[FONT="]So, Iggy by far is not the cause of the $50.2 Billion Glue or red ink, my forum friend you are reading this one poorly, stating that the people will blame Iggy for such drastic change of economic agenda from no deficit to $50.2 Billion, just in 8 months.[/FONT]
Of course Iggy had nothing to do with the astronomical deficit, Socrates. The love affair of conservatives with huge deficits is well known. Let me list the proponents of the Conservative ‘borrow and spend’ philosophy, who borrowed hugely, gave tax cuts to the rich, and ran up astronomical deficits.
Reagan
1st Bush
2nd Bush
Mulroney
Mike Harris
Harper.
In addition, some of them (Reagan, Mike Harris) made deep cuts to the services for the poor. The whole philosophy (borrow and spend, cut taxes for the rich and services for the poor) is a very nasty philosophy.
That is why I want no part of it. I can possibly see myself voting for a red Tory. But a blue Tory, a right winger like Harper (who is governing from centre right only because he has a minority)? No way.
Harper comes from a long line of deficit spenders, why should he not stay true to the conservative philosophy of ‘borrow and spend’?