Sadly all true.
PS, "Church/synagogue/mosque anyone?" I find such places stuffy, would prefer the open air to commune with the "Whatever it is".
PSS, Walter was busy I see.
Isreal fights back
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
Sadly all true.
PS, "Church/synagogue/mosque anyone?" I find such places stuffy, would prefer the open air to commune with the "Whatever it is".
PSS, Walter was busy I see.
Palestinians are the most westernized of the Muzzie/Greek Christians. The squabbles have nothing to do with Religions. It's all about the occupation and butchering by the Zionist pigs. Give you head a f-cking shiek already.
So the supposed limitations apply to Palestine only and leaves Israel to act through a 18oo year old claim of genetic occupation with out a single piece of evidence excepting their word and honor while the Palestinian desendents of those same alleged original Israelis can bring no case and can mount no rightful entitlment. This is the apex of hypocrisy. A gold star for crap to you sir.
There is a case for that Blackleaf same as there is for the return of England to the Celts and the Picts and the monkies who bore them.
Probably more of a brother-in-arms (without the arms). Both anti-Muslim bigots and both had more important priorities than serving, right, Jody?
That's okay, pony boy, you just keep leaning over for whomever wishes to use you........
Western civilization has been at war with Islam for almost 1300 years.
Ever hear of Charles Martel??
Well, things haven't gotten any friendlier.
An opinion I value more highly.
"Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding."
- Albert Einstein
You, Colpy, need an understanding injection.
The family feud has been going on for over three thousand years and it will not end
Yes they should just fight it out and get it over with. Tod adopt that policy would of
course mean there would be no stable force in the region for the next few hundred
years
This is not a civil war its crossing international boundaries with serious consequences
should such a battle take place
Yes they should just fight it out and get it over with. Tod adopt that policy would of
course mean there would be no stable force in the region for the next few hundred
years
This is not a civil war its crossing international boundaries with serious consequences
should such a battle take place
So Obama - the worst US President since Carter - wants Israel to go back to pre-1967 borders but you don't want America to go back to pre-1776 borders?
Therein lie the double-standards and hypocrisy of the historically ignorant Israel-haters.
The Israelis should make an ultimatum to the Obama regime - "That'll we'll go back to pre-1967 borders only if the Americans follow suit and go back to pre-1776 borders."
Fair's fair, after all.
Obama can't talk about anyone "occupying" others' land (people like him really need to take a good look at the political history of that land) when America occupies land which, not long ago, belonged to the Native Indians, British, French, Spanish, Mexicans and Russians.
I've heard of Charles Martel. He was the grandfather of Charlemagne, and he was a hero who halted the Islamic Conquest of Western Europe.
In 711 the Muslims conquered Hispania (modern Spain and Portugal), turning it into the Islamic Caliphate of Umayyad. The region of Andalusia gets its named from the Arabic al-Andalus, which is what the Muslims called the Iberian peninsula.
After conquering Hispania the Muslims then turned their attentions to Septimania (modern South of France), the last remnant of the Visigothic Kingdom.
The Umayyad conquest was stopped at the Battle of Toulouse in 721, but they sporadically raided Southern Gaul as far as Avignon, Lyon, and Autun.
In 732 the Battle of Tours-Poitiers pitted Frankish and Burgundian forces under Austrasian Mayor of the Palace, Charles Martel, against an army of the Umayyad Caliphate led by 'Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi, Governor-General of al-Andalus.
The Franks were victorious. 'Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi was killed, and Charles subsequently extended his authority in the south. Ninth-century chroniclers, who interpreted the outcome of the battle as divine judgment in his favour, gave Charles the nickname Martellus ("The Hammer"), possibly recalling Judas Maccabeus ("The Hammerer") of the Maccabean revolt.
So to maybe imply that Charles Martel was some sort of aggressor against the Muslims, when, in fact, he was defending his lands against Islamic imperialist aggression, is absurd.
Charles Martel is viewed today as a hero. Not only is he seen today as having laid the groundwork of the Carolingian Kingdom - which his grandson Charlemagne would end up ruling - but 18th century English historian and MP Edward Gibbon wrote that Martel was "the hero of the age," whereas the American critic, novelist, and professor Albert J. Guerard described him as being the "champion of the Cross against the Crescent."
Every native European today - including me - is descended from Charles Martel. He's my great-great-great-great-however-many-other-greats-grandfather.
Last edited: