No it isn't, not with 600,000 already living on 'occupied land'.- this public announcement is theater-
'Palestine can now sue Israel for illegal occupation' - YouTube
No it isn't, not with 600,000 already living on 'occupied land'.- this public announcement is theater-
Asses kicked by Muzzies but in the end, it did bring alGebra and alChemy to Europe ending the Dark Ages.Petros you forgot the Christians took the Holy Land once before and their battle cry was
Kill the all Let God decide. We all know how peaceful that turned out don't we.
As MHz mentioned 600,000 Israelis already live illegally on Palestinian land. So the project is well under way. As referenced in the OP, this latest colony for Israeli Jews on Palestinian land separates Jerusalem from the West Bank. Now that's been done, its only a matter of time until all remaining neighborhoods in and around Jerusalem are zoned for Jews only. Its only a matter of time until out every remaining dirty Arab has been evicted from Jerusalem and the surrounded suburbs.You make a lot of speculations- a ton of misinformation- this project is years away - and in my opinion will not be implemented.
And a poor excuse for a thread.
Canada's allies have called in the Israeli ambassadors to protest the proposed saettlements. Why hasn't Canada?
This forum is inclusive to everyone who can follow forum rules.Please, find a thread or forum on topic/s you are capable of understanding.
Look at it this way, the poster says he is Native so he was at one time a member on a Rez at the time Indian (only) schools were being used to brainwash the kids into buying the British version of the world, it worked and he left his real culture behind and adopted the 'new' truth only to find out later it was all bull**** but if he admitted it in public his new found home would reject him and he can't go back to his original people because they would view him as a traitor. He has also said he has Jewish friends in Montreal so if he spoke out agains Israeli policy they would also ditch him. You should actually pity him.Regarding this repugnant post:
This forum is inclusive to everyone who can follow forum rules.
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
.
Not so funny how you moved the Jews to the first in the list in all your posts about that era.
I'm glad you raised that issue Colpy
According to the Martin-Niemöller-Foundation the text is as follows[2]:
„Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,
habe ich geschwiegen,
ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie mich holten,
gab es keinen mehr,
der protestieren konnte.“
Which translates to:
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
In the United States, the quotation is more commonly known as:
First they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
Yet another version is
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
First they came... - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...
So I agree the poem has been twisted. Who added the lines about Jews?
That said, I would speak up for anyone facing oppression and injustice, including Jews. Many of my critics are more selective. Apparently Palestinians don't make your list.
Great armchair analysis from Doctor Doless:roll:Look at it this way, the poster says he is Native so he was at one time a member on a Rez at the time Indian (only) schools were being used to brainwash the kids into buying the British version of the world, it worked and he left his real culture behind and adopted the 'new' truth only to find out later it was all bull**** but if he admitted it in public his new found home would reject him and he can't go back to his original people because they would view him as a traitor. He has also said he has Jewish friends in Montreal so if he spoke out agains Israeli policy they would also ditch him. You should actually pity him.
Pity is still pity. lol Ever follow his actual post, one word over and over and over, that is the whole of his ability when confronted with any post with some facts.Great armchair analysis from Doctor Doless:roll:
Nooooo. Any open support would instanly justify Keebeck seperatists and 100% autonomous First Nation States in Canada. We can offer up support in different ways.Palestinians are getting screwed over by the Israelis and our government isn't speaking out.
Silence = tacit approval.
You should really do a little research before you quote.
The actual quote is from Pastor Martin Niemoller:
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."
Niemoller, despite being a decorated U-Boat captain in WWI, spent 8 years in concentration camps as a prisoner of Adolph Hitler because he resisted the Aryan Clause Hitler tried to force on Christian churches in Germany....which prevented Jews from becoming clegy.
Niemoller was speaking for the Jews, against the Jew murderers.
Funny how you left the Jews out.
To twist Niemoller's words against the Jewish state, to use them in defense of the followers of Hamas, an organization that considers ALL Jew-murder as "Praise to Allah".........
Well, it just ain't right.
And the Jews will never again appease Jew-haters.
"There were no minutes.....
QUOTE]
Why do you present fiction in the OP title - facts would be nice - All the OP does is present a title much akin to that reputable National Enquirer. You want reasonable discussion and debate but the OP title again shows bias.
Ever heard of proposed, approved, not constructed yet-
Why do you present fiction in the OP title - facts would be nice - All the OP does is present a title much akin to that reputable National Enquirer. You want reasonable discussion and debate but the OP title again shows bias.
Ever heard of proposed, approved, not constructed yet-
Recently I watched "Fiddler on the Roof". Its a powerful story with a powerful message about antisemitism under Czarist Russia. Fundamentally its about religious based oppression and injustice. I thought how much has changed. The oppressed are now the oppressors. A modern version of this play could easily be told substituting Czarist Russia for Zionist Israel, a traditional Jewish family for a traditional Palestinian one and a few Hebrew words for Arabic ones.
Never Again! is a joke. Of course its happening again.
The fact is, as of last week, the entire city of Jerusalem is now surrounded by an unbroken string of Jewish only colonies. Building the homes is a final formality. I noticed your biggest problem with that information is semantics.
So what did you learn from Niemoller's words?