fine to hold PEACEFUL protests: but advocate a VIOLENT overthrow, and you're done: period. That's the law. Ask a lawyer if you doubt me. Seriously. Pick up a phone book, and call any of the hundreds that cite "free phone consultation": ask them the question. They'll back me up, 100% guaranteed.

So the government of Germany had every right to imprison Jews, who -- as a group -- had advocated a violent overthrow of the German government.

Now, as you stated, any time you put that mnay people together in a prison camp, disease will run rampant. That's unfortunate...and the situation is better today, due to more advanced medicine than in the '30s: but prison is not the best environment granted. But imprisoning them is a far cry from outright executing them, and that's where the question lies: WERE they, in fact, executed wholesale?

Only an expert team of historians can answer that. I am not an expert historian. You are not an expert historian. Let's allow the people whose job this is, to actually DO their job. They WANT to do their job...so why not LET them?
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
With regard to the reson for the Jews' incarceration:

"With the coming of the war the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September 5, 1939 Chaim Weizmann, the principal Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world's Jews, stating that "the Jews stand by Great Bitain and will fight on the side of the democracies... The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc..." (Javish Chronicle, September 8, 1939).
 

Outta here

Senate Member
Jul 8, 2005
6,778
158
63
Edmonton AB
....5,000...Hmmmm....a FAR cry from 6 Million, ay?

ok. Have it your way. We can shout at each other if it works better for you.

so YES Malklaka, 5,000 people. Not NUMBERS malklaka, PEOPLE... with children and mothers and friends and LIVES.... in ONE grave in ONE camp. ONE camp out of HOW MANY???]

This desire to uphold the truth is not borne of narrow mindedness imo, it rises from the fact that we have had to force ourselves to acknowledge the depths of depravity we are capable of sinking to... in order to ensure we never allow ourselves to even consider allowing or turning a blind eye to such a thing ever again. I don't think we're altogether successful either, as other incidents of genocide have and continue to occur. But minimizing the facts of the catastrophe can surely not be the way to the truth ?

Yanno, I might be more inclined to listen to you if you a) stopped YELLING your points at me, and b) dropped the blithe attitude about the loss of so many lives... whether it be 5,000 or 6 million.
 

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
shadowshiv: "Are you serious? They are just as responsible for those deaths as any they caused by the gas chambers and shootings. When you place people in horrible living conditions like that, of course there will be disease. Nice argument."

Nice try. <G> So I suppose the Federal goivernment fo the United States is at fault every time someone gets sick and dies in one of their prisons, or is stabbed to death in one? Some guy holds up a liquor store (i.e., commits a crime), so they send him to prison. What were they SUPPOSED to do with him? Let him roam free?

The prisons of today are a far cry better(and more sanitary) than anything those poor people had to endure. Prisoners get to watch television, work out, read books, eat THREE times a day. The prisoners in the concentration camps had NONE of those. I don't even know why I bother trying to convince you otherwise, as you will just twist what I say and try to make it come out all rosy.
 

triedit

inimitable
Historians are not the folks to go to for the facts. Historians report what has happened based on what everybody has said at the time and since.

If you're going to try to get an accurate body count, that's going to be very difficult. Many were incinerated. Many were in mass graves only now being found. It would take a huge amount of archaeoligsts and anthropologists and forensic scientists to underatake such a project. That takes money and governmental approval from all countries involved. Realistically, that's not going to happen.

Regardless of the numbers, the halocaust happened. People were killed because of thier religious beliefs (it was those beliefs that fueld the uprising against Germany). People were forced to leave thier homes and many were killed outright. On top of that, Hitler attempted to create a "pure" race so that this sort of thing could not ever happen again.

Unless you are a blue eyed blonde male who speaks pure german and no other language, you really don't have a clue what Hitler was trying to achieve at the cost of so many lives.

This thread is pointless.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
This numbers discourse is a callous light to examine the atrocities by, does it really matter how many died? Though I think it much worse to be so blatantly low-balling the numbers.

Also, the vaccination crap back there, Jenner used the first vaccine on his child in the late 1700's. As Shiv said cramped quarters and increased stress lead to disease. Not a real shocker. Not like the freak science project which meticulously documented and perfected mass murders...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Outta here

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
TreidIt: "Historians are not the folks to go to for the facts. Historians report what has happened based on what everybody has said at the time and since.

If you're going to try to get an accurate body count, that's going to be very difficult. Many were incinerated. Many were in mass graves only now being found. It would take a huge amount of archaeoligsts and anthropologists and forensic scientists to underatake such a project. That takes money and governmental approval from all countries involved. Realistically, that's not going to happen."

-----------

Actually, that is not true. While not a professional historian myself, I have read enough of their papers and books to ascertain a bit about their methods.

If the professional, expert historians were allowed to look into this issue, the first place they would start is with census data taken BEFORE Hitler came to power in 1933: determine how many Jews were in Europe PRIOR to the Holocaust.

Next, they would check exit VISAs ( to see how many left Europe), as well as entrance papers in the United States, Canada, Britain, France, etc., etc., to see how many ENTERED those countries from Europe. (These countries keep track of who is entering from where.)

Thus, if the historians were to find that there were (for ease of math, I'll use round numbers) 10 Million Jews in Europe before Hitler came to power. Then, from 1933 to 1945, a total of 4 Million Jews left Europe, and entered the U.S., Canada, Britain, France, etc. -- that would leave 6 Million Jews in Europe, potentially to be slaughtered at Nazi hands. Of course, there would be the survivors with numbers tatooed on their arms: we'd have to subtract those...but you get the idea.

This can all be done by historians: this is right up their alley: the kind of thing they do all the time; piece of cake. Once we see what they find, we'll know if the "6 Million Died" claim is even in the ballpark. If so, the historians steam forward to do what it is they do best: document historical fact to the best extent possible.

But first, we have to let them do the research, and report on it.

Several reports issed by those who took the risk, and lost thier tenured positions, indicated that there were only 2.8 Million Jews in Europe (or at least, in European countries over which Hitler eventually had influence!) before Hitler took office in 1933. SInce some obviously left -- the ones with the money -- this left the historians asking the obvious mathematical question: how do 6 Million die if there were only 2.8 Million to begin with? Obviously, with Hitler publicly spewing rhetoric against the Jews, no Jews would have MOVED TO Hitler-occupied areas during the years 1933-1945: so we can be QUITE sure that the 2.8 Million figure did not INCREASE! And the import data from the U.S., Canada, Britain, France, etc. would tell us exactly how many of the original 2.8 Million made it to safe shores.

But when any history professor -- tenrued or otherwise -- asks this simple mathematical question, they get fired, and branded as racists. Come on! This is a question anyone who can balance a CHECKBOOK would ask! We'd all love to have a bank account with 2.8 Million dollars, and somehow end-up with 6 Million dollars: but that just doesn't happen.

But granted that the 6 Million figure was inaccurate: then exactly how many of the original 2.8 Million died? Even half would be a tragedy: but the historians' job is not to lament, or judge, or worry about emotional impact, etc.: they are charged with one simple duty: document the facts. Pretty simple; failry boring, tedious work; they just want the facts.

Being a lifelong scientist, living and dying by mathematical equations, I for one would like to know the truth of the numbers. And for those who quote the numbers: my Grandmother brought me up to always be truthful; that has stuck with me my whole life. If I quote something as fact, I want to be sure it IS actually a fact. Shouldn't we give all Jews worldwide the benefit of the doubt, and assume they feel likewise: that when they state something is a fact, they want to be telling the truth? If they say 6 Million died (or 6,123,486: whatever the actual number happens to be!), don't you think they would want to rest assured knowing that they are being 100% truthful with the world public?

Since I am ***NOT*** a racist, I ***DO*** give them this benefit of the doubt, and assume that they would want to know that they are speaking the absolute truth when they tell us that 6 Million died. That is why it is upsetting when they seem to want to block any attempt to verify that number.

Now, in all fairness, we all know that governments sometimes do things that are NOT in agreement with the wishes of the people they govern. So perhaps it is only the leaders at the top that have engaged this policy of obfuscation: maybe they have the wrong people at the top. If you know any Jewish people (I don't, so I can't do this myself), ask them personally, one-on-one: if there was a way to verify the exact number of their people who died in WWII, wouldn't they want to know it, so that when they repeat the number, they know they are telling the truth?

My Grandmother also taught me that most people are basically honest at heart. From what I have seen in my life, I believe this. Yes, some cynics point to high crime rates, etc., and say that people are just all basically ortten. I do not believe that for one minute. Yes, SOME may be...and they usually end up in prison eventually. But the rest of us are honest, decent people at heart, who usually go out of our way to HELP other people! While I do not personally know any Jewish people, I have heard enough of them to believe that they are no different from us in this regard: that they are honest, decent people who would go out fo their way to help others, and believe in being 100% honest.

Perhaps if THEY spoke up, they could force their leaders to heed THEIR wishes, rather than steaming ahead with politial agendas that are not in accordance with the peoples' wishes?

Look at the U.S. at present: they are in a war in Iraq that 70% of the country's citizens believe they should NOT be in. Then why are they over there? Because of the politicians at the top who do as they please, regardless of the peoples' opinions. I believe that THIS is exactly what has happened to the Jewish people: they are all honest, hard-working, decent poeple; but their leaders have implemented a long-standing policy of impeding any inquiries into the Holocaust issue. Are they hiding things, even from their own people? Hmmm...would a government ever do that to its people? Gee...what do YOU think? How many bumper stickers have YOU seen that say "I love my country, but I fear my government!"? Why should we believe that the leaders of the Jewish people are any different? The Jewish people -- being basically honest, decent people like you or me -- probably repeat the "6 Million Died" figure because they truly, honestly BELIEVE it to be factual. After all, their leaders have TOLD them that it is true, right? Maybe if the Jewish people are different from us in any way, it is that they are simply more trusting of their leaders.

Let's help them all be honest and accurate: let the historians do their research, and we'll see what we see. The facts have never hurt anyone but the guilty...
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
Tonington: "This numbers discourse is a callous light to examine the atrocities by, does it really matter how many died?"

-----

If a man were on trial for mass murder (like Manson, let's say), wouldn't you want to know EXACTLY how many people he killed? I know the courts/police/judge/jury sure would! If he killed 12 rather than 10, that allows them to give him a longer/stricter sentence, to make sure he NEVER gets out on parole.

And then there are the families of the victims. Believe me, THEY want to know! A lifelong friend of mine is a police officer; he has investigated many murders while working with both the Chicago & L.A. police. For the families, not knowing is worse than knowing.

If someone's Grandmother or Grandfather went missing during WWII, they want to know what happened to them. Did they get displaced, and end-up living somewhere in Europe, while their children were separated, and ended-up in the U.S., Canada, etc.? Did they die in a mortar attack? Or were they a victim in a concentration camp? Maybe they were IN a concentration camp, but were freed in 1945, and are now living in the very next STATE under a slightly different spelling of their name, due to the way U.S. Immigration officials took great liberties with foreign names! (A lot of "bergs" became "burgs", "stein" became "stien", and vice versa, etc.)

Not knowing is always worse. So yes, it really matters how many died. And it matters HOW they died.

If someone you know died in a car accident, does it really matter if they were at fault, or the other driver? And if so, does it matter if the other driver was drunk, or just had a tire blowout? YES, it matters: when someone you love dies, you want to know everything possible about the circumstances of their death! It is your last real tie with them! Yes, you will love them forever, and honor/cherish their memory forever no matter HOW they died: but trust me, as one having been there, and known many others who have also: you want to know...

If your Jewish Grandmother died in a concentration camp in WWII, would you rather learn that she died in a gas chamber, or was tortured to death in some vile experiment...or that she simply contracted Cholera and died, as so many others did? I know, you'd rather she not have died at ALL! But since she DID die, wouldn't you want for her to have suffered as little as possible? Dying of Cholera is no picnic: but it's better than being slowly tortured to death, or the horror of choking to death on poison gas in a 'shower"! If it were MY grandmother, I'd want to know that she suffered as little as possible.

So if it were found that the "Holocaust" was a complete fabrication: i.e., that all deaths were as a result of illness/exhaustion/malnutrition: no, that is still not a pleasant way to go: but much better than the horrific alternative! If you had believed all these years that your poor grandmother had died at the hands of Nazi torturers; that her skin was made into lampshades, her fat into soap, etc., etc.: wouldn't you feel much better knowing that she had NOT been tortured that way, and that her body was NOT turned into various household items after her death, thereby demeaning her even after death? Of COURSE you would! So why not give this opportunity to all living family members who lost relatives in WWII concentration camps? Don't you think they deserve to know the truth?

And if the truth ends up being that it all happened exactly as the Jewish leaders have espoused all of these years: then at least the truth is finally known, and nobody can ever question it again. But if there is even the slightest chance that it did NOT happen in the horrific ways told all these years: don't you think the families of those people would want to know that? I know I would...
 

triedit

inimitable
See Mal this is where we have a problem. I am a professional researcher. I am well versed on immigration and genealogy. Thousands of people left without propper papers. Thousands have never been counted in a census. Even in Canada many go uncounted even to this day. The numbers would never match to any degree--illegal immigrants to Canada and the US alone would skew the numbers, let alone those who went to other European countries.

Again, it simply cannot be quantifiably established exactly how many were killed/died. It isnt realistic.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
If a man were on trial for mass murder (like Manson, let's say), wouldn't you want to know EXACTLY how many people he killed? I know the courts/police/judge/jury sure would! If he killed 12 rather than 10, that allows them to give him a longer/stricter sentence, to make sure he NEVER gets out on parole.

... ... ....

And if the truth ends up being that it all happened exactly as the Jewish leaders have espoused all of these years: then at least the truth is finally known, and nobody can ever question it again. But if there is even the slightest chance that it did NOT happen in the horrific ways told all these years: don't you think the families of those people would want to know that? I know I would...

What I'm saying Malk is that on the scale here, it matters little. The Germans tried to exterminate Jews, homosexuals, atheists, mentally and physically handicapped, basically any trait deemed unworthy. The numbers cited in the original post seem to me inflammatory for the simple reason that they trivialize the actions taken. Once you've crossed that line to an extermination program do you really think that numbers matter, to the guilty mind, or the survivors and their families? Would you care to know if a loved one was first or 234, 569th to be killed in a gas chamber? That is a trivial detail to me.

I would like to know how many people a mass murderer has killed for justice to be served to those who lost somebody. However, as I said that is orders of magnitude more possible to precisely numerate than say the genocides committed in Europe by the Germans.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
-----------

Actually, that is not true. While not a professional historian myself, I have read enough of their papers and books to ascertain a bit about their methods.

If the professional, expert historians were allowed to look into this issue, the first place they would start is with census data taken BEFORE Hitler came to power in 1933: determine how many Jews were in Europe PRIOR to the Holocaust.

Next, they would check exit VISAs ( to see how many left Europe), as well as entrance papers in the United States, Canada, Britain, France, etc., etc., to see how many ENTERED those countries from Europe. (These countries keep track of who is entering from where.)

Thus, if the historians were to find that there were (for ease of math, I'll use round numbers) 10 Million Jews in Europe before Hitler came to power. Then, from 1933 to 1945, a total of 4 Million Jews left Europe, and entered the U.S., Canada, Britain, France, etc. -- that would leave 6 Million Jews in Europe, potentially to be slaughtered at Nazi hands. Of course, there would be the survivors with numbers tatooed on their arms: we'd have to subtract those...but you get the idea.

This can all be done by historians: this is right up their alley: the kind of thing they do all the time; piece of cake. Once we see what they find, we'll know if the "6 Million Died" claim is even in the ballpark. If so, the historians steam forward to do what it is they do best: document historical fact to the best extent possible.

But first, we have to let them do the research, and report on it.

Several reports issed by those who took the risk, and lost thier tenured positions, indicated that there were only 2.8 Million Jews in Europe (or at least, in European countries over which Hitler eventually had influence!) before Hitler took office in 1933. SInce some obviously left -- the ones with the money -- this left the historians asking the obvious mathematical question: how do 6 Million die if there were only 2.8 Million to begin with? Obviously, with Hitler publicly spewing rhetoric against the Jews, no Jews would have MOVED TO Hitler-occupied areas during the years 1933-1945: so we can be QUITE sure that the 2.8 Million figure did not INCREASE! And the import data from the U.S., Canada, Britain, France, etc. would tell us exactly how many of the original 2.8 Million made it to safe shores.

..

This is baloney. Hate to hoist you on your own petard,so to speak, but..........

Pre-war European population of Jews:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/jewpop.html

About 9.5 million...........

And in 1945?

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005687

About 3.5 million.

Case closed.
 

malklaka

New Member
Jun 8, 2007
28
0
1
colpy: "This is baloney. Hate to hoist you on your own petard,so to speak, but..........

Pre-war European population of Jews:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...st/jewpop.html

About 9.5 million...........

And in 1945?

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php...uleId=10005687

About 3.5 million.

Case closed."

------

<G> "Hoist by ones own petard". I love it: I thought I was the only one left using that one. ; ->

My only problem here is hte source: "jewishvirtuallibrary.com". As i stated previously, if we are to arrive at objectively true facts in this case (remember the original post -- not mine, by the way! -- was about the recent Red Cross revelation), we can not take at face value any statistics given by racist sites, neo-Nazi sites, nor Jewish sites. The data must come from non-baised sources, whether said sources are perceived as "good" or "bad".

Also, as I mentioned previously, you cannot take the entire jewish population of Europe: only those portions that came under Hitler's control. He may have TRIED to take all of ERurope, but he did not succeed. He did not managed to even get all of France: just portions thereof. And naturally, after Hitler commenced anti-Jewish propaganda and new laws, no Jewish person in their right mind would have moved TO a Hitler-controlled area.

What we need are "direct from the horse's mouth" statistics fromt he countries themselves. This is where the professional historians come in. The are trained for this; they are very GOOD at this; they WANT to do this: are chomping at the bit, in fact! I say, let's let them do their jobs: then nobody can argue with the results.
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
How can you say no one can argue with the results. Hell 6 million Jews get slaughtered by the Nazis, everyone and his dog knows it, yet here you are argueing that it never happened.



colpy: "This is baloney. Hate to hoist you on your own petard,so to speak, but..........

Pre-war European population of Jews:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...st/jewpop.html

About 9.5 million...........

And in 1945?

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php...uleId=10005687

About 3.5 million.

Case closed."

------

<G> "Hoist by ones own petard". I love it: I thought I was the only one left using that one. ; ->

My only problem here is hte source: "jewishvirtuallibrary.com". As i stated previously, if we are to arrive at objectively true facts in this case (remember the original post -- not mine, by the way! -- was about the recent Red Cross revelation), we can not take at face value any statistics given by racist sites, neo-Nazi sites, nor Jewish sites. The data must come from non-baised sources, whether said sources are perceived as "good" or "bad".

Also, as I mentioned previously, you cannot take the entire jewish population of Europe: only those portions that came under Hitler's control. He may have TRIED to take all of ERurope, but he did not succeed. He did not managed to even get all of France: just portions thereof. And naturally, after Hitler commenced anti-Jewish propaganda and new laws, no Jewish person in their right mind would have moved TO a Hitler-controlled area.

What we need are "direct from the horse's mouth" statistics fromt he countries themselves. This is where the professional historians come in. The are trained for this; they are very GOOD at this; they WANT to do this: are chomping at the bit, in fact! I say, let's let them do their jobs: then nobody can argue with the results.