Muslim Brotherly Love via Torch light
- Thread starter Torch light
- Start date
Seized land outside the UN recognized boundaries.
Negotiated in bad faith and violated negotiated agreements.
Discriminated against Palestinians inside Israel, including committing war crimes against them.
By the way, I agree with you and gerryh (except for the lame-ass whataboutery). I just don't pretend Israel is pure as the driven snow.
Careful; saying Israel isn't pure about itself will make Girth claim you're not for the Jews at all and hint you're antisemetic and far left leaning...
You are far-left leaning. All it takes, is to look at your posting history. This is a flag you may want to consider for your avatar.
Really?
Methinks you've not been paying attention to my posting then. Lots of times people have said "Leftards" say and do things that I don't agree with.
So... what then?
Just because I think Israel is just as bad as Palestine, I'm far left? LOL... you're funny.
Dependant on BiBi NOT expanding into the West Bank.
Which he said isn't negotiable.
So we'll see.
Only in your head. Stating that they seized land says nothing about provocation, except to somebody desperate to justify Israel's actions.
Settlement policy in the West Bank. Criticized even by pro-Israel U.S. administrations.
OK, so if somebody murders (legal term meaning "deliberately kills without justification" one of "yours"), it's OK to murder some of theirs? Good to know. Gives me an insight into your level of knowledge and thinking.
Well, you can, and have demonstrated that you will, whilst at the same time declaring that countries you like that have committed war crimes are pure as the driven snow. I use the terms as presented in international law, particularly but not limited to the Hague and Geneva Conventions.
Whataboutery. How original.
That is a lie. You do not consider Palestine "as bad as" Israel. That is very obvious in your one sided condemnation.
Sorry, you can't justify the '48 and the '67 attack on Israel on their policy in the west bank. Do try again.
That's nice, what you quoted has nothing to do with that, stupid.
Btw, the statement itself is incorrect.
Are you saying I don't know my own mind?
One sided condemnation?
I think you need to read what I've written about the subject. BOTH sides are as bad as the other. Have been for a while. I honestly think the last time Israel had a chance for Peace, they assassinated the man behind that chance and there's been no one since Rabin who actually does want peace.
Instead it's been warmongers, expansionists and terrorists.
Irony is, Palestine hasn't changed from being a terrorist backed state; rather Israel has lowered itself to becoming like Palestine.
That basically confirms what I said. Your condemnation is one sided, your support is overwhelming in favourite of Palestine and the Arab countries.
No, thanks. I don't know what you're babbling about.
If you feel like saying something coherent and on point, I'll be happy to discuss it with you.
Ah, now that I've looked back over it, I see where you went wrong. Protip: read the posts quoted. You'll understand the answers better.
Nope, won land through spoils of war, after being attacked. IMO, Israel should never have returned the land they annexed.
Link.
Again, link.
Sorry, I don't see it.