Lol Why all the badie? =)
It works for the American republicans lol
They don't appreciate your sense of humor;-)
I knew that, so I played with it.If a being changes from being a lizard to a human, regardless of what's on their mind, they are still human.
It was a joke anyway. Not meant to be over-thought and analyzed.
It has been said that republicans don't have a sense of humour but just look at the bunch of clowns they have in the presidential race.bunch of party poopers:smile:
And the occupy movement is simple grassroots,and in touch with reality.Someone said the Republicans are conservatives, well normally that would be true
however the current group is not made up of conservatives, they are merely a
collection of people are not all there. The Tea Party are out of touch with reality let
alone the people.
Actually many are of wealth and privilege, with a credited education credentials and
a low IQ.
It should also be noted I am not a conservative but a fiscal conservative and a social
conservative are two different things.
Ouch...that's gonna cause a stir :lol:
There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.
Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice | Racism, Bias & Politics | Right-Wing and Left-Wing Ideology | LiveScience
Why are people resistant to change? In many cases those who want to change things
state they want to change things. The often say what they want to change but not why.
If changes are not explained people will not embrace the change. Its all about buying
a pig in a poke as it were.
Icke's Lizard people are shape shifting humanoids, not human. I look at it as a metaphor for the reptilian mind set of those who want to rule the world and subjugate humanity. The base of our brain is reptilian and rules our instinctual behaviour. Domination seems to be an instinctual behaviour for psychopaths.
I can relate to that but some people need to be eased into that understanding. Pop their bubble all at once and you end up with a bunch of neurotics.It is not very hard to imagine the masters of this world as inhuman, actually they are definitely alien to the average humans thinking.
Icke is shady in my estimation. Alien domination of this planet has long been reality, in reality.
Aliens grow here too under careful cultivation for aeons..
I can relate to that but some people need to be eased into that understanding. Pop their bubble all at once and you end up with a bunch of neurotics.
Why are people resistant to change? In many cases those who want to change things
state they want to change things. The often say what they want to change but not why.
If changes are not explained people will not embrace the change. Its all about buying
a pig in a poke as it were.
Actually on whole the least change possible is best. Some people have a mania for changing things, mainly just to add their "flavor" to it and in doing so generally just f**k things right up. Some of the things they want to change took many years by many people to put in place and then one "Johnny come lately" out of the blue thinks he's got a better idea. Like this guy on the forum who thinks he's going to be the next Liberal Prime Minister. I don't think there's anything that should change by more than one or two percent at a time, and if possible it should be given a trial run in places like the remotest part of Greenland or Antarctica to make sure it works. :smile:
Perhaps prejudice is tied more closely to past experience than low intellect. :smile:
A taught behaviour...
So, things like civil rights for instance, that should have been given out no more than one or two per cent at a time? Maybe allow 2% of homosexuals to marry, and 2% to join the Military? Sometimes there are great changes in society, and they aren't always bad. Though the ones who lose power tend to view it as bad. We can pity and ridicule those who fought against ending slavery now....
All of them, except for the ones who don't.What percentage of homosexuals "normally" marry in a year?